在应对气候变化的斗争中,金融部门是切断了与石油行业的长期联系,还是仅仅掩饰了它们?

Franco Ruzzenenti , Klaus Hubacek , Giampaolo Gabbi
{"title":"在应对气候变化的斗争中,金融部门是切断了与石油行业的长期联系,还是仅仅掩饰了它们?","authors":"Franco Ruzzenenti ,&nbsp;Klaus Hubacek ,&nbsp;Giampaolo Gabbi","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>At a time when the links that bind the oil industry – both corporate and state-owned - to finance and governments seemed inextricable and unquestionable, some major changes have occurred that have prompted major financial players and governments to seek a separation strategy. From the Paris Agreement to the change of administration in the United States, the wind suddenly seems to be blowing in the opposite direction, and many banks change course. The UN-convened Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) is one prominent example of this new trend. However, banks are only one part of this complex and varied landscape of global finance, which, among institutional investors, includes investment funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, insurance funds, pension plans and ETFs (exchange-traded funds). Despite the promise to divest or reduce investments, global finance still holds profound ties with the fossil fuel sector. The high energy prices due to the war in the Ukraine and concerns over energy security are seemingly strengthening these ties. We provide an insight of the complexity of these interlinkages and explain to what extent the domain of public governance is trying to exert (still insufficient) control over the financial sector under the scope of climate mitigation policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the fight against climate change, did the financial sector cut secular ties with the oil industry or merely camouflage them?\",\"authors\":\"Franco Ruzzenenti ,&nbsp;Klaus Hubacek ,&nbsp;Giampaolo Gabbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>At a time when the links that bind the oil industry – both corporate and state-owned - to finance and governments seemed inextricable and unquestionable, some major changes have occurred that have prompted major financial players and governments to seek a separation strategy. From the Paris Agreement to the change of administration in the United States, the wind suddenly seems to be blowing in the opposite direction, and many banks change course. The UN-convened Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) is one prominent example of this new trend. However, banks are only one part of this complex and varied landscape of global finance, which, among institutional investors, includes investment funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, insurance funds, pension plans and ETFs (exchange-traded funds). Despite the promise to divest or reduce investments, global finance still holds profound ties with the fossil fuel sector. The high energy prices due to the war in the Ukraine and concerns over energy security are seemingly strengthening these ties. We provide an insight of the complexity of these interlinkages and explain to what extent the domain of public governance is trying to exert (still insufficient) control over the financial sector under the scope of climate mitigation policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当石油行业(包括企业和国有)与金融和政府的联系似乎是不可分割和毫无疑问的时候,一些重大变化已经发生,促使主要金融参与者和政府寻求分离战略。从《巴黎协定》到美国政府更迭,风向似乎突然相反,许多银行改变了方向。联合国召集的净零银行联盟就是这一新趋势的一个突出例子。然而,银行只是全球金融复杂多样格局的一部分,在机构投资者中,全球金融包括投资基金、对冲基金、共同基金、保险基金、养老金计划和交易所交易基金。尽管承诺撤资或减少投资,但全球金融仍与化石燃料行业有着深厚的联系。乌克兰战争导致的高能源价格和对能源安全的担忧似乎正在加强这些关系。我们深入了解了这些相互联系的复杂性,并解释了在气候缓解政策的范围内,公共治理领域试图在多大程度上对金融部门施加(仍然不够)控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In the fight against climate change, did the financial sector cut secular ties with the oil industry or merely camouflage them?

At a time when the links that bind the oil industry – both corporate and state-owned - to finance and governments seemed inextricable and unquestionable, some major changes have occurred that have prompted major financial players and governments to seek a separation strategy. From the Paris Agreement to the change of administration in the United States, the wind suddenly seems to be blowing in the opposite direction, and many banks change course. The UN-convened Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) is one prominent example of this new trend. However, banks are only one part of this complex and varied landscape of global finance, which, among institutional investors, includes investment funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, insurance funds, pension plans and ETFs (exchange-traded funds). Despite the promise to divest or reduce investments, global finance still holds profound ties with the fossil fuel sector. The high energy prices due to the war in the Ukraine and concerns over energy security are seemingly strengthening these ties. We provide an insight of the complexity of these interlinkages and explain to what extent the domain of public governance is trying to exert (still insufficient) control over the financial sector under the scope of climate mitigation policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive analysis of sustainable fertilizer-related publications within the context of circular economy: Insights from the field of business management Strategic marketing of sustainable fashion: Exploring approaches and contradictions in the positioning of fashion rental Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade Consumers perspectives on biobased products: A scoping review Adopting a green strategy and related practices: Lessons from small food establishments in an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1