大学生网络学术求助模式的识别及其在网络自我效能感中的作用

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100893
Yang-Hsin Fan , Tzung-Jin Lin
{"title":"大学生网络学术求助模式的识别及其在网络自我效能感中的作用","authors":"Yang-Hsin Fan ,&nbsp;Tzung-Jin Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main purposes of this study were, first, to identify Taiwanese university students’ online academic help-seeking (OAHS) patterns and further to compare their Internet self-efficacy (ISE) among the identified patterns. A total of 366 Taiwanese university students were invited to fill out two questionnaires to understand their OAHS and ISE, respectively. The results revealed that three OAHS patterns, <em>adaptive</em>, <em>self-reliant</em>, and <em>socially-affiliated</em>, were characterized based on the cluster analysis. The differences in the students’ various ISE dimensions among the three patterns were then compared. The <em>adaptive</em> students, who commonly adopted all types of OAHS behaviors, tended to be the most efficacious in the seven measured ISE dimensions. The <em>self-reliant</em> students, highlighting that they mainly sought help by searching for relevant information online, showed higher confidence in the ISE dimensions of “Usage,” “Application,” and “Learning” than did the <em>socially-affiliated</em> students (i.e., those who tended to use formal and informal queries to seek academic help online). The <em>socially-affiliated</em> students only showed higher confidence in sharing online information than the <em>self-reliant</em> students. However, in the “Communication,” “Verifying,” and “Metacognition” ISE dimensions, there were no significant differences between the <em>socially-affiliated</em> and <em>self-reliant</em> students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100893"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying university students’ online academic help-seeking patterns and their role in Internet self-efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Hsin Fan ,&nbsp;Tzung-Jin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main purposes of this study were, first, to identify Taiwanese university students’ online academic help-seeking (OAHS) patterns and further to compare their Internet self-efficacy (ISE) among the identified patterns. A total of 366 Taiwanese university students were invited to fill out two questionnaires to understand their OAHS and ISE, respectively. The results revealed that three OAHS patterns, <em>adaptive</em>, <em>self-reliant</em>, and <em>socially-affiliated</em>, were characterized based on the cluster analysis. The differences in the students’ various ISE dimensions among the three patterns were then compared. The <em>adaptive</em> students, who commonly adopted all types of OAHS behaviors, tended to be the most efficacious in the seven measured ISE dimensions. The <em>self-reliant</em> students, highlighting that they mainly sought help by searching for relevant information online, showed higher confidence in the ISE dimensions of “Usage,” “Application,” and “Learning” than did the <em>socially-affiliated</em> students (i.e., those who tended to use formal and informal queries to seek academic help online). The <em>socially-affiliated</em> students only showed higher confidence in sharing online information than the <em>self-reliant</em> students. However, in the “Communication,” “Verifying,” and “Metacognition” ISE dimensions, there were no significant differences between the <em>socially-affiliated</em> and <em>self-reliant</em> students.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751622000495\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751622000495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的主要目的是,首先,识别台湾大学生的在线学术求助(OAHS)模式,并进一步比较他们在所识别的模式中的网络自我效能感(ISE)。共有366名台湾大学生被邀请填写两份问卷,分别了解他们的OAHS和ISE。结果表明,基于聚类分析,OAHS有三种模式,即适应性、自力更生和社会附属。然后比较了三种模式下学生不同ISE维度的差异。适应性学生通常采用所有类型的OAHS行为,在七个测量的ISE维度中往往是最有效的。自力更生的学生强调,他们主要通过在线搜索相关信息来寻求帮助,他们对“使用”、“应用”和“学习”的ISE维度表现出比社会关系学生(即那些倾向于使用正式和非正式查询来在线寻求学术帮助的学生)更高的信心。与自力更生的学生相比,有社会关系的学生在分享在线信息方面只表现出更高的信心。然而,在“沟通”、“验证”和“元认知”ISE维度上,社会附属和自力更生的学生之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying university students’ online academic help-seeking patterns and their role in Internet self-efficacy

The main purposes of this study were, first, to identify Taiwanese university students’ online academic help-seeking (OAHS) patterns and further to compare their Internet self-efficacy (ISE) among the identified patterns. A total of 366 Taiwanese university students were invited to fill out two questionnaires to understand their OAHS and ISE, respectively. The results revealed that three OAHS patterns, adaptive, self-reliant, and socially-affiliated, were characterized based on the cluster analysis. The differences in the students’ various ISE dimensions among the three patterns were then compared. The adaptive students, who commonly adopted all types of OAHS behaviors, tended to be the most efficacious in the seven measured ISE dimensions. The self-reliant students, highlighting that they mainly sought help by searching for relevant information online, showed higher confidence in the ISE dimensions of “Usage,” “Application,” and “Learning” than did the socially-affiliated students (i.e., those who tended to use formal and informal queries to seek academic help online). The socially-affiliated students only showed higher confidence in sharing online information than the self-reliant students. However, in the “Communication,” “Verifying,” and “Metacognition” ISE dimensions, there were no significant differences between the socially-affiliated and self-reliant students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion Prior online learning experiences as incidental professional development: A cross-sectional survey of online instructor beliefs and strategies Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1