食品安全认证标准选择方法

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Security Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8
Joice Aline Aguiar Cruz Zanatta, Reginaldo Fidelis, Lyssa Setsuko Sakanaka
{"title":"食品安全认证标准选择方法","authors":"Joice Aline Aguiar Cruz Zanatta,&nbsp;Reginaldo Fidelis,&nbsp;Lyssa Setsuko Sakanaka","doi":"10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food safety is a global public health issue and also a crucial aspect of food security. For a food manufacturing company, food safety plays an important role in maintaining its reputation, so entrepreneurs adopt certification standard systems to safeguard consumers. However, choosing a certification standard can become a complex and conflicting process for companies’ decision-makers. This study proposes a multi-attribute analysis based on the multicriteria fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for the selection of a certification standard for food safety. Firstly, a set of certification standards in the field of food safety was selected based on a literature review and interviews with scholars and company managers. Secondly, a quantitative-qualitative interview with decision makers of a food company was performed using the AHP method. By using the AHP method, decision makers were able to compare, in a structured way, each set of criteria and assign weights for each one, according to their perception of importance. Results indicated that the hierarchical ordering of the alternatives for the decision-makers presented similar opinions regarding the weight of each criterion. Moreover, decision makers considered the cost of certification to be the most important criteria for choosing a certification standard. This paper makes unique contributions by presenting a systematic approach for managers of an industry to successfully solve complex multiple-criteria problems, such as the choice of a certification standard for food safety, with less time-consuming efforts.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"15 4","pages":"1071 - 1085"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method for selecting certification standards for food safety\",\"authors\":\"Joice Aline Aguiar Cruz Zanatta,&nbsp;Reginaldo Fidelis,&nbsp;Lyssa Setsuko Sakanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Food safety is a global public health issue and also a crucial aspect of food security. For a food manufacturing company, food safety plays an important role in maintaining its reputation, so entrepreneurs adopt certification standard systems to safeguard consumers. However, choosing a certification standard can become a complex and conflicting process for companies’ decision-makers. This study proposes a multi-attribute analysis based on the multicriteria fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for the selection of a certification standard for food safety. Firstly, a set of certification standards in the field of food safety was selected based on a literature review and interviews with scholars and company managers. Secondly, a quantitative-qualitative interview with decision makers of a food company was performed using the AHP method. By using the AHP method, decision makers were able to compare, in a structured way, each set of criteria and assign weights for each one, according to their perception of importance. Results indicated that the hierarchical ordering of the alternatives for the decision-makers presented similar opinions regarding the weight of each criterion. Moreover, decision makers considered the cost of certification to be the most important criteria for choosing a certification standard. This paper makes unique contributions by presenting a systematic approach for managers of an industry to successfully solve complex multiple-criteria problems, such as the choice of a certification standard for food safety, with less time-consuming efforts.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Security\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"1071 - 1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品安全是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,也是粮食安全的一个重要方面。对于一家食品制造企业来说,食品安全对其声誉的维护起着重要的作用,因此企业家采用认证标准体系来保护消费者。然而,对于公司的决策者来说,选择认证标准可能会成为一个复杂且相互冲突的过程。本研究提出一种基于多准则模糊层次分析法(FAHP)的多属性分析方法,用于食品安全认证标准的选择。首先,通过文献综述和对学者和企业管理者的访谈,选择了一套食品安全领域的认证标准。其次,运用层次分析法对某食品公司的决策者进行了定量-定性访谈。通过使用AHP方法,决策者能够以一种结构化的方式比较每一套标准,并根据他们对重要性的看法为每一套标准分配权重。结果表明,决策者的层次排序对每个标准的权重提出了类似的意见。此外,决策者认为认证成本是选择认证标准的最重要标准。本文通过为行业管理者提供一种系统的方法来成功解决复杂的多标准问题,例如选择食品安全认证标准,从而做出了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Method for selecting certification standards for food safety

Food safety is a global public health issue and also a crucial aspect of food security. For a food manufacturing company, food safety plays an important role in maintaining its reputation, so entrepreneurs adopt certification standard systems to safeguard consumers. However, choosing a certification standard can become a complex and conflicting process for companies’ decision-makers. This study proposes a multi-attribute analysis based on the multicriteria fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for the selection of a certification standard for food safety. Firstly, a set of certification standards in the field of food safety was selected based on a literature review and interviews with scholars and company managers. Secondly, a quantitative-qualitative interview with decision makers of a food company was performed using the AHP method. By using the AHP method, decision makers were able to compare, in a structured way, each set of criteria and assign weights for each one, according to their perception of importance. Results indicated that the hierarchical ordering of the alternatives for the decision-makers presented similar opinions regarding the weight of each criterion. Moreover, decision makers considered the cost of certification to be the most important criteria for choosing a certification standard. This paper makes unique contributions by presenting a systematic approach for managers of an industry to successfully solve complex multiple-criteria problems, such as the choice of a certification standard for food safety, with less time-consuming efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
期刊最新文献
The rice disease of the poor farmer returns a study in the Philippines shows the way Triple duty actions to address the global syndemic of undernutrition, obesity and environmental sustainability: a scoping review City governance, urban livelihoods, and food security: insights from street food trade in Kumasi, Ghana Potential response of Mexican consumers to a Ban on genetically modified Maize imports Too poor to choose? Analyzing food agency in food insecure households in rural Burundi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1