{"title":"存在和不存在Al2O3界面层时YSZ和MSZ热障涂层的显微组织和粘附强度的比较","authors":"Arash Mesbahzade, Seyed Hosein Razavi, Zahrasadat Seyedraoufi, Yazdan Shajari, Mohsen Samiee","doi":"10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, the APS process was used to coat Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, YSZ, and MSZ were applied on the surface of the IN738LC superalloy and NiCrAlY as the middle layer. The microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength of these coatings were compared with the coating having the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as the interlayer. Results showed that MSZ coating had less porosity compared to YSZ. Also, the presence of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as an interface layer in the YSZ sample increased the porosity while in the MSZ sample the porosity decreased. With the presence of the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer, the size of the pores increased to the point that the largest porosity diameter in the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample was about 75 μm. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed highest adhesion strength (31 MPa) because of lower porosity. The high adhesion strength of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> can be attributed to diffusion and the formation of possible splats. The results showed that the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample had higher strength than Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ with about 28 MPa. MgO seems to be a better and cheaper stabilizing additive than Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"59 3","pages":"597 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of microstructure and adhesion strength of YSZ and MSZ thermal barrier coatings in the presence and absence of Al2O3 interface layer\",\"authors\":\"Arash Mesbahzade, Seyed Hosein Razavi, Zahrasadat Seyedraoufi, Yazdan Shajari, Mohsen Samiee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the present study, the APS process was used to coat Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, YSZ, and MSZ were applied on the surface of the IN738LC superalloy and NiCrAlY as the middle layer. The microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength of these coatings were compared with the coating having the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as the interlayer. Results showed that MSZ coating had less porosity compared to YSZ. Also, the presence of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as an interface layer in the YSZ sample increased the porosity while in the MSZ sample the porosity decreased. With the presence of the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer, the size of the pores increased to the point that the largest porosity diameter in the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample was about 75 μm. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed highest adhesion strength (31 MPa) because of lower porosity. The high adhesion strength of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> can be attributed to diffusion and the formation of possible splats. The results showed that the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample had higher strength than Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ with about 28 MPa. MgO seems to be a better and cheaper stabilizing additive than Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"597 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of microstructure and adhesion strength of YSZ and MSZ thermal barrier coatings in the presence and absence of Al2O3 interface layer
In the present study, the APS process was used to coat Al2O3, YSZ, and MSZ were applied on the surface of the IN738LC superalloy and NiCrAlY as the middle layer. The microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength of these coatings were compared with the coating having the Al2O3 as the interlayer. Results showed that MSZ coating had less porosity compared to YSZ. Also, the presence of Al2O3 as an interface layer in the YSZ sample increased the porosity while in the MSZ sample the porosity decreased. With the presence of the Al2O3 layer, the size of the pores increased to the point that the largest porosity diameter in the Al2O3-MSZ sample was about 75 μm. Al2O3 showed highest adhesion strength (31 MPa) because of lower porosity. The high adhesion strength of Al2O3 can be attributed to diffusion and the formation of possible splats. The results showed that the Al2O3-MSZ sample had higher strength than Al2O3-MSZ with about 28 MPa. MgO seems to be a better and cheaper stabilizing additive than Y2O3.
期刊介绍:
Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials
Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics
Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965
Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted