剩余的二氧化碳预算:柴油和纯电动汽车动力传动系统技术的二氧化碳排放量比较

Christian Böhmeke, Thomas Koch
{"title":"剩余的二氧化碳预算:柴油和纯电动汽车动力传动系统技术的二氧化碳排放量比较","authors":"Christian Böhmeke,&nbsp;Thomas Koch","doi":"10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the additional electricity generation needed in Germany for battery electric vehicles. Different scenarios drawn up by the transmission system operators in past and for future years for expansion of the energy sources of electricity generation in Germany are considered. From these expansion scenarios, hourly resolved real-time simulations of the different years are created. Based on the calculations, it can be shown that even in 2035, the carbon footprint of a battery electric vehicle at a consumption of 22.5 kWh/100 km including losses and provision will be around 100 g CO<sub>2</sub>/km. Furthermore, it is shown why the often-mentioned German energy mix is not suitable for calculating the emissions of a battery electric vehicle fleet. Since the carbon footprint of a BEV improves significantly over the years due to the progressive expansion of renewable-energy sources, a comparison is drawn at the end of this work between a BEV (29.8 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>), a conventional diesel vehicle (34.4 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>), and a diesel vehicle with R33 fuel (25.8 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>) over the entire useful life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"6 3-4","pages":"127 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The remaining CO2 budget: a comparison of the CO2 emissions of diesel and BEV drivetrain technology\",\"authors\":\"Christian Böhmeke,&nbsp;Thomas Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the additional electricity generation needed in Germany for battery electric vehicles. Different scenarios drawn up by the transmission system operators in past and for future years for expansion of the energy sources of electricity generation in Germany are considered. From these expansion scenarios, hourly resolved real-time simulations of the different years are created. Based on the calculations, it can be shown that even in 2035, the carbon footprint of a battery electric vehicle at a consumption of 22.5 kWh/100 km including losses and provision will be around 100 g CO<sub>2</sub>/km. Furthermore, it is shown why the often-mentioned German energy mix is not suitable for calculating the emissions of a battery electric vehicle fleet. Since the carbon footprint of a BEV improves significantly over the years due to the progressive expansion of renewable-energy sources, a comparison is drawn at the end of this work between a BEV (29.8 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>), a conventional diesel vehicle (34.4 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>), and a diesel vehicle with R33 fuel (25.8 tons of CO<sub>2</sub>) over the entire useful life.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"volume\":\"6 3-4\",\"pages\":\"127 - 145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-021-00081-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了德国电池电动汽车所需额外发电的二氧化碳排放量。考虑了输电系统运营商在过去和未来几年为扩大德国发电能源而制定的不同方案。根据这些扩展场景,创建了不同年份的逐小时解析实时模拟。根据计算,可以表明,即使在2035年,电池电动汽车在22.5千瓦时/100公里的消耗(包括损失和供应)下的碳足迹也将在100克二氧化碳/公里左右。此外,还表明了为什么经常提到的德国能源组合不适合计算电池电动车队的排放量。由于可再生能源的逐步扩展,纯电动汽车的碳足迹在多年内显著改善,因此在本工作结束时,对纯电动汽车(29.8吨二氧化碳)、传统柴油车(34.4吨二氧化碳)和使用R33燃料的柴油车(25.8吨二氧化碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The remaining CO2 budget: a comparison of the CO2 emissions of diesel and BEV drivetrain technology

This paper describes the CO2 emissions of the additional electricity generation needed in Germany for battery electric vehicles. Different scenarios drawn up by the transmission system operators in past and for future years for expansion of the energy sources of electricity generation in Germany are considered. From these expansion scenarios, hourly resolved real-time simulations of the different years are created. Based on the calculations, it can be shown that even in 2035, the carbon footprint of a battery electric vehicle at a consumption of 22.5 kWh/100 km including losses and provision will be around 100 g CO2/km. Furthermore, it is shown why the often-mentioned German energy mix is not suitable for calculating the emissions of a battery electric vehicle fleet. Since the carbon footprint of a BEV improves significantly over the years due to the progressive expansion of renewable-energy sources, a comparison is drawn at the end of this work between a BEV (29.8 tons of CO2), a conventional diesel vehicle (34.4 tons of CO2), and a diesel vehicle with R33 fuel (25.8 tons of CO2) over the entire useful life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an electrochemically approximated simulation model and a hardware substitution cell approach for thermal management battery system tests A detailed comparison of ethanol–diesel direct fuel blending to conventional ethanol–diesel dual-fuel combustion Influence of the air–fuel-ratio and fuel on the reactivity of diesel soot Introducing the double validation metric for radar sensor models Chassis concept of the individually steerable five-link suspension: a novel approach to maximize the road wheel angle to improve vehicle agility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1