测量中间层风的反褶积技术与间隔天线技术的比较

D.M Lingard
{"title":"测量中间层风的反褶积技术与间隔天线技术的比较","authors":"D.M Lingard","doi":"10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two techniques of mesospheric wind velocity measurement are compared. One is the spaced antenna technique and the other is a technique described in this paper which deconvolves radar data in order to determine the positions and Doppler shifts of D-region scatterers. Both techniques were employed in the height interval 70–96 km using the Bribie Island radar (152°E, 27°S) operating at 1.98 MHz. A median discrepancy of 15 m/s between the two sets of wind measurements was observed. This was reduced to about 7 m/s when both techniques were forced to use the same echo information when performing a wind velocity measurement. In performing a measurement, the deconvolution technique has the advantage of being able to use the echo information within a height interval whereas the spaced antenna technique uses echo information within a range interval. However the deconvolution technique has disadvantages including much greater computer time requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics","volume":"58 11","pages":"Pages 1211-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a deconvolution technique for measuring mesospheric winds with the spaced antenna technique\",\"authors\":\"D.M Lingard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two techniques of mesospheric wind velocity measurement are compared. One is the spaced antenna technique and the other is a technique described in this paper which deconvolves radar data in order to determine the positions and Doppler shifts of D-region scatterers. Both techniques were employed in the height interval 70–96 km using the Bribie Island radar (152°E, 27°S) operating at 1.98 MHz. A median discrepancy of 15 m/s between the two sets of wind measurements was observed. This was reduced to about 7 m/s when both techniques were forced to use the same echo information when performing a wind velocity measurement. In performing a measurement, the deconvolution technique has the advantage of being able to use the echo information within a height interval whereas the spaced antenna technique uses echo information within a range interval. However the deconvolution technique has disadvantages including much greater computer time requirements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics\",\"volume\":\"58 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1211-1218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9169(95)00151-4\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021916995001514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021916995001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

比较了两种测量中间层风速的方法。一种是间隔天线技术,另一种是本文描述的对雷达数据进行反卷积以确定d区散射体的位置和多普勒频移的技术。这两种技术都在70-96 km高度区间使用Bribie岛雷达(152°E, 27°S),工作频率为1.98 MHz。观察到两组风测量值之间的中位数差异为15 m/s。当两种技术在进行风速测量时被迫使用相同的回波信息时,这一速度降至约7米/秒。在进行测量时,反褶积技术的优点是能够使用高度间隔内的回波信息,而间隔天线技术使用距离间隔内的回波信息。然而,反褶积技术有缺点,包括更大的计算机时间要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of a deconvolution technique for measuring mesospheric winds with the spaced antenna technique

Two techniques of mesospheric wind velocity measurement are compared. One is the spaced antenna technique and the other is a technique described in this paper which deconvolves radar data in order to determine the positions and Doppler shifts of D-region scatterers. Both techniques were employed in the height interval 70–96 km using the Bribie Island radar (152°E, 27°S) operating at 1.98 MHz. A median discrepancy of 15 m/s between the two sets of wind measurements was observed. This was reduced to about 7 m/s when both techniques were forced to use the same echo information when performing a wind velocity measurement. In performing a measurement, the deconvolution technique has the advantage of being able to use the echo information within a height interval whereas the spaced antenna technique uses echo information within a range interval. However the deconvolution technique has disadvantages including much greater computer time requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rocket measurements of the equatorial airglow: MULTIFOT 92 database European meeting on atmospheric studies by optical methods University College of London, 12–16 September 1994 ALOMAR: atmospheric science using lidars, radars and ground based instruments The doppler wind and temperature system of the ALOMAR lidar facility: overview and initial results Modelling of the twilight sky brightness using a numerical solution of the radiation transfer equation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1