健康专业学生智力谦逊差异的探索性研究:对跨专业教育与合作的启示

Lisa T. Hong , Paul Gavaza , Jessa Koch , Ike de la Peña
{"title":"健康专业学生智力谦逊差异的探索性研究:对跨专业教育与合作的启示","authors":"Lisa T. Hong ,&nbsp;Paul Gavaza ,&nbsp;Jessa Koch ,&nbsp;Ike de la Peña","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Intellectual humility (IH), characterized by four dimensions (open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, engagement, and corrigibility) could promote interprofessional education<span> (IPE) and collaboration (IPC). As this is an understudied concept, we aimed to examine IH differences among various health professional students. Modified surveys assessed student perspectives of IPE/IPC and simultaneously incorporated IH-related themes. Student IH levels (overall and by each IH dimension) were compared by profession. Surveys were completed by 290 students (75 pharmacy, 179 medical, and 36 </span></span>physician assistant<span><span> [PA]). Mean IH scores differed across professions, with medical students scoring lowest on most items. When categorized into 4 IH dimensions, significant differences were found across professions on measures of open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, and engagement (p &lt; 0.05) with PA students scoring significantly higher than medical students. </span>Pharmacy students scored higher than medical students only on engagement. This exploratory analysis found probable differences in IH levels among health professional students based on their perspectives on IPE/IPC.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An explorative study on intellectual humility differences among health professional students: Implications for interprofessional education and collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Lisa T. Hong ,&nbsp;Paul Gavaza ,&nbsp;Jessa Koch ,&nbsp;Ike de la Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Intellectual humility (IH), characterized by four dimensions (open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, engagement, and corrigibility) could promote interprofessional education<span> (IPE) and collaboration (IPC). As this is an understudied concept, we aimed to examine IH differences among various health professional students. Modified surveys assessed student perspectives of IPE/IPC and simultaneously incorporated IH-related themes. Student IH levels (overall and by each IH dimension) were compared by profession. Surveys were completed by 290 students (75 pharmacy, 179 medical, and 36 </span></span>physician assistant<span><span> [PA]). Mean IH scores differed across professions, with medical students scoring lowest on most items. When categorized into 4 IH dimensions, significant differences were found across professions on measures of open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, and engagement (p &lt; 0.05) with PA students scoring significantly higher than medical students. </span>Pharmacy students scored higher than medical students only on engagement. This exploratory analysis found probable differences in IH levels among health professional students based on their perspectives on IPE/IPC.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智力谦逊(IH)具有四个维度(思想开放、智力谦逊、参与和可包容)的特征,可以促进跨专业教育(IPE)和合作(IPC)。由于这是一个研究不足的概念,我们旨在研究不同健康专业学生之间的IH差异。修改后的调查评估了学生对IPE/IPC的看法,同时纳入了与IH相关的主题。学生的IH水平(总体和每个IH维度)按专业进行比较。调查由290名学生完成(75名药学、179名医学和36名助理医师[PA])。不同专业的平均IH得分不同,医学生在大多数项目上得分最低。当被分为4个IH维度时,不同职业在思想开放、智力谦逊和参与度方面存在显著差异(p<;0.05),PA学生的得分显著高于医学生。仅在参与度方面,药学专业的学生得分高于医学专业的学生。这项探索性分析发现,基于他们对IPE/IPC的看法,卫生专业学生的IH水平可能存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An explorative study on intellectual humility differences among health professional students: Implications for interprofessional education and collaboration

Intellectual humility (IH), characterized by four dimensions (open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, engagement, and corrigibility) could promote interprofessional education (IPE) and collaboration (IPC). As this is an understudied concept, we aimed to examine IH differences among various health professional students. Modified surveys assessed student perspectives of IPE/IPC and simultaneously incorporated IH-related themes. Student IH levels (overall and by each IH dimension) were compared by profession. Surveys were completed by 290 students (75 pharmacy, 179 medical, and 36 physician assistant [PA]). Mean IH scores differed across professions, with medical students scoring lowest on most items. When categorized into 4 IH dimensions, significant differences were found across professions on measures of open-mindedness, intellectual modesty, and engagement (p < 0.05) with PA students scoring significantly higher than medical students. Pharmacy students scored higher than medical students only on engagement. This exploratory analysis found probable differences in IH levels among health professional students based on their perspectives on IPE/IPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1