混日子:对耶茨和戈尔茨坦的回应

Lee Roy Beach
{"title":"混日子:对耶茨和戈尔茨坦的回应","authors":"Lee Roy Beach","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (<em>Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,</em> <strong>31</strong>, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muddling through: A response to Yates and Goldstein\",\"authors\":\"Lee Roy Beach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (<em>Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,</em> <strong>31</strong>, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

为了回应Yates和Goldstein的评论(组织行为和人类绩效,31,26),Beach, Townes和Campbell在生育计划决策方面的研究的发展历史被重新叙述。本文认为,在开发一种人们能够并且愿意使用的决策辅助工具的过程中,偏离正式的决策理论考虑是必要的,最终结果并非不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Muddling through: A response to Yates and Goldstein

In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Career transitions within organizations: An exploratory study of work, nonwork, and coping strategies Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword A within-person test of the form of the expectancy theory model in a choice context A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions Perceived competence as a moderator of the relationship between role clarity and job performance: A test of two hypotheses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1