家庭透析:荷兰人的视角

Elisabeth W. Boeschoten MD, PhD, Wieneke M. Michels MD, PhD
{"title":"家庭透析:荷兰人的视角","authors":"Elisabeth W. Boeschoten MD, PhD,&nbsp;Wieneke M. Michels MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For patients with end-stage renal disease who are not (yet) eligible for renal transplantation, treatment with dialy-sis is mandatory for survival. Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) offer patients more flexibility compared with in-center treatment and have been advocated as the first choice in clinically stable patients. However, despite encouraging developments in dialysis systems that make the procedure easier, in many countries the proportion of patients using home dialysis, especially peritoneal dialysis, is decreasing. In Europe this decrease is most pronounced in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. This evolution cannot be motivated by an inferiority of home dialysis modalities compared with in-center treatment, as all these modalities have been shown to generate similar results. Other, often non-medical, factors (such as reimbursement, social and logistic issues, and the experience of physicians and nurses with home dialysis) seem to be responsible for this development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 4","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20562","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home dialysis: A Dutch perspective\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth W. Boeschoten MD, PhD,&nbsp;Wieneke M. Michels MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dat.20562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For patients with end-stage renal disease who are not (yet) eligible for renal transplantation, treatment with dialy-sis is mandatory for survival. Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) offer patients more flexibility compared with in-center treatment and have been advocated as the first choice in clinically stable patients. However, despite encouraging developments in dialysis systems that make the procedure easier, in many countries the proportion of patients using home dialysis, especially peritoneal dialysis, is decreasing. In Europe this decrease is most pronounced in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. This evolution cannot be motivated by an inferiority of home dialysis modalities compared with in-center treatment, as all these modalities have been shown to generate similar results. Other, often non-medical, factors (such as reimbursement, social and logistic issues, and the experience of physicians and nurses with home dialysis) seem to be responsible for this development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialysis & Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"159-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20562\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialysis & Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dat.20562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialysis & Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dat.20562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于尚未符合肾移植条件的终末期肾病患者,透析治疗是生存的必要条件。与中心治疗相比,家庭透析方式(家庭血液透析或腹膜透析)为患者提供了更大的灵活性,已被提倡作为临床稳定患者的首选。然而,尽管透析系统取得了令人鼓舞的进展,使手术变得更容易,但在许多国家,使用家庭透析,特别是腹膜透析的患者比例正在下降。在欧洲,这种下降在荷兰和英国最为明显。与中心治疗相比,这种演变不能被家庭透析方式的劣势所激发,因为所有这些方式都显示出相似的结果。其他通常是非医疗因素(如报销、社会和后勤问题以及医生和护士的家庭透析经验)似乎是造成这种发展的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Home dialysis: A Dutch perspective

For patients with end-stage renal disease who are not (yet) eligible for renal transplantation, treatment with dialy-sis is mandatory for survival. Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) offer patients more flexibility compared with in-center treatment and have been advocated as the first choice in clinically stable patients. However, despite encouraging developments in dialysis systems that make the procedure easier, in many countries the proportion of patients using home dialysis, especially peritoneal dialysis, is decreasing. In Europe this decrease is most pronounced in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. This evolution cannot be motivated by an inferiority of home dialysis modalities compared with in-center treatment, as all these modalities have been shown to generate similar results. Other, often non-medical, factors (such as reimbursement, social and logistic issues, and the experience of physicians and nurses with home dialysis) seem to be responsible for this development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialysis & Transplantation
Dialysis & Transplantation 医学-工程:生物医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Extensive vascular calcification in diabetic uremic patient A product of medical advancements Dialysis care: Three decades later Persistent hypophosphathemia recovered with cinacalcet in a late renal transplanted patient How the latest evidence from clinical research informs patient care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1