高中生如何将语音转文本作为作文工具

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102775
Sarah Levine, Hsiaolin Hsieh, Emily Southerton, Rebecca Silverman
{"title":"高中生如何将语音转文本作为作文工具","authors":"Sarah Levine,&nbsp;Hsiaolin Hsieh,&nbsp;Emily Southerton,&nbsp;Rebecca Silverman","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Speech to text (STT) technology, also called voice recognition or speech recognition technology, automatically transcribes users’ speech to a computer screen. Research indicates that STT shows promise as an alternative mode of composition, supporting students in making fewer errors, writing more, and writing better. Much of this research takes place in elementary and middle schools, often focusing on students with identified learning disabilities. The current study extends STT research into general education high school classrooms, where students (</span><em>N</em><span> = 120) were invited to use it as much or as little as they wanted during one school year. We asked: Who used STT? Did subgroups, such as students labeled with learning disabilities, differ in their choices? When students chose to use STT, what kinds of writing did they do? Did STT compositions differ from non-STT compositions? Finally, what were students’ and teachers’ perceptions of STT? We analyzed field notes, interviews, surveys, and student writing with and without STT, and found mixed results: On average, students wrote more when they used STT than not. A little more than half of students found that STT eased the cognitive load of composition. A little less than half of students found that the tool constrained their composition. Some were put off by technical problems or embarrassment attendant with speaking out loud in class. Students’ choices to use STT correlated with special education designation, but not other designations. Despite students’ mixed reports, teachers were consistently positive about STT and planned to use it in future classes.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102775"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How high school students used speech-to-text as a composition tool\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Levine,&nbsp;Hsiaolin Hsieh,&nbsp;Emily Southerton,&nbsp;Rebecca Silverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Speech to text (STT) technology, also called voice recognition or speech recognition technology, automatically transcribes users’ speech to a computer screen. Research indicates that STT shows promise as an alternative mode of composition, supporting students in making fewer errors, writing more, and writing better. Much of this research takes place in elementary and middle schools, often focusing on students with identified learning disabilities. The current study extends STT research into general education high school classrooms, where students (</span><em>N</em><span> = 120) were invited to use it as much or as little as they wanted during one school year. We asked: Who used STT? Did subgroups, such as students labeled with learning disabilities, differ in their choices? When students chose to use STT, what kinds of writing did they do? Did STT compositions differ from non-STT compositions? Finally, what were students’ and teachers’ perceptions of STT? We analyzed field notes, interviews, surveys, and student writing with and without STT, and found mixed results: On average, students wrote more when they used STT than not. A little more than half of students found that STT eased the cognitive load of composition. A little less than half of students found that the tool constrained their composition. Some were put off by technical problems or embarrassment attendant with speaking out loud in class. Students’ choices to use STT correlated with special education designation, but not other designations. Despite students’ mixed reports, teachers were consistently positive about STT and planned to use it in future classes.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语音到文本(STT)技术,也称为语音识别或语音识别技术,自动将用户的语音转录到计算机屏幕上。研究表明,STT作为一种可供选择的作文模式,有助于学生减少错误,多写文章,写得更好。这项研究大多发生在中小学,通常关注有学习障碍的学生。目前的研究将STT研究扩展到了普通教育高中的课堂上,在那里,学生(N=120)被邀请在一学年内随心所欲地使用STT。我们问:谁使用STT?亚组,比如被贴上学习障碍标签的学生,在选择上是否有所不同?当学生选择使用STT时,他们做了什么样的写作?STT成分与非STT成分不同吗?最后,学生和教师对STT的看法是什么?我们分析了现场笔记、访谈、调查以及有无STT的学生写作,发现结果喜忧参半:平均而言,学生在使用STT时写得更多。略多于一半的学生发现STT减轻了作文的认知负荷。不到一半的学生发现该工具限制了他们的作文。有些人因为技术问题或在课堂上大声说话而感到尴尬。学生使用STT的选择与特殊教育名称相关,但与其他名称无关。尽管学生们的报告好坏参半,但老师们对STT一直持积极态度,并计划在未来的课堂上使用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How high school students used speech-to-text as a composition tool

Speech to text (STT) technology, also called voice recognition or speech recognition technology, automatically transcribes users’ speech to a computer screen. Research indicates that STT shows promise as an alternative mode of composition, supporting students in making fewer errors, writing more, and writing better. Much of this research takes place in elementary and middle schools, often focusing on students with identified learning disabilities. The current study extends STT research into general education high school classrooms, where students (N = 120) were invited to use it as much or as little as they wanted during one school year. We asked: Who used STT? Did subgroups, such as students labeled with learning disabilities, differ in their choices? When students chose to use STT, what kinds of writing did they do? Did STT compositions differ from non-STT compositions? Finally, what were students’ and teachers’ perceptions of STT? We analyzed field notes, interviews, surveys, and student writing with and without STT, and found mixed results: On average, students wrote more when they used STT than not. A little more than half of students found that STT eased the cognitive load of composition. A little less than half of students found that the tool constrained their composition. Some were put off by technical problems or embarrassment attendant with speaking out loud in class. Students’ choices to use STT correlated with special education designation, but not other designations. Despite students’ mixed reports, teachers were consistently positive about STT and planned to use it in future classes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1