市场对证券交易所上市缺陷通知的反应:来自纳斯达克的证据

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Advances in Accounting Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100616
Binod Guragai
{"title":"市场对证券交易所上市缺陷通知的反应:来自纳斯达克的证据","authors":"Binod Guragai","doi":"10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires Form 8-K filings of quantitative deficiency notices. This study examines whether investors use these 8-K filings in a way that influences their investment decisions. Using abnormal returns, I show that investors react negatively to these 8-K filings. Reactions to filings are less negative for firms with more institutional investors. I also find that firms with more analyst following experience less negative market reaction, supporting the notion that 8-K filings are more informative when the firm's information environment is poor. I further document that equity and multiple deficiency notice filings elicit more negative reactions and are also more likely to result in actual delisting compared to bid price deficiency notice filings. Together, these results help us understand investors' perceptions and delisting risks associated with quantitative deficiency notice filings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46906,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market response to stock exchange listing deficiency notices: Evidence from Nasdaq\",\"authors\":\"Binod Guragai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires Form 8-K filings of quantitative deficiency notices. This study examines whether investors use these 8-K filings in a way that influences their investment decisions. Using abnormal returns, I show that investors react negatively to these 8-K filings. Reactions to filings are less negative for firms with more institutional investors. I also find that firms with more analyst following experience less negative market reaction, supporting the notion that 8-K filings are more informative when the firm's information environment is poor. I further document that equity and multiple deficiency notice filings elicit more negative reactions and are also more likely to result in actual delisting compared to bid price deficiency notice filings. Together, these results help us understand investors' perceptions and delisting risks associated with quantitative deficiency notice filings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611022000359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611022000359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国证券交易委员会(SEC)要求提交8-K表格的定量缺陷通知。本研究考察了投资者是否以影响其投资决策的方式使用这些8-K文件。使用异常回报,我表明投资者对这些8-K文件的反应是负面的。对于拥有更多机构投资者的公司来说,对备案的反应不那么负面。我还发现,拥有更多分析师跟踪的公司经历的负面市场反应较少,这支持了当公司信息环境较差时8-K文件更具信息性的观点。我进一步证明,与出价不足通知文件相比,股权和多重缺陷通知文件引发了更多的负面反应,也更有可能导致实际退市。总之,这些结果有助于我们了解投资者的看法和退市风险与定量缺陷通知文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market response to stock exchange listing deficiency notices: Evidence from Nasdaq

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires Form 8-K filings of quantitative deficiency notices. This study examines whether investors use these 8-K filings in a way that influences their investment decisions. Using abnormal returns, I show that investors react negatively to these 8-K filings. Reactions to filings are less negative for firms with more institutional investors. I also find that firms with more analyst following experience less negative market reaction, supporting the notion that 8-K filings are more informative when the firm's information environment is poor. I further document that equity and multiple deficiency notice filings elicit more negative reactions and are also more likely to result in actual delisting compared to bid price deficiency notice filings. Together, these results help us understand investors' perceptions and delisting risks associated with quantitative deficiency notice filings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Accounting
Advances in Accounting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting continues to provide an important international forum for discourse among and between academic and practicing accountants on the issues of significance. Emphasis continues to be placed on original commentary, critical analysis and creative research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How does the CEO horizon problem affect the cost of bank loans? Using accounting information to identify corporate acquisition motives: Implications on post-acquisition performance Universal demand laws and stakeholders: Evidence from the auditor's perspective Non-IFRS earnings information in financial highlights of annual reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1