基于荧光光谱数据的机器学习韭菜种子分类

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY European Food Research and Technology Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3
Ewa Ropelewska, Kadir Sabanci, Vanya Slavova, Stefka Genova
{"title":"基于荧光光谱数据的机器学习韭菜种子分类","authors":"Ewa Ropelewska,&nbsp;Kadir Sabanci,&nbsp;Vanya Slavova,&nbsp;Stefka Genova","doi":"10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to distinguish leek seeds belonging to the <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> variety and two breeding lines based on the selected fluorescence spectroscopic data. The classification models were developed for three classes of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39 and pairs of classes of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 4, <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 39, and breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39. The traditional machine learning algorithms, such as PART, Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk, and Filtered Classifier were applied. All three classes were distinguished with an average accuracy of up to 93.33% for models built using IBk and Filtered Classifier. In the case of each model, <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> variety was completely different (accuracy of 100%, precision, and F-measure, MCC (Matthews correlation coefficient), and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) area of 1.000) from breeding lines, and the mixing of cases was observed between breeding line 4 and breeding line 39. The models built for pairs of leek seed classes distinguished <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> and breeding line 4 with an average accuracy reaching 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk). The classification accuracy of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> and breeding line 39 also reached 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk), whereas breeding line 4 and breeding line 39 were classified with an average accuracy of up to 80% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Filtered Classifier). The proposed approach combining fluorescence spectroscopy and machine learning may be used in practice to distinguish leek seed varieties and breeding lines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":549,"journal":{"name":"European Food Research and Technology","volume":"249 12","pages":"3217 - 3226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The classification of leek seeds based on fluorescence spectroscopic data using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Ropelewska,&nbsp;Kadir Sabanci,&nbsp;Vanya Slavova,&nbsp;Stefka Genova\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to distinguish leek seeds belonging to the <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> variety and two breeding lines based on the selected fluorescence spectroscopic data. The classification models were developed for three classes of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39 and pairs of classes of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 4, <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> vs. breeding line 39, and breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39. The traditional machine learning algorithms, such as PART, Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk, and Filtered Classifier were applied. All three classes were distinguished with an average accuracy of up to 93.33% for models built using IBk and Filtered Classifier. In the case of each model, <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> variety was completely different (accuracy of 100%, precision, and F-measure, MCC (Matthews correlation coefficient), and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) area of 1.000) from breeding lines, and the mixing of cases was observed between breeding line 4 and breeding line 39. The models built for pairs of leek seed classes distinguished <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> and breeding line 4 with an average accuracy reaching 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk). The classification accuracy of <i>Starozagorski kamush</i> and breeding line 39 also reached 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk), whereas breeding line 4 and breeding line 39 were classified with an average accuracy of up to 80% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Filtered Classifier). The proposed approach combining fluorescence spectroscopy and machine learning may be used in practice to distinguish leek seed varieties and breeding lines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"249 12\",\"pages\":\"3217 - 3226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Food Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-023-04361-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是基于所选的荧光光谱数据来区分属于Starozagorski kamush品种和两个育种系的韭菜种子。为三类Starozagorski kamush与品系4与品系39以及成对的Starozagourski kamush对品系4、Starozagororski kamush对品系39和品系4对品系9开发了分类模型。应用了传统的机器学习算法,如PART、Logistic、朴素贝叶斯、随机森林、IBk和过滤分类器。对于使用IBk和过滤分类器构建的模型,这三个类别都得到了区分,平均准确率高达93.33%。在每个模型的情况下,Starozagorski kamush品种与育种品系完全不同(准确度为100%,精密度和F-measure、MCC(Matthews相关系数)和ROC(受试者操作特征)面积为1.000),并且在育种品系4和育种品系39之间观察到病例混合。为成对的韭菜种子类别建立的模型区分了Starozagorski kamush和育种系4,平均准确率达到100%(Logistic、Naive Bayes、Random Forest、IBk)。Starozagorski kamush和品系39的分类准确率也达到了100%(Logistic、Naive Bayes、Random Forest、IBk),而品系4和品系三十九的分类平均准确率高达80%(Logistic,Naive Bayers、Random Forest、Filtered Classifier)。所提出的结合荧光光谱和机器学习的方法可以在实践中用于区分韭菜种子品种和育种系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The classification of leek seeds based on fluorescence spectroscopic data using machine learning

The objective of this study was to distinguish leek seeds belonging to the Starozagorski kamush variety and two breeding lines based on the selected fluorescence spectroscopic data. The classification models were developed for three classes of Starozagorski kamush vs. breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39 and pairs of classes of Starozagorski kamush vs. breeding line 4, Starozagorski kamush vs. breeding line 39, and breeding line 4 vs. breeding line 39. The traditional machine learning algorithms, such as PART, Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk, and Filtered Classifier were applied. All three classes were distinguished with an average accuracy of up to 93.33% for models built using IBk and Filtered Classifier. In the case of each model, Starozagorski kamush variety was completely different (accuracy of 100%, precision, and F-measure, MCC (Matthews correlation coefficient), and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) area of 1.000) from breeding lines, and the mixing of cases was observed between breeding line 4 and breeding line 39. The models built for pairs of leek seed classes distinguished Starozagorski kamush and breeding line 4 with an average accuracy reaching 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk). The classification accuracy of Starozagorski kamush and breeding line 39 also reached 100% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, IBk), whereas breeding line 4 and breeding line 39 were classified with an average accuracy of up to 80% (Logistic, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Filtered Classifier). The proposed approach combining fluorescence spectroscopy and machine learning may be used in practice to distinguish leek seed varieties and breeding lines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Food Research and Technology
European Food Research and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal European Food Research and Technology publishes state-of-the-art research papers and review articles on fundamental and applied food research. The journal''s mission is the fast publication of high quality papers on front-line research, newest techniques and on developing trends in the following sections: -chemistry and biochemistry- technology and molecular biotechnology- nutritional chemistry and toxicology- analytical and sensory methodologies- food physics. Out of the scope of the journal are: - contributions which are not of international interest or do not have a substantial impact on food sciences, - submissions which comprise merely data collections, based on the use of routine analytical or bacteriological methods, - contributions reporting biological or functional effects without profound chemical and/or physical structure characterization of the compound(s) under research.
期刊最新文献
Extraction of caffeoylquinic acids (CQAs) from sweet potato leaves and stems Exploring the influence of terroir on douro white and red wines characteristics: a study of human perception and electronic analysis Effect of seven baking lipases on the lipid class composition of three different cakes Application of sous-vide technology in the processing of different apple cultivars and its effect on physico-chemical properties The co-inoculation ratio of Hanseniaspora vineae-to-Saccharomyces cerevisiae correlates with aroma metabolic features in wine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1