注意缺陷/多动障碍的诊断有效性

Erik G. Willcutt , Caryn L. Carlson
{"title":"注意缺陷/多动障碍的诊断有效性","authors":"Erik G. Willcutt ,&nbsp;Caryn L. Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite considerable research, the validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains controversial. This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive review of the internal and external validity of ADHD as defined in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders<span> (DSM-IV). Results indicate that for most individuals DSM-IV ADHD is a valid disorder in the sense that it is associated with significant impairment in social, academic, and occupational functioning and increased risk of accidental injury across the life span. Additional research is needed, however, to clarify the diagnostic validity of the hyperactive-impulsive type and the discriminant validity of the combined and inattentive subtypes. Other areas in need of further study include potential modifications to the diagnostic conceptualization of the inattentive subtype, developmental trajectories of the subtypes, and methods to address cross-informant diagnostic inconsistencies. Such research is likely to benefit from an etiologically informed approach to examining heterogeneity both across and within subtypes.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":87465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical neuroscience research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.003","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder\",\"authors\":\"Erik G. Willcutt ,&nbsp;Caryn L. Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite considerable research, the validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains controversial. This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive review of the internal and external validity of ADHD as defined in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders<span> (DSM-IV). Results indicate that for most individuals DSM-IV ADHD is a valid disorder in the sense that it is associated with significant impairment in social, academic, and occupational functioning and increased risk of accidental injury across the life span. Additional research is needed, however, to clarify the diagnostic validity of the hyperactive-impulsive type and the discriminant validity of the combined and inattentive subtypes. Other areas in need of further study include potential modifications to the diagnostic conceptualization of the inattentive subtype, developmental trajectories of the subtypes, and methods to address cross-informant diagnostic inconsistencies. Such research is likely to benefit from an etiologically informed approach to examining heterogeneity both across and within subtypes.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical neuroscience research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.003\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical neuroscience research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566277205000691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566277205000691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

尽管有大量的研究,注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的有效性仍然存在争议。本文总结了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)第四版定义的ADHD的内部效度和外部效度的综合综述结果。结果表明,对于大多数人来说,DSM-IV ADHD是一种有效的疾病,因为它与社会、学术和职业功能的显著损害以及一生中意外伤害的风险增加有关。然而,需要进一步的研究来澄清多动-冲动型的诊断有效性以及组合型和注意力不集中亚型的判别有效性。其他需要进一步研究的领域包括对注意力不集中亚型的诊断概念的潜在修改,亚型的发展轨迹,以及解决交叉信息诊断不一致的方法。这样的研究可能受益于病原学上的方法来检查亚型之间和亚型内部的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Despite considerable research, the validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains controversial. This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive review of the internal and external validity of ADHD as defined in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Results indicate that for most individuals DSM-IV ADHD is a valid disorder in the sense that it is associated with significant impairment in social, academic, and occupational functioning and increased risk of accidental injury across the life span. Additional research is needed, however, to clarify the diagnostic validity of the hyperactive-impulsive type and the discriminant validity of the combined and inattentive subtypes. Other areas in need of further study include potential modifications to the diagnostic conceptualization of the inattentive subtype, developmental trajectories of the subtypes, and methods to address cross-informant diagnostic inconsistencies. Such research is likely to benefit from an etiologically informed approach to examining heterogeneity both across and within subtypes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Neurophysiological Features of Sensory Neuronopathy Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Minimally Invasive Craniotomy in the Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Levetiracetam + Oxcarbazepine in the Treatment of Patients with Epilepsy Secondary to Stroke Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Quadruple-Limb Linkage Trainer Combined with Rehabilitation Training in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Effect Evaluation of Madopar Combined with Pramipexole in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1