{"title":"对Medvedev可解替代代数例子的修正","authors":"I. P. Shestakov","doi":"10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><p>Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, <b>19</b>, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7422,"journal":{"name":"Algebra and Logic","volume":"61 5","pages":"420 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modification and Correction of Medvedev’s Example of a Solvable Alternative Algebra\",\"authors\":\"I. P. Shestakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><p>Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, <b>19</b>, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algebra and Logic\",\"volume\":\"61 5\",\"pages\":\"420 - 436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algebra and Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algebra and Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10469-023-09709-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modification and Correction of Medvedev’s Example of a Solvable Alternative Algebra
Yu. A. Medvedev [Algebra and Logic, 19, No. 3, 191—201 (1980)] constructed an example of alternative algebra that he used to prove that a certain variety of alternative algebras possess the non-Specht property over a field of characteristic 2. Though his result concerned the characteristic 2 case, the example was claimed to be alternative over an arbitrary field, and it was later used by V. T. Filippov in a series of papers. Unfortunately, Medvedev’s example is in fact not alternative in any characteristic. Therefore, whether the variety considered by Medvedev has the non-Specht property is still not clear. Moreover, the results of Filippov’s papers, in which Medvedev’s example was used, also become questionable. We construct new examples and employ them to prove that the results of Filippov remain true.
期刊介绍:
This bimonthly journal publishes results of the latest research in the areas of modern general algebra and of logic considered primarily from an algebraic viewpoint. The algebraic papers, constituting the major part of the contents, are concerned with studies in such fields as ordered, almost torsion-free, nilpotent, and metabelian groups; isomorphism rings; Lie algebras; Frattini subgroups; and clusters of algebras. In the area of logic, the periodical covers such topics as hierarchical sets, logical automata, and recursive functions.
Algebra and Logic is a translation of ALGEBRA I LOGIKA, a publication of the Siberian Fund for Algebra and Logic and the Institute of Mathematics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
All articles are peer-reviewed.