无创脑刺激治疗焦虑症的循证综述

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.01.001
Katia Nunes Sá , Rachel Fontes Baptista , Livia Shirahige , Laís B. Razza , Mateus Nogueira , Maria Helena Faria Coura , Leonardo Afonso-Santos , Clarice Tanaka , Abrahão Fontes Baptista , Katia Monte-Silva , André R. Brunoni
{"title":"无创脑刺激治疗焦虑症的循证综述","authors":"Katia Nunes Sá ,&nbsp;Rachel Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Livia Shirahige ,&nbsp;Laís B. Razza ,&nbsp;Mateus Nogueira ,&nbsp;Maria Helena Faria Coura ,&nbsp;Leonardo Afonso-Santos ,&nbsp;Clarice Tanaka ,&nbsp;Abrahão Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Katia Monte-Silva ,&nbsp;André R. Brunoni","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p><span>Although several meta-analyses have suggested the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) mainly in prefrontal brain areas to treat </span>mental disorders<span>, no synthetic approach has been performed for other psychiatric disorders rather than depression. The objective is to assess the available evidence of NIBS in the treatment of anxiety disorders.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An umbrella review (CRD42021239577) was performed only looking for reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials using a source strategy MeSH keywords in MEDLINE through Pubmed by two independent researchers. The effects of different methods of NIBS in anxiety disorders were assessed using the PICO strategy. The methodological quality was evaluated using AMSTAR-2 and certainty of evidence using the GRADE-pro framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>From 136 screening meta-analyses, 16 from 14 studies were included in the final analysis. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and </span>Obsessive Compulsive Disorder<span> (OCD) respond best to low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while </span></span>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has the largest effect size at high frequency rTMS. Panic Disorder (PD) has no evidence for clinical use of NIBS. There were not identified meta-analyses about other anxiety disorders. In general, the included studies had good methodological quality, but low to moderate evidence for clinical recommendation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Available evidence reveals NIBS as an effective and safe approach to treat GAD, PTSD and OCD with low recommendation level to clinical application. A great heterogeneity of studies indicates the necessity to develop new randomized clinical trials applying NIBS to treat those and other mental disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based umbrella review of non-invasive brain stimulation in anxiety disorders\",\"authors\":\"Katia Nunes Sá ,&nbsp;Rachel Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Livia Shirahige ,&nbsp;Laís B. Razza ,&nbsp;Mateus Nogueira ,&nbsp;Maria Helena Faria Coura ,&nbsp;Leonardo Afonso-Santos ,&nbsp;Clarice Tanaka ,&nbsp;Abrahão Fontes Baptista ,&nbsp;Katia Monte-Silva ,&nbsp;André R. Brunoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p><span>Although several meta-analyses have suggested the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) mainly in prefrontal brain areas to treat </span>mental disorders<span>, no synthetic approach has been performed for other psychiatric disorders rather than depression. The objective is to assess the available evidence of NIBS in the treatment of anxiety disorders.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An umbrella review (CRD42021239577) was performed only looking for reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials using a source strategy MeSH keywords in MEDLINE through Pubmed by two independent researchers. The effects of different methods of NIBS in anxiety disorders were assessed using the PICO strategy. The methodological quality was evaluated using AMSTAR-2 and certainty of evidence using the GRADE-pro framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>From 136 screening meta-analyses, 16 from 14 studies were included in the final analysis. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and </span>Obsessive Compulsive Disorder<span> (OCD) respond best to low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while </span></span>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has the largest effect size at high frequency rTMS. Panic Disorder (PD) has no evidence for clinical use of NIBS. There were not identified meta-analyses about other anxiety disorders. In general, the included studies had good methodological quality, but low to moderate evidence for clinical recommendation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Available evidence reveals NIBS as an effective and safe approach to treat GAD, PTSD and OCD with low recommendation level to clinical application. A great heterogeneity of studies indicates the necessity to develop new randomized clinical trials applying NIBS to treat those and other mental disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616323000101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616323000101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目的尽管几项荟萃分析表明,主要在前额叶区域进行无创脑刺激(NIBS)治疗精神障碍的疗效,但除抑郁症外,还没有对其他精神障碍进行综合治疗。目的是评估NIBS在治疗焦虑症方面的可用证据。方法由两名独立研究人员在MEDLINE和Pubmed中使用源策略MeSH关键字,进行了一项总括性综述(CRD42021239577),仅寻找随机临床试验的荟萃分析综述。使用PICO策略评估不同NIBS方法对焦虑症的影响。方法学质量使用AMSTAR-2进行评估,证据确定性使用GRADE pro框架进行评估。结果在136项筛选荟萃分析中,14项研究中有16项纳入最终分析。广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和强迫症(OCD)对低频重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的反应最好,而创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在高频rTMS下的影响最大。惊恐障碍(PD)没有NIBS临床应用的证据。没有关于其他焦虑症的荟萃分析。总体而言,纳入的研究具有良好的方法学质量,但临床推荐的证据较低至中等。结论现有证据表明,NIBS是治疗GAD、PTSD和OCD的一种有效、安全的方法,临床应用推荐水平较低。研究的巨大异质性表明,有必要开发新的随机临床试验,应用NIBS治疗这些和其他精神障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based umbrella review of non-invasive brain stimulation in anxiety disorders

Background and objectives

Although several meta-analyses have suggested the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) mainly in prefrontal brain areas to treat mental disorders, no synthetic approach has been performed for other psychiatric disorders rather than depression. The objective is to assess the available evidence of NIBS in the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Methods

An umbrella review (CRD42021239577) was performed only looking for reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials using a source strategy MeSH keywords in MEDLINE through Pubmed by two independent researchers. The effects of different methods of NIBS in anxiety disorders were assessed using the PICO strategy. The methodological quality was evaluated using AMSTAR-2 and certainty of evidence using the GRADE-pro framework.

Results

From 136 screening meta-analyses, 16 from 14 studies were included in the final analysis. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) respond best to low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), while Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has the largest effect size at high frequency rTMS. Panic Disorder (PD) has no evidence for clinical use of NIBS. There were not identified meta-analyses about other anxiety disorders. In general, the included studies had good methodological quality, but low to moderate evidence for clinical recommendation.

Conclusion

Available evidence reveals NIBS as an effective and safe approach to treat GAD, PTSD and OCD with low recommendation level to clinical application. A great heterogeneity of studies indicates the necessity to develop new randomized clinical trials applying NIBS to treat those and other mental disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
期刊最新文献
Psychopathological and cardiometabolic efficacy of a nutritional education intervention based on symbiotics in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Two-arm Randomised Clinical Trial Is it possible to circumnavigate the APIcalypse? On challenges to study mental health in the age of digitalization and AI An expert Delphi consensus for the characteristics of an ideal clozapine-specific side effect scale Psychotherapy training in psychiatry residencies: A review of trainees’ perspectives Exploring direct experience as a core element behind mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1