{"title":"混日子:对耶茨和戈尔茨坦的回应","authors":"Lee Roy Beach","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (<em>Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,</em> <strong>31</strong>, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muddling through: A response to Yates and Goldstein\",\"authors\":\"Lee Roy Beach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (<em>Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,</em> <strong>31</strong>, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90112-5\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Muddling through: A response to Yates and Goldstein
In response to comments by Yates and Goldstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,31, 26), the developmental history of the Beach, Townes, and Campbell work on birth-planning decisions is recounted. It is argued that in the course of developing a decision aid that people could and would use, deviations from formal decision theoretic considerations were necessary and that the final result is not unreasonable.