促进学生话语:在线和混合写作学生对教学存在的感知

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102761
Natalie Stillman-Webb , Lyra Hilliard , Mary K. Stewart , Jennifer M. Cunningham
{"title":"促进学生话语:在线和混合写作学生对教学存在的感知","authors":"Natalie Stillman-Webb ,&nbsp;Lyra Hilliard ,&nbsp;Mary K. Stewart ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Cunningham","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines whether delivery format affects the degree to which students perceive teaching presence in their online and hybrid first-year writing (FYW) courses. In the Community of Inquiry (CoI) theoretical framework, teaching presence plays a role in creating a learning community through instructional design, discourse facilitation, and direct instruction. To measure the extent to which students perceived these elements of teaching presence, the Community of Inquiry in Writing Studies survey was administered to 669 students in online and hybrid sections of FYW at four universities.</p><p>Online and hybrid students demonstrated similar perceptions of teaching presence through individualized feedback and the instructor-student relationship, but they differed in their perceptions of group activities and the instructor-student-student relationship. Of the three categories of teaching presence, discourse facilitation was the one about which online and hybrid student perspectives were most disparate: it had the highest mean ranking of the three teaching presence categories by hybrid students but the lowest mean ranking by online students. These findings can inform instructors’ approaches to the numerous modalities now available post pandemic, including their efforts to facilitate student discourse that will support a learning community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitating student discourse: Online and hybrid writing students’ perceptions of teaching presence\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Stillman-Webb ,&nbsp;Lyra Hilliard ,&nbsp;Mary K. Stewart ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines whether delivery format affects the degree to which students perceive teaching presence in their online and hybrid first-year writing (FYW) courses. In the Community of Inquiry (CoI) theoretical framework, teaching presence plays a role in creating a learning community through instructional design, discourse facilitation, and direct instruction. To measure the extent to which students perceived these elements of teaching presence, the Community of Inquiry in Writing Studies survey was administered to 669 students in online and hybrid sections of FYW at four universities.</p><p>Online and hybrid students demonstrated similar perceptions of teaching presence through individualized feedback and the instructor-student relationship, but they differed in their perceptions of group activities and the instructor-student-student relationship. Of the three categories of teaching presence, discourse facilitation was the one about which online and hybrid student perspectives were most disparate: it had the highest mean ranking of the three teaching presence categories by hybrid students but the lowest mean ranking by online students. These findings can inform instructors’ approaches to the numerous modalities now available post pandemic, including their efforts to facilitate student discourse that will support a learning community.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考察了授课形式是否会影响学生在其在线和混合一年级写作(FYW)课程中感知教学存在的程度。在探究社区(CoI)的理论框架中,教学存在通过教学设计、话语促进和直接教学在创建学习社区方面发挥着作用。为了衡量学生对这些教学元素的感知程度,写作研究调查社区对四所大学的669名FYW在线和混合部分的学生进行了调查。在线和混合学生通过个性化反馈和师生关系对教学存在的感知相似,但他们对团体活动和师生关系的感知不同。在三类教学存在中,话语促进是在线学生和混合学生观点最为不同的一类:在混合学生的三种教学存在类别中,话语便利的平均排名最高,但在线学生的平均排名最低。这些发现可以为教师提供疫情后现有的多种模式的方法,包括他们为促进学生话语所做的努力,以支持学习社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facilitating student discourse: Online and hybrid writing students’ perceptions of teaching presence

This study examines whether delivery format affects the degree to which students perceive teaching presence in their online and hybrid first-year writing (FYW) courses. In the Community of Inquiry (CoI) theoretical framework, teaching presence plays a role in creating a learning community through instructional design, discourse facilitation, and direct instruction. To measure the extent to which students perceived these elements of teaching presence, the Community of Inquiry in Writing Studies survey was administered to 669 students in online and hybrid sections of FYW at four universities.

Online and hybrid students demonstrated similar perceptions of teaching presence through individualized feedback and the instructor-student relationship, but they differed in their perceptions of group activities and the instructor-student-student relationship. Of the three categories of teaching presence, discourse facilitation was the one about which online and hybrid student perspectives were most disparate: it had the highest mean ranking of the three teaching presence categories by hybrid students but the lowest mean ranking by online students. These findings can inform instructors’ approaches to the numerous modalities now available post pandemic, including their efforts to facilitate student discourse that will support a learning community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1