在多元文化背景下,性别歧视是伴侣暴力的预测因素

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Anuario De Psicologia Juridica Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001
Ainara Arnoso, Izaskun Ibabe, Maitane Arnoso, Edurne Elgorriaga
{"title":"在多元文化背景下,性别歧视是伴侣暴力的预测因素","authors":"Ainara Arnoso,&nbsp;Izaskun Ibabe,&nbsp;Maitane Arnoso,&nbsp;Edurne Elgorriaga","doi":"10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this research was to study the role of different forms of sexism as predictors of intimate partner violence, and also to explore possible differences in these variables as a function of the cultural context and sex. The sample was made up of 251 adults living in Spain, 28% of them were native and 72% immigrants (Latin America and Africa) of both sexes, aged 18 to 65. Eleven per cent of participants reported some form of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, and sexual) and 9% of participants were cases of bidirectional violence whereas 2% were cases of unidirectional violence. In general, males and immigrants showed higher scores in different types of sexism, whereas women and natives showed lower scores. The results of the structural model showed that all the expressions of sexism analyzed explained intimate partner violence weakly (3%). Implications of this finding are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El sexismo como predictor de la violencia de pareja en un contexto multicultural\",\"authors\":\"Ainara Arnoso,&nbsp;Izaskun Ibabe,&nbsp;Maitane Arnoso,&nbsp;Edurne Elgorriaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this research was to study the role of different forms of sexism as predictors of intimate partner violence, and also to explore possible differences in these variables as a function of the cultural context and sex. The sample was made up of 251 adults living in Spain, 28% of them were native and 72% immigrants (Latin America and Africa) of both sexes, aged 18 to 65. Eleven per cent of participants reported some form of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, and sexual) and 9% of participants were cases of bidirectional violence whereas 2% were cases of unidirectional violence. In general, males and immigrants showed higher scores in different types of sexism, whereas women and natives showed lower scores. The results of the structural model showed that all the expressions of sexism analyzed explained intimate partner violence weakly (3%). Implications of this finding are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1133074017300156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1133074017300156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

本研究的目的是研究不同形式的性别歧视在亲密伴侣暴力预测中的作用,并探讨这些变量在文化背景和性别的作用下可能存在的差异。样本由251名生活在西班牙的成年人组成,其中28%是本地人,72%是移民(拉丁美洲和非洲),年龄在18岁到65岁之间。11%的参与者报告了某种形式的亲密伴侣暴力(身体、心理和性暴力),9%的参与者是双向暴力案件,2%是单向暴力案件。总体而言,男性和移民在不同类型的性别歧视中得分较高,而女性和本地人得分较低。结构模型的结果显示,所分析的所有性别歧视表达对亲密伴侣暴力的解释都很弱(3%)。讨论了这一发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El sexismo como predictor de la violencia de pareja en un contexto multicultural

The aim of this research was to study the role of different forms of sexism as predictors of intimate partner violence, and also to explore possible differences in these variables as a function of the cultural context and sex. The sample was made up of 251 adults living in Spain, 28% of them were native and 72% immigrants (Latin America and Africa) of both sexes, aged 18 to 65. Eleven per cent of participants reported some form of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, and sexual) and 9% of participants were cases of bidirectional violence whereas 2% were cases of unidirectional violence. In general, males and immigrants showed higher scores in different types of sexism, whereas women and natives showed lower scores. The results of the structural model showed that all the expressions of sexism analyzed explained intimate partner violence weakly (3%). Implications of this finding are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Odio y la Violencia hacia el Exogrupo. Análisis Psicosocial de una Muestra de Personas Condenadas por Delitos de Odio Profiles of Adolescents who Abuse their Parents: A Gender-based Analysis Los Factores Psicosociales en el Suicidio de Presos en Prisiones Europeas: una Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis Desconexión Moral y Delincuencia en Población Penitenciaria Adulta: una Revisión Metaanalítica Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance of the Mechanisms of the Moral Disengagement Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1