城市循环经济情景下的后果二氧化碳足迹分析

Yiwen Liu , Leonardo Rosado , Alexandra Wu , Nelli Melolinna , Johan Holmqvist , Brian Fath
{"title":"城市循环经济情景下的后果二氧化碳足迹分析","authors":"Yiwen Liu ,&nbsp;Leonardo Rosado ,&nbsp;Alexandra Wu ,&nbsp;Nelli Melolinna ,&nbsp;Johan Holmqvist ,&nbsp;Brian Fath","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cities concentrate a large amount of people and activities thus being responsible for large amounts of resources being consumed which generate significant impact footprints contributing to climate change both directly and indirectly. In the meantime, circular economy is seen a promising concept to improve resource efficiency. Circular economy strategies are an emerging and important paradigm that can have an important effect in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p><p>This study aims at evaluating how circular economy strategies can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in cities with different contexts to find similarities and differences between them. The studied cities are Beijing, Shanghai, Vienna, and Malmö.</p><p>A scenario analysis study is done for two scenarios: 1) Business-As-Usual scenario (BAU) and 2) Circular Economy scenario (CE) from year 2017–2050, using multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis. The most CO<sub>2</sub>-intensive Exiobase sectors associated with downstream consumption in households and government were identified as CO<sub>2</sub> emission hotspots, and emission reduction targets were identified and applied to these sectors.</p><p>The main results from the study show that although Vienna and Malmö have applied sustainability strategies for quite some time, the results do not show that CE strategies work better in the European cities compared with Chinese cities. The results also suggest that the greatest potential and effectiveness in reducing consumption lies in the sectors of energy use and materials consumption for all cities. It can also be seen that CE scenarios have higher potential for CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction when compared to the BAU scenarios but the reduction level in Shanghai and Malmö is weaker compared to Vienna and Beijing, which indicates the effectiveness of current CE strategies in reducing Beijing and Vienna's emissions. It also suggests that for Shanghai and Malmö, more ambitious CE strategies should be considered. Finally, comparing the distribution of emissions among the four cities it can be seen that consumption of Beijing, Shanghai and Vienna relies highly on domestic production whilst Malmö is more dependent on international production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequence CO2 footprint analysis of circular economy scenarios in cities\",\"authors\":\"Yiwen Liu ,&nbsp;Leonardo Rosado ,&nbsp;Alexandra Wu ,&nbsp;Nelli Melolinna ,&nbsp;Johan Holmqvist ,&nbsp;Brian Fath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cities concentrate a large amount of people and activities thus being responsible for large amounts of resources being consumed which generate significant impact footprints contributing to climate change both directly and indirectly. In the meantime, circular economy is seen a promising concept to improve resource efficiency. Circular economy strategies are an emerging and important paradigm that can have an important effect in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p><p>This study aims at evaluating how circular economy strategies can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in cities with different contexts to find similarities and differences between them. The studied cities are Beijing, Shanghai, Vienna, and Malmö.</p><p>A scenario analysis study is done for two scenarios: 1) Business-As-Usual scenario (BAU) and 2) Circular Economy scenario (CE) from year 2017–2050, using multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis. The most CO<sub>2</sub>-intensive Exiobase sectors associated with downstream consumption in households and government were identified as CO<sub>2</sub> emission hotspots, and emission reduction targets were identified and applied to these sectors.</p><p>The main results from the study show that although Vienna and Malmö have applied sustainability strategies for quite some time, the results do not show that CE strategies work better in the European cities compared with Chinese cities. The results also suggest that the greatest potential and effectiveness in reducing consumption lies in the sectors of energy use and materials consumption for all cities. It can also be seen that CE scenarios have higher potential for CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction when compared to the BAU scenarios but the reduction level in Shanghai and Malmö is weaker compared to Vienna and Beijing, which indicates the effectiveness of current CE strategies in reducing Beijing and Vienna's emissions. It also suggests that for Shanghai and Malmö, more ambitious CE strategies should be considered. Finally, comparing the distribution of emissions among the four cities it can be seen that consumption of Beijing, Shanghai and Vienna relies highly on domestic production whilst Malmö is more dependent on international production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市集中了大量的人口和活动,因此消耗了大量的资源,这些资源产生了直接和间接导致气候变化的重大影响。同时,循环经济被认为是提高资源效率的一个很有前途的概念。循环经济战略是一种新兴的重要模式,可以在减少二氧化碳排放方面发挥重要作用。本研究旨在评估循环经济战略如何在不同背景下的城市中减少二氧化碳排放,以找出它们之间的异同。研究的城市包括北京、上海、维也纳和马尔默。对两种情景进行了情景分析研究:1)商业照常情景(BAU)和2)2017-2050年循环经济情景(CE),使用多区域投入产出(MRIO)分析。与家庭和政府下游消费相关的二氧化碳密集型出口企业部门被确定为二氧化碳排放热点,减排目标被确定并应用于这些部门。研究的主要结果表明,尽管维也纳和马尔默已经应用可持续发展战略相当长一段时间了,但结果并没有表明,与中国城市相比,欧洲城市的CE战略效果更好。研究结果还表明,减少消费的最大潜力和有效性在于所有城市的能源使用和材料消耗部门。还可以看出,与BAU情景相比,CE情景具有更高的二氧化碳减排潜力,但与维也纳和北京相比,上海和马尔默的减排水平较弱,这表明当前CE战略在减少北京和维也纳排放方面的有效性。它还建议,对于上海和马尔默,应该考虑更雄心勃勃的CE战略。最后,比较四个城市的排放分布可以看出,北京、上海和维也纳的消费高度依赖国内生产,而马尔默更依赖国际生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consequence CO2 footprint analysis of circular economy scenarios in cities

Cities concentrate a large amount of people and activities thus being responsible for large amounts of resources being consumed which generate significant impact footprints contributing to climate change both directly and indirectly. In the meantime, circular economy is seen a promising concept to improve resource efficiency. Circular economy strategies are an emerging and important paradigm that can have an important effect in reducing CO2 emissions.

This study aims at evaluating how circular economy strategies can reduce CO2 emissions in cities with different contexts to find similarities and differences between them. The studied cities are Beijing, Shanghai, Vienna, and Malmö.

A scenario analysis study is done for two scenarios: 1) Business-As-Usual scenario (BAU) and 2) Circular Economy scenario (CE) from year 2017–2050, using multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis. The most CO2-intensive Exiobase sectors associated with downstream consumption in households and government were identified as CO2 emission hotspots, and emission reduction targets were identified and applied to these sectors.

The main results from the study show that although Vienna and Malmö have applied sustainability strategies for quite some time, the results do not show that CE strategies work better in the European cities compared with Chinese cities. The results also suggest that the greatest potential and effectiveness in reducing consumption lies in the sectors of energy use and materials consumption for all cities. It can also be seen that CE scenarios have higher potential for CO2 emissions reduction when compared to the BAU scenarios but the reduction level in Shanghai and Malmö is weaker compared to Vienna and Beijing, which indicates the effectiveness of current CE strategies in reducing Beijing and Vienna's emissions. It also suggests that for Shanghai and Malmö, more ambitious CE strategies should be considered. Finally, comparing the distribution of emissions among the four cities it can be seen that consumption of Beijing, Shanghai and Vienna relies highly on domestic production whilst Malmö is more dependent on international production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive analysis of sustainable fertilizer-related publications within the context of circular economy: Insights from the field of business management Strategic marketing of sustainable fashion: Exploring approaches and contradictions in the positioning of fashion rental Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade Consumers perspectives on biobased products: A scoping review Adopting a green strategy and related practices: Lessons from small food establishments in an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1