对Medvedev可解替代代数例子的修正

Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y
I. P. Shestakov
{"title":"对Medvedev可解替代代数例子的修正","authors":"I. P. Shestakov","doi":"10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><p>Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, <b>19</b>, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modification and Correction of Medvedev’s Example of a Solvable Alternative Algebra\",\"authors\":\"I. P. Shestakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><p>Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, <b>19</b>, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

余。A.Medvedev[代数与逻辑,19,No.3191-201(1980)]构造了一个替代代数的例子,他用这个例子证明了某些种类的替代代数在特征2的域上具有非Specht性质。尽管他的结果涉及特征2的情况,但这个例子被认为是任意域上的可替代例子,后来V.T.Filippov在一系列论文中使用了这个例子。不幸的是,梅德韦杰夫的例子在任何方面都不是可供选择的。因此,梅德韦杰夫考虑的品种是否具有非Specht性质尚不清楚。此外,以梅德韦杰夫为例的菲利波夫论文的结果也令人怀疑。我们构造了新的例子,并用它们来证明Filippov的结果是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Modification and Correction of Medvedev’s Example of a Solvable Alternative Algebra

Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, 19, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1