2000-2009年七种写作研究期刊的分析,第二部分:数据驱动的关键词识别

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102756
John R. Gallagher , Hsiang Wang , Matthew Modaff , Junjing Liu , Yi Xu
{"title":"2000-2009年七种写作研究期刊的分析,第二部分:数据驱动的关键词识别","authors":"John R. Gallagher ,&nbsp;Hsiang Wang ,&nbsp;Matthew Modaff ,&nbsp;Junjing Liu ,&nbsp;Yi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Keywords are often used to shed light on shared words and their meanings, including their contestation. Often these keywords are determined using small samples or author inferences. However, identification of large sample, data-driven keywords is important for writing studies to avoid a range of biases including socioeconomic, confirmation, and sampling. We use the methodologies of “term frequency-inverse document frequency” (TF-IDF) and collocation on a corpus of journal articles from seven major writing studies journals: <em>College Composition and Communication, College English, Computers and Composition, Research in the Teaching of English, Rhetoric Review, Rhetoric Society Quarterly</em>, and <em>Written Communication</em>. By examining approximately 99% of the research articles published in these journals between 2000 and 2019 (N = 2738), we determine the evolution of keywords over time. Changes in keywords suggest attention to the impact of technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses of seven writing studies journals, 2000–2019, Part II: Data-driven identification of keywords\",\"authors\":\"John R. Gallagher ,&nbsp;Hsiang Wang ,&nbsp;Matthew Modaff ,&nbsp;Junjing Liu ,&nbsp;Yi Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Keywords are often used to shed light on shared words and their meanings, including their contestation. Often these keywords are determined using small samples or author inferences. However, identification of large sample, data-driven keywords is important for writing studies to avoid a range of biases including socioeconomic, confirmation, and sampling. We use the methodologies of “term frequency-inverse document frequency” (TF-IDF) and collocation on a corpus of journal articles from seven major writing studies journals: <em>College Composition and Communication, College English, Computers and Composition, Research in the Teaching of English, Rhetoric Review, Rhetoric Society Quarterly</em>, and <em>Written Communication</em>. By examining approximately 99% of the research articles published in these journals between 2000 and 2019 (N = 2738), we determine the evolution of keywords over time. Changes in keywords suggest attention to the impact of technology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关键词经常被用来阐明共同的单词及其含义,包括它们的争论。这些关键词通常是使用小样本或作者推断来确定的。然而,识别大样本、数据驱动的关键词对于写作研究很重要,以避免一系列偏见,包括社会经济、确认和抽样。我们采用“术语-频率-逆文档-频率”(TF-IDF)和搭配的方法,对来自七个主要写作研究期刊的期刊文章进行了语料库研究:《大学作文与传播》、《大学英语》、《计算机与作文》、《英语教学研究》、《修辞学评论》、《修辞学会季刊》和《书面交流》。通过检查2000年至2019年间发表在这些期刊上的约99%的研究文章(N=2738),我们确定了关键词随时间的演变。关键词的变化表明人们关注技术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyses of seven writing studies journals, 2000–2019, Part II: Data-driven identification of keywords

Keywords are often used to shed light on shared words and their meanings, including their contestation. Often these keywords are determined using small samples or author inferences. However, identification of large sample, data-driven keywords is important for writing studies to avoid a range of biases including socioeconomic, confirmation, and sampling. We use the methodologies of “term frequency-inverse document frequency” (TF-IDF) and collocation on a corpus of journal articles from seven major writing studies journals: College Composition and Communication, College English, Computers and Composition, Research in the Teaching of English, Rhetoric Review, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, and Written Communication. By examining approximately 99% of the research articles published in these journals between 2000 and 2019 (N = 2738), we determine the evolution of keywords over time. Changes in keywords suggest attention to the impact of technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Transformative transmediation: Eliciting student self-evaluation of academic writing through the video essay assignment A rhetorical consideration of the {XE “embedded”} index Letter from the Editor Generosity in computers and writing: Doing what Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill Taught Us
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1