腹主动脉瘤-一项为期8年的中心治疗患者的流行病学研究,目的是促进人群筛查

Andreia Coelho, Miguel Lobo, Ricardo Gouveia, Pedro Sousa, Jacinta Campos, Rita Augusto, Alexandra Canedo
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤-一项为期8年的中心治疗患者的流行病学研究,目的是促进人群筛查","authors":"Andreia Coelho,&nbsp;Miguel Lobo,&nbsp;Ricardo Gouveia,&nbsp;Pedro Sousa,&nbsp;Jacinta Campos,&nbsp;Rita Augusto,&nbsp;Alexandra Canedo","doi":"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The rupture of an AAA is frequently fatal and accounts for nearly 1% of all deaths. Open surgical intervention is associated with high mortality, but EVAR (Endovascular Aneurysm Repair) is far from consensual owing to lack of level A evidence. Screening is cost effective in male patients over the age of 65 with a 44% reduction in AAA related mortality. This retrospective study had two endpoints, the first was the global assessment of care for both elective and urgent aneurysms in our institution. The second was raising awareness in local primary health care institutions for both the dismal prognosis of untreated AAA and the favorable prognosis of patients treated electively, using outcome data from our centre.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data was extracted from the hospital database concerning urgent and elective repair of AAA from 2007 to 2014.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over the 8 year period, 155 elective aneurysm repairs were performed, 108 through open surgery and 47 through EVAR (with an increasing percentage with time). The early (30 days) mortality rate was 1.3%. We performed 51 aneurysm repairs for ruptured aneurysms (46 open surgery and 5 EVAR), with an intra‐operative mortality of 15.7% and early mortality of 47%. Concerning the geographic distribution of elective and urgent cases, we identified a tendency for assimetry in the distribution of elective and urgent repair of aneurysms. Unfortunately, due to lack of data concerning treatment of patients from our referral area in other centres and pre hospital mortality of ruptured aneurysms, no true incidence rates were possible to calculate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The outcome of patients treated in our institution are comparable with data from literature We disclosed this data to all local primary health care institutions as well as the established recommendations for screening, with the final purpose of raising awareness for the active role they must have in the screening of AAA and treatment of this patients by controlling cardiovascular risk factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30341,"journal":{"name":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 187-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.03.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aneurisma da aorta abdominal – estudo epidemiológico de doentes tratados num centro por um período de 8 anos com o objetivo de promover o rastreio populacional\",\"authors\":\"Andreia Coelho,&nbsp;Miguel Lobo,&nbsp;Ricardo Gouveia,&nbsp;Pedro Sousa,&nbsp;Jacinta Campos,&nbsp;Rita Augusto,&nbsp;Alexandra Canedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The rupture of an AAA is frequently fatal and accounts for nearly 1% of all deaths. Open surgical intervention is associated with high mortality, but EVAR (Endovascular Aneurysm Repair) is far from consensual owing to lack of level A evidence. Screening is cost effective in male patients over the age of 65 with a 44% reduction in AAA related mortality. This retrospective study had two endpoints, the first was the global assessment of care for both elective and urgent aneurysms in our institution. The second was raising awareness in local primary health care institutions for both the dismal prognosis of untreated AAA and the favorable prognosis of patients treated electively, using outcome data from our centre.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data was extracted from the hospital database concerning urgent and elective repair of AAA from 2007 to 2014.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over the 8 year period, 155 elective aneurysm repairs were performed, 108 through open surgery and 47 through EVAR (with an increasing percentage with time). The early (30 days) mortality rate was 1.3%. We performed 51 aneurysm repairs for ruptured aneurysms (46 open surgery and 5 EVAR), with an intra‐operative mortality of 15.7% and early mortality of 47%. Concerning the geographic distribution of elective and urgent cases, we identified a tendency for assimetry in the distribution of elective and urgent repair of aneurysms. Unfortunately, due to lack of data concerning treatment of patients from our referral area in other centres and pre hospital mortality of ruptured aneurysms, no true incidence rates were possible to calculate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The outcome of patients treated in our institution are comparable with data from literature We disclosed this data to all local primary health care institutions as well as the established recommendations for screening, with the final purpose of raising awareness for the active role they must have in the screening of AAA and treatment of this patients by controlling cardiovascular risk factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 187-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.03.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

AAA破裂通常是致命的,占所有死亡人数的近1%。开放手术干预与高死亡率相关,但由于缺乏A级证据,EVAR(血管内动脉瘤修复)远非双方自愿。筛查在65岁以上男性患者中具有成本效益,AAA相关死亡率降低44%。这项回顾性研究有两个终点,第一个是我们机构对选择性和急性病动脉瘤护理的总体评估。二是利用本中心的结果数据,提高当地初级卫生保健机构对未经治疗的AAA患者预后不良和选择性治疗的患者预后良好的认识。方法从医院2007 - 2014年AAA急诊和择期修复数据库中提取数据。结果8年内择期动脉瘤修复155例,其中开放手术108例,EVAR 47例(随时间增加)。早期(30天)死亡率为1.3%。我们对51例破裂动脉瘤进行了动脉瘤修复(46例开腹手术,5例EVAR),术中死亡率为15.7%,早期死亡率为47%。关于选择性和紧急病例的地理分布,我们确定了选择性和紧急修复动脉瘤分布的不对称趋势。不幸的是,由于缺乏有关我们转诊地区的患者在其他中心的治疗和院前动脉瘤破裂死亡率的数据,因此无法计算真实的发病率。结论我院患者的治疗结果与文献数据相当。我们向当地所有初级卫生保健机构披露了这些数据,并制定了筛查建议,最终目的是提高他们在筛查AAA和通过控制心血管危险因素治疗AAA患者中必须发挥的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aneurisma da aorta abdominal – estudo epidemiológico de doentes tratados num centro por um período de 8 anos com o objetivo de promover o rastreio populacional

Introduction

The rupture of an AAA is frequently fatal and accounts for nearly 1% of all deaths. Open surgical intervention is associated with high mortality, but EVAR (Endovascular Aneurysm Repair) is far from consensual owing to lack of level A evidence. Screening is cost effective in male patients over the age of 65 with a 44% reduction in AAA related mortality. This retrospective study had two endpoints, the first was the global assessment of care for both elective and urgent aneurysms in our institution. The second was raising awareness in local primary health care institutions for both the dismal prognosis of untreated AAA and the favorable prognosis of patients treated electively, using outcome data from our centre.

Methods

Data was extracted from the hospital database concerning urgent and elective repair of AAA from 2007 to 2014.

Results

Over the 8 year period, 155 elective aneurysm repairs were performed, 108 through open surgery and 47 through EVAR (with an increasing percentage with time). The early (30 days) mortality rate was 1.3%. We performed 51 aneurysm repairs for ruptured aneurysms (46 open surgery and 5 EVAR), with an intra‐operative mortality of 15.7% and early mortality of 47%. Concerning the geographic distribution of elective and urgent cases, we identified a tendency for assimetry in the distribution of elective and urgent repair of aneurysms. Unfortunately, due to lack of data concerning treatment of patients from our referral area in other centres and pre hospital mortality of ruptured aneurysms, no true incidence rates were possible to calculate.

Conclusions

The outcome of patients treated in our institution are comparable with data from literature We disclosed this data to all local primary health care institutions as well as the established recommendations for screening, with the final purpose of raising awareness for the active role they must have in the screening of AAA and treatment of this patients by controlling cardiovascular risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tuberculous aortitis, a case report Endovascular treatment of synchronous and metachronous aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. Is there an increase in the procedural risk? Fístula arteriovenosa radial pós‐cateterismo cardíaco – abordagem terapêutica Aplicação do Glasgow Aneurysm Score como modelo preditivo de mortalidade em doentes com rutura de aneurisma da aorta abdominal Reparação endovascular na rutura aorto‐ilíaca
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1