TKA中股骨组件旋转的优化:髁后角和髁扭转角的作用

Patricio Dumlao III , Hiroshi Fujii , Yutaka Suetomi , Atsunori Tokushige , Kiminori Yukata , Takashi Sakai
{"title":"TKA中股骨组件旋转的优化:髁后角和髁扭转角的作用","authors":"Patricio Dumlao III ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Fujii ,&nbsp;Yutaka Suetomi ,&nbsp;Atsunori Tokushige ,&nbsp;Kiminori Yukata ,&nbsp;Takashi Sakai","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Femoral component rotation (FCR) is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Currently, the optimal method to select FCR is unknown due to patient anatomy variation. Addressing the variability of femoral component rotation is critical to optimizing TKA outcomes and patient satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to identify outlier frequency and evaluate malrotation risk reduction by setting anatomic limits for FCR selection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis requiring TKA were included and categorized as normal rotation, internal rotation outlier, and external rotation outlier based on their expected FCR calculated intraoperatively using the modified gap balancing technique with a tensioning device. The computed FCR was then referenced to their Posterior Condylar Angle (PCA) and Condylar Twist Angle (CTA). The postoperative FCR and 1, 2-, and 5-years functional scores were also measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-one knees (71%) were within the limits of PCA and CTA. The combined outlier frequency is 29%. The mean computed FCRs are 4.4° (±1.5), −1° (±2.6), and 8.0° (±3.4) for the normal, internal rotation, and external rotation groups, respectively. Whereas after setting the limits, the postoperative FCRs are 3.1° (±1.5), 3.9° (±1.7), and 2.5° (±1.4) for the three groups, respectively. The relative risk reduction against malrotation was 65%. At 1, 2, and 5 years post-TKA, all groups showed significant functional improvement, with no significant differences in functional outcomes between the normal and outlier groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of lower and upper limits for selecting the FCR based on CTA and PCA can be a valuable approach to reducing malrotation risk and achieving satisfactory functional outcomes in TKA. Addressing the individual patient's anatomic limits contributes to improved TKA outcomes and patient-specific component alignment, thus enhancing the overall success of the procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000312/pdfft?md5=982146bd3f2feccfee4a4c29dc85492d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705123000312-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing femoral component rotation in TKA: The role of posterior condylar angle and condylar twist angle\",\"authors\":\"Patricio Dumlao III ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Fujii ,&nbsp;Yutaka Suetomi ,&nbsp;Atsunori Tokushige ,&nbsp;Kiminori Yukata ,&nbsp;Takashi Sakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Femoral component rotation (FCR) is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Currently, the optimal method to select FCR is unknown due to patient anatomy variation. Addressing the variability of femoral component rotation is critical to optimizing TKA outcomes and patient satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to identify outlier frequency and evaluate malrotation risk reduction by setting anatomic limits for FCR selection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis requiring TKA were included and categorized as normal rotation, internal rotation outlier, and external rotation outlier based on their expected FCR calculated intraoperatively using the modified gap balancing technique with a tensioning device. The computed FCR was then referenced to their Posterior Condylar Angle (PCA) and Condylar Twist Angle (CTA). The postoperative FCR and 1, 2-, and 5-years functional scores were also measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-one knees (71%) were within the limits of PCA and CTA. The combined outlier frequency is 29%. The mean computed FCRs are 4.4° (±1.5), −1° (±2.6), and 8.0° (±3.4) for the normal, internal rotation, and external rotation groups, respectively. Whereas after setting the limits, the postoperative FCRs are 3.1° (±1.5), 3.9° (±1.7), and 2.5° (±1.4) for the three groups, respectively. The relative risk reduction against malrotation was 65%. At 1, 2, and 5 years post-TKA, all groups showed significant functional improvement, with no significant differences in functional outcomes between the normal and outlier groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of lower and upper limits for selecting the FCR based on CTA and PCA can be a valuable approach to reducing malrotation risk and achieving satisfactory functional outcomes in TKA. Addressing the individual patient's anatomic limits contributes to improved TKA outcomes and patient-specific component alignment, thus enhancing the overall success of the procedure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 214-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000312/pdfft?md5=982146bd3f2feccfee4a4c29dc85492d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705123000312-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的股骨组件旋转(FCR)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)的关键。目前,由于患者解剖结构的变化,选择FCR的最佳方法尚不清楚。解决股骨组件旋转的可变性对于优化TKA结果和患者满意度至关重要。在本研究中,我们旨在通过设置FCR选择的解剖极限来识别异常频率并评估旋转不良风险的降低。方法将100例需要TKA的终末期膝关节骨性关节炎患者纳入研究,并根据术中使用改良的带张力装置的间隙平衡技术计算的预期FCR,将其分为正常旋转、内旋转异常值和外旋转异常值。计算的FCR随后参考他们的后髁角(PCA)和髁扭转角(CTA)。还测量了术后FCR和1年、2年和5年的功能评分。结果71个膝关节(71%)在PCA和CTA范围内。组合异常频率为29%。正常、内旋和外旋组的平均计算FCR分别为4.4°(±1.5)、−1°(±2.6)和8.0°(±3.4)。设定界限后,三组术后FCR分别为3.1°(±1.5)、3.9°(±1.7)和2.5°(±1.4)。旋转不良的相对风险降低了65%。TKA术后1、2和5年,所有组均显示出显著的功能改善,正常组和异常组之间的功能结果没有显著差异。结论基于CTA和PCA选择FCR的下限和上限是降低TKA旋转不良风险和获得满意功能结果的一种有价值的方法。解决个别患者的解剖极限有助于改善TKA结果和患者特定组件的对齐,从而提高手术的整体成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing femoral component rotation in TKA: The role of posterior condylar angle and condylar twist angle

Purpose

Femoral component rotation (FCR) is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Currently, the optimal method to select FCR is unknown due to patient anatomy variation. Addressing the variability of femoral component rotation is critical to optimizing TKA outcomes and patient satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to identify outlier frequency and evaluate malrotation risk reduction by setting anatomic limits for FCR selection.

Methods

One hundred patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis requiring TKA were included and categorized as normal rotation, internal rotation outlier, and external rotation outlier based on their expected FCR calculated intraoperatively using the modified gap balancing technique with a tensioning device. The computed FCR was then referenced to their Posterior Condylar Angle (PCA) and Condylar Twist Angle (CTA). The postoperative FCR and 1, 2-, and 5-years functional scores were also measured.

Results

Seventy-one knees (71%) were within the limits of PCA and CTA. The combined outlier frequency is 29%. The mean computed FCRs are 4.4° (±1.5), −1° (±2.6), and 8.0° (±3.4) for the normal, internal rotation, and external rotation groups, respectively. Whereas after setting the limits, the postoperative FCRs are 3.1° (±1.5), 3.9° (±1.7), and 2.5° (±1.4) for the three groups, respectively. The relative risk reduction against malrotation was 65%. At 1, 2, and 5 years post-TKA, all groups showed significant functional improvement, with no significant differences in functional outcomes between the normal and outlier groups.

Conclusion

The use of lower and upper limits for selecting the FCR based on CTA and PCA can be a valuable approach to reducing malrotation risk and achieving satisfactory functional outcomes in TKA. Addressing the individual patient's anatomic limits contributes to improved TKA outcomes and patient-specific component alignment, thus enhancing the overall success of the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention of surgical site infection: need to focus on the enemy within Appreciation to reviewers in 2024 Therapeutic strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures based on three classification systems Examination of intra-operative blood loss on the first side to perform simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty without allogeneic blood transfusion Comparison of cup placement accuracy using the navigation in total hip arthroplasty between three models using inverse probability of treatment weighting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1