“每个人都在追求自己的梦想”:谷歌和微软的教育技术话语

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100138
Vittorio Marone, Bruna Damiana Heinsfeld
{"title":"“每个人都在追求自己的梦想”:谷歌和微软的教育技术话语","authors":"Vittorio Marone,&nbsp;Bruna Damiana Heinsfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large corporations active in the field of educational technology shape needs, perceptions, attitudes, expectations, and values related to technology use in education. In order to better understand how these corporations frame the role of technology in educational settings, it is crucial to critically analyze how they present and promote their products and services. Through a discourse analysis approach, this study examined the homepages of two of the major players in educational technology, namely Google for Education and Microsoft Education. Findings show that the discourse put forth by these companies positions technology as a transformative agent that can revitalize a stagnant educational system. In this picture, teachers and students are presented as incomplete and lost beings on the path towards an alarmingly indeterminate future, which can be only overcome by the technologies and services offered by these corporations. The potential of these technologies is presented as limitless, low-cost, for everyone, and available anywhere and anytime. In this deterministic “technology as a solution” framework, technology is depicted as an inevitable choice for the advancement of people and society. This study shows that, by critically approaching and analyzing corporate discourse, students, teachers, and other stakeholders can develop an outlook that cuts through marketing strategies and the hype surrounding learning technologies. In turn, this can promote reflective practices, support decision-making processes, and redefine expectations related to the role of technology in education and society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Everyone pursuing their dreams”: Google's and Microsoft's discourse on educational technology\",\"authors\":\"Vittorio Marone,&nbsp;Bruna Damiana Heinsfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Large corporations active in the field of educational technology shape needs, perceptions, attitudes, expectations, and values related to technology use in education. In order to better understand how these corporations frame the role of technology in educational settings, it is crucial to critically analyze how they present and promote their products and services. Through a discourse analysis approach, this study examined the homepages of two of the major players in educational technology, namely Google for Education and Microsoft Education. Findings show that the discourse put forth by these companies positions technology as a transformative agent that can revitalize a stagnant educational system. In this picture, teachers and students are presented as incomplete and lost beings on the path towards an alarmingly indeterminate future, which can be only overcome by the technologies and services offered by these corporations. The potential of these technologies is presented as limitless, low-cost, for everyone, and available anywhere and anytime. In this deterministic “technology as a solution” framework, technology is depicted as an inevitable choice for the advancement of people and society. This study shows that, by critically approaching and analyzing corporate discourse, students, teachers, and other stakeholders can develop an outlook that cuts through marketing strategies and the hype surrounding learning technologies. In turn, this can promote reflective practices, support decision-making processes, and redefine expectations related to the role of technology in education and society.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

活跃在教育技术领域的大公司塑造了与教育技术使用相关的需求、观念、态度、期望和价值观。为了更好地理解这些公司如何在教育环境中界定技术的作用,关键是要批判性地分析他们如何展示和推广他们的产品和服务。通过话语分析方法,本研究考察了教育技术领域的两个主要参与者,即谷歌教育和微软教育的主页。研究结果表明,这些公司提出的话语将技术定位为一种变革性的媒介,可以振兴停滞不前的教育系统。在这张照片中,教师和学生被描绘成一个不完整和迷失的人,他们正在走向一个令人担忧的不确定的未来,只有这些公司提供的技术和服务才能克服这个未来。这些技术的潜力是无限的、低成本的、面向所有人的、随时随地可用的。在这种确定性的“技术即解决方案”框架中,技术被描述为人类和社会进步的必然选择。这项研究表明,通过批判性地处理和分析企业话语,学生、教师和其他利益相关者可以形成一种观点,这种观点可以穿透营销策略和围绕学习技术的炒作。反过来,这可以促进反思实践,支持决策过程,并重新定义与技术在教育和社会中的作用相关的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Everyone pursuing their dreams”: Google's and Microsoft's discourse on educational technology

Large corporations active in the field of educational technology shape needs, perceptions, attitudes, expectations, and values related to technology use in education. In order to better understand how these corporations frame the role of technology in educational settings, it is crucial to critically analyze how they present and promote their products and services. Through a discourse analysis approach, this study examined the homepages of two of the major players in educational technology, namely Google for Education and Microsoft Education. Findings show that the discourse put forth by these companies positions technology as a transformative agent that can revitalize a stagnant educational system. In this picture, teachers and students are presented as incomplete and lost beings on the path towards an alarmingly indeterminate future, which can be only overcome by the technologies and services offered by these corporations. The potential of these technologies is presented as limitless, low-cost, for everyone, and available anywhere and anytime. In this deterministic “technology as a solution” framework, technology is depicted as an inevitable choice for the advancement of people and society. This study shows that, by critically approaching and analyzing corporate discourse, students, teachers, and other stakeholders can develop an outlook that cuts through marketing strategies and the hype surrounding learning technologies. In turn, this can promote reflective practices, support decision-making processes, and redefine expectations related to the role of technology in education and society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1