Josef Markus Ratzinger, Simon Buchberger, Helmut Eichlseder
{"title":"轮式非道路移动机械的电气化动力系统","authors":"Josef Markus Ratzinger, Simon Buchberger, Helmut Eichlseder","doi":"10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Already enacted carbon-dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) limiting legislations for passenger cars and heavy duty vehicles, drive motivations to consider electrification also in the sector of non-road mobile machinery. Up to now, only the emissions of the vehicles themselves have been restricted. However, to capture the overall situation, a more global assessment approach is necessary. The study described in this article applies a tank-to-wheel and an extended well-to-wheel approach based on simulations to compare three different powertrains: a battery electric drive, a parallel electric hybrid drive, and a series electric hybrid drive. The results show that electrification is not per se the better solution in terms of keeping CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at a minimum, as battery electric powertrains are accountable for the lowest as well as the highest possible CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of all powertrains compared. A battery electric machine is not economically competitive if its battery has to last a whole working day. Parallel hybrid systems do not achieve much of an advantage in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. In this global assessment approach, the most promising propulsion system for wheel-driven-mobile-machinery appears to be the series hybrid system, which shows to offer up to 20% of CO<sub>2</sub> saving potential compared to the current machine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrified powertrains for wheel-driven non-road mobile machinery\",\"authors\":\"Josef Markus Ratzinger, Simon Buchberger, Helmut Eichlseder\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Already enacted carbon-dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) limiting legislations for passenger cars and heavy duty vehicles, drive motivations to consider electrification also in the sector of non-road mobile machinery. Up to now, only the emissions of the vehicles themselves have been restricted. However, to capture the overall situation, a more global assessment approach is necessary. The study described in this article applies a tank-to-wheel and an extended well-to-wheel approach based on simulations to compare three different powertrains: a battery electric drive, a parallel electric hybrid drive, and a series electric hybrid drive. The results show that electrification is not per se the better solution in terms of keeping CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at a minimum, as battery electric powertrains are accountable for the lowest as well as the highest possible CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of all powertrains compared. A battery electric machine is not economically competitive if its battery has to last a whole working day. Parallel hybrid systems do not achieve much of an advantage in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. In this global assessment approach, the most promising propulsion system for wheel-driven-mobile-machinery appears to be the series hybrid system, which shows to offer up to 20% of CO<sub>2</sub> saving potential compared to the current machine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"volume\":\"6 1-2\",\"pages\":\"1 - 13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-020-00072-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrified powertrains for wheel-driven non-road mobile machinery
Already enacted carbon-dioxide (CO2) limiting legislations for passenger cars and heavy duty vehicles, drive motivations to consider electrification also in the sector of non-road mobile machinery. Up to now, only the emissions of the vehicles themselves have been restricted. However, to capture the overall situation, a more global assessment approach is necessary. The study described in this article applies a tank-to-wheel and an extended well-to-wheel approach based on simulations to compare three different powertrains: a battery electric drive, a parallel electric hybrid drive, and a series electric hybrid drive. The results show that electrification is not per se the better solution in terms of keeping CO2 emissions at a minimum, as battery electric powertrains are accountable for the lowest as well as the highest possible CO2 emissions of all powertrains compared. A battery electric machine is not economically competitive if its battery has to last a whole working day. Parallel hybrid systems do not achieve much of an advantage in terms of CO2 emissions. In this global assessment approach, the most promising propulsion system for wheel-driven-mobile-machinery appears to be the series hybrid system, which shows to offer up to 20% of CO2 saving potential compared to the current machine.