基于可靠性的防护结构设计方法

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Safety Pub Date : 1994-08-01 DOI:10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7
L.A. Twisdale, R.H. Sues, F.M. Lavelle
{"title":"基于可靠性的防护结构设计方法","authors":"L.A. Twisdale,&nbsp;R.H. Sues,&nbsp;F.M. Lavelle","doi":"10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper summarizes the results of research to develop reliability-based design methods for use with the United States Air Force <em>Protective Construction Design Manual</em> (PCDM). The application of these methods is based on easy-to-use, reliability-based design factors (RBDFs). The research focused on five fundamental areas: (1) airblast and aboveground structure response; (2) groundshock and below-ground structure response; (3) fragmentation effects; (4) projectile penetration; and (5) protective structure systems reliability. The scope of the structural response research was limited to reinforced concrete structures; however, the load uncertainty analyses are generally applicable to protective structures of any material. The research also uncovered several areas of significant bias in the analysis methods, which could not be corrected without changes to the fundamental approach in the PCDM. RBDFs were not developed for these cases; however, either specific ways to improve the model prediction accuracy were recommended or improved models were provided and demonstrated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability-based design methods for protective structures\",\"authors\":\"L.A. Twisdale,&nbsp;R.H. Sues,&nbsp;F.M. Lavelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper summarizes the results of research to develop reliability-based design methods for use with the United States Air Force <em>Protective Construction Design Manual</em> (PCDM). The application of these methods is based on easy-to-use, reliability-based design factors (RBDFs). The research focused on five fundamental areas: (1) airblast and aboveground structure response; (2) groundshock and below-ground structure response; (3) fragmentation effects; (4) projectile penetration; and (5) protective structure systems reliability. The scope of the structural response research was limited to reinforced concrete structures; however, the load uncertainty analyses are generally applicable to protective structures of any material. The research also uncovered several areas of significant bias in the analysis methods, which could not be corrected without changes to the fundamental approach in the PCDM. RBDFs were not developed for these cases; however, either specific ways to improve the model prediction accuracy were recommended or improved models were provided and demonstrated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90050-7\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167473094900507\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167473094900507","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

本文总结了与美国空军防护结构设计手册(PCDM)一起开发基于可靠性的设计方法的研究结果。这些方法的应用基于易于使用、基于可靠性的设计因子(rbdf)。研究主要集中在五个基本领域:(1)风与地上结构响应;(2)地震动与地下结构响应;(3)破碎效应;(4)弹侵彻;(5)防护结构体系的可靠性。结构响应研究的范围仅限于钢筋混凝土结构;然而,载荷不确定性分析一般适用于任何材料的防护结构。该研究还发现了分析方法中存在几个显著偏差的领域,如果不改变PCDM的基本方法,这些偏差就无法纠正。没有针对这些病例开发rbdf;然而,无论是推荐提高模型预测精度的具体方法,还是提供并演示改进的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability-based design methods for protective structures

This paper summarizes the results of research to develop reliability-based design methods for use with the United States Air Force Protective Construction Design Manual (PCDM). The application of these methods is based on easy-to-use, reliability-based design factors (RBDFs). The research focused on five fundamental areas: (1) airblast and aboveground structure response; (2) groundshock and below-ground structure response; (3) fragmentation effects; (4) projectile penetration; and (5) protective structure systems reliability. The scope of the structural response research was limited to reinforced concrete structures; however, the load uncertainty analyses are generally applicable to protective structures of any material. The research also uncovered several areas of significant bias in the analysis methods, which could not be corrected without changes to the fundamental approach in the PCDM. RBDFs were not developed for these cases; however, either specific ways to improve the model prediction accuracy were recommended or improved models were provided and demonstrated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
期刊最新文献
Yet another Bayesian active learning reliability analysis method Improved Bayesian model updating of geomaterial parameters for slope reliability assessment considering spatial variability Editorial Board Data-enhanced design charts for efficient reliability-based design of geotechnical systems System reliability analysis of building clusters considering inter-structural seismic demand correlation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1