实验单缸光学发动机进气过程中翻滚形成的PIV和LES联合实验研究

Alexandros Katsinos, Vasileios D. Tsiogkas, Dimitrios Kolokotronis, Antonios Tourlidakis, Ananias Tomboulides
{"title":"实验单缸光学发动机进气过程中翻滚形成的PIV和LES联合实验研究","authors":"Alexandros Katsinos,&nbsp;Vasileios D. Tsiogkas,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kolokotronis,&nbsp;Antonios Tourlidakis,&nbsp;Ananias Tomboulides","doi":"10.1007/s41104-021-00096-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The focus of this paper is on the verification and validation of computational approaches commonly used for the simulation of in-cylinder processes involving intense turbulent flow and combustion. Furthermore, the tumble behavior during the intake stroke at different engine operating points is investigated since the cycle-to-cycle variability of the subsequent tumble breakdown at the end of compression stroke is reported to negatively affect the engine efficiency. In this respect, measurements with advanced laser diagnostics-based experimental techniques (TR-PIV) in an optically accessible engine have been performed and compared with LES for flow in the same engine, under identical operating conditions. The study focused on the intake stroke under wide open throttle conditions and engine speed of 1000 RPM and 1500 RPM. The ensemble averaged velocity fields of the two methods were analyzed and compared. A counter-clockwise motion and some secondary recirculation zones were identified and quantified in both methods. The same trend for tumble ratio was observed between experiments and simulations and a good agreement was found for most CAD especially at 1500 RPM. At 1000 RPM comparison showed significant variations, which after a detailed analysis of the instantaneous fields, are attributed to the strong cycle-to-cycle variability of the instantaneous tumble center. It is observed, that for relevance index values below 0.75 the ensemble averaged flow fields that the two methods predict significantly differ.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"7 1-2","pages":"37 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A combined experimental (PIV) and numerical (LES) study of the tumble formation during the intake stroke of an experimental single-cylinder optical engine\",\"authors\":\"Alexandros Katsinos,&nbsp;Vasileios D. Tsiogkas,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kolokotronis,&nbsp;Antonios Tourlidakis,&nbsp;Ananias Tomboulides\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41104-021-00096-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The focus of this paper is on the verification and validation of computational approaches commonly used for the simulation of in-cylinder processes involving intense turbulent flow and combustion. Furthermore, the tumble behavior during the intake stroke at different engine operating points is investigated since the cycle-to-cycle variability of the subsequent tumble breakdown at the end of compression stroke is reported to negatively affect the engine efficiency. In this respect, measurements with advanced laser diagnostics-based experimental techniques (TR-PIV) in an optically accessible engine have been performed and compared with LES for flow in the same engine, under identical operating conditions. The study focused on the intake stroke under wide open throttle conditions and engine speed of 1000 RPM and 1500 RPM. The ensemble averaged velocity fields of the two methods were analyzed and compared. A counter-clockwise motion and some secondary recirculation zones were identified and quantified in both methods. The same trend for tumble ratio was observed between experiments and simulations and a good agreement was found for most CAD especially at 1500 RPM. At 1000 RPM comparison showed significant variations, which after a detailed analysis of the instantaneous fields, are attributed to the strong cycle-to-cycle variability of the instantaneous tumble center. It is observed, that for relevance index values below 0.75 the ensemble averaged flow fields that the two methods predict significantly differ.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"volume\":\"7 1-2\",\"pages\":\"37 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-021-00096-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-021-00096-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是验证和验证通常用于模拟涉及强烈湍流和燃烧的缸内过程的计算方法。此外,研究了在不同发动机工作点的进气冲程期间的翻滚行为,因为据报道,在压缩冲程结束时随后的翻滚故障的循环到循环的可变性会对发动机效率产生负面影响。在这方面,已经在光学可接近的发动机中使用先进的基于激光诊断的实验技术(TR-PIV)进行了测量,并与相同发动机中在相同操作条件下的流量的LES进行了比较。研究的重点是在节气门全开、发动机转速为1000转/分和1500转/分的情况下的进气冲程。对两种方法的系综平均速度场进行了分析和比较。在这两种方法中都识别并量化了逆时针运动和一些二次再循环区。在实验和模拟之间观察到翻滚比的相同趋势,并且对于大多数CAD,尤其是在1500RPM时,发现了良好的一致性。在1000转/分的情况下,比较显示了显著的变化,在对瞬时场进行详细分析后,这些变化归因于瞬时翻滚中心的强循环间变化。可以观察到,对于低于0.75的相关性指数值,两种方法预测的整体平均流场显著不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A combined experimental (PIV) and numerical (LES) study of the tumble formation during the intake stroke of an experimental single-cylinder optical engine

The focus of this paper is on the verification and validation of computational approaches commonly used for the simulation of in-cylinder processes involving intense turbulent flow and combustion. Furthermore, the tumble behavior during the intake stroke at different engine operating points is investigated since the cycle-to-cycle variability of the subsequent tumble breakdown at the end of compression stroke is reported to negatively affect the engine efficiency. In this respect, measurements with advanced laser diagnostics-based experimental techniques (TR-PIV) in an optically accessible engine have been performed and compared with LES for flow in the same engine, under identical operating conditions. The study focused on the intake stroke under wide open throttle conditions and engine speed of 1000 RPM and 1500 RPM. The ensemble averaged velocity fields of the two methods were analyzed and compared. A counter-clockwise motion and some secondary recirculation zones were identified and quantified in both methods. The same trend for tumble ratio was observed between experiments and simulations and a good agreement was found for most CAD especially at 1500 RPM. At 1000 RPM comparison showed significant variations, which after a detailed analysis of the instantaneous fields, are attributed to the strong cycle-to-cycle variability of the instantaneous tumble center. It is observed, that for relevance index values below 0.75 the ensemble averaged flow fields that the two methods predict significantly differ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an electrochemically approximated simulation model and a hardware substitution cell approach for thermal management battery system tests A detailed comparison of ethanol–diesel direct fuel blending to conventional ethanol–diesel dual-fuel combustion Influence of the air–fuel-ratio and fuel on the reactivity of diesel soot Introducing the double validation metric for radar sensor models Chassis concept of the individually steerable five-link suspension: a novel approach to maximize the road wheel angle to improve vehicle agility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1