跨学科研究项目对全球北方和南方的影响是什么?比较分析

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100180
Rea Pärli , Manuel Fischer , Eva Lieberherr
{"title":"跨学科研究项目对全球北方和南方的影响是什么?比较分析","authors":"Rea Pärli ,&nbsp;Manuel Fischer ,&nbsp;Eva Lieberherr","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transdisciplinary research (TD) integrates knowledge from different scientific disciplines, as well as from research and practice. Research and practice therefore describe TD as well-suited for addressing complex sustainability challenges. However, the effects of TD on sustainable development are difficult to assess, as such projects produce manifold, interconnected effects through nonlinear processes, contingent on different contexts. In this article, we use a systematic literature review of 101 TD projects to assess the different effects of TD projects and their interconnections. We distinguish between North-South TD projects and TD projects within the global North. Due to differences in terms of historical development and context, we expect to observe differences in the effects they achieve. We find that North-South projects scored higher for societal effects and uptake of knowledge, while projects in the global North produced more tangible outputs, such as academic publications. In terms of interconnections of effects, N-S projects emphasize inclusion more strongly than global North projects, due to an increased awareness of differences between different project participants. However, effects related to uptake of knowledge, learning, and societal effects are often interconnected in both types of projects. This article improves our understanding of the prominence of different effects of TD projects, the interconnections between effects they produce, and the differences between N-S and North projects. Acknowledging this diversity of effects is important, not least for evaluating the efficacy of TD projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000585/pdfft?md5=679fc01c0618495cade65778bafc6023&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049022000585-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the effects of transdisciplinary research projects in the global North and South? A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rea Pärli ,&nbsp;Manuel Fischer ,&nbsp;Eva Lieberherr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Transdisciplinary research (TD) integrates knowledge from different scientific disciplines, as well as from research and practice. Research and practice therefore describe TD as well-suited for addressing complex sustainability challenges. However, the effects of TD on sustainable development are difficult to assess, as such projects produce manifold, interconnected effects through nonlinear processes, contingent on different contexts. In this article, we use a systematic literature review of 101 TD projects to assess the different effects of TD projects and their interconnections. We distinguish between North-South TD projects and TD projects within the global North. Due to differences in terms of historical development and context, we expect to observe differences in the effects they achieve. We find that North-South projects scored higher for societal effects and uptake of knowledge, while projects in the global North produced more tangible outputs, such as academic publications. In terms of interconnections of effects, N-S projects emphasize inclusion more strongly than global North projects, due to an increased awareness of differences between different project participants. However, effects related to uptake of knowledge, learning, and societal effects are often interconnected in both types of projects. This article improves our understanding of the prominence of different effects of TD projects, the interconnections between effects they produce, and the differences between N-S and North projects. Acknowledging this diversity of effects is important, not least for evaluating the efficacy of TD projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000585/pdfft?md5=679fc01c0618495cade65778bafc6023&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049022000585-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049022000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

跨学科研究(TD)整合了不同科学学科以及研究和实践的知识。因此,研究和实践将TD描述为非常适合解决复杂的可持续性挑战。然而,发展中国家对可持续发展的影响很难评估,因为这些项目通过非线性过程产生多种相互关联的影响,取决于不同的背景。在本文中,我们对101个输配电项目进行了系统的文献综述,以评估输配电项目及其相互联系的不同影响。我们区分南北输配电项目和全球北方的输配电项目。由于历史发展和背景的不同,我们期望观察到它们所达到的效果的差异。我们发现,南北项目在社会效应和知识吸收方面得分更高,而全球北方的项目产生了更多有形的产出,如学术出版物。就影响的相互联系而言,由于对不同项目参与者之间差异的认识增加,N-S项目比全球北方项目更强调包容性。然而,在这两种类型的项目中,与获取知识、学习和社会影响相关的影响往往是相互关联的。本文提高了我们对输配电项目的不同影响的重要性,它们产生的影响之间的相互联系,以及南北项目之间的差异的理解。承认这种影响的多样性是很重要的,尤其是在评估输配电项目的有效性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the effects of transdisciplinary research projects in the global North and South? A comparative analysis

Transdisciplinary research (TD) integrates knowledge from different scientific disciplines, as well as from research and practice. Research and practice therefore describe TD as well-suited for addressing complex sustainability challenges. However, the effects of TD on sustainable development are difficult to assess, as such projects produce manifold, interconnected effects through nonlinear processes, contingent on different contexts. In this article, we use a systematic literature review of 101 TD projects to assess the different effects of TD projects and their interconnections. We distinguish between North-South TD projects and TD projects within the global North. Due to differences in terms of historical development and context, we expect to observe differences in the effects they achieve. We find that North-South projects scored higher for societal effects and uptake of knowledge, while projects in the global North produced more tangible outputs, such as academic publications. In terms of interconnections of effects, N-S projects emphasize inclusion more strongly than global North projects, due to an increased awareness of differences between different project participants. However, effects related to uptake of knowledge, learning, and societal effects are often interconnected in both types of projects. This article improves our understanding of the prominence of different effects of TD projects, the interconnections between effects they produce, and the differences between N-S and North projects. Acknowledging this diversity of effects is important, not least for evaluating the efficacy of TD projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
期刊最新文献
Achieving sustainability in family farming Green bonds and sustainable business models in Nordic energy companies Sustainability solutions: A new article type to address critical environmental challenges of the Anthropocene The European green deal, retail investors and sustainable investments: A perspective article covering economic, behavioral, and regulatory insights Performance of Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica on the evaluation of artificial wetlands as an alternative for wastewater treatment in rural areas of the Ecuadorian Andes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1