活体肾脏捐献者档案指数预测移植后长期结果的临床意义:来自韩国器官移植登记处的结果。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.23876/j.krcp.22.266
Jong Ho Kim, Sang Ho Lee, Jin Sug Kim, Hyeon Seok Hwang, Hyunmin Ko, Cheol-Woong Jung, Deok Gie Kim, Yeong Hoon Kim, Jaeseok Yang, Curie Ahn, Kyung Hwan Jeong
{"title":"活体肾脏捐献者档案指数预测移植后长期结果的临床意义:来自韩国器官移植登记处的结果。","authors":"Jong Ho Kim, Sang Ho Lee, Jin Sug Kim, Hyeon Seok Hwang, Hyunmin Ko, Cheol-Woong Jung, Deok Gie Kim, Yeong Hoon Kim, Jaeseok Yang, Curie Ahn, Kyung Hwan Jeong","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.22.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The usefulness of the living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI) has not been widely demonstrated; therefore, it requires verification before clinical application. We analyzed the LKDPI using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) to confirm whether the LKDPI can be used to predict the survival of allografts in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) patients in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was obtained from the KOTRY database. A total of 2,598 kidney recipients registered in the KOTRY database were enrolled between May 2014 and December 2020. Donor and recipient information was observed, and the LKDPI was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median LKDPI score was 15.5 with a follow-up duration of 33.7 ± 16.1 months. According to LKDPI scores (group 1, <0; group 2, 0-20; group 3, 20-40; and group 4, >40), LKDPI group 4 had significantly higher death-censored graft loss than LKDPI group 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06- 3.40; p = 0.03). When divided based on the cutoff value (LKDPI, 36.6), the high LKDPI group had higher graft loss than the low LKDPI group (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.37-3.34; p < 0.001). When follow-up was repeated after transplantation, it was confirmed that the higher the LKDPI value was, the lower the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that LKDPI can serve as an independent predictor for assessing the risk of allograft failure and transplant outcomes in Korean LDKT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"189-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical significance of the living kidney donor profile index for predicting long-term posttransplant outcomes: results from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Ho Kim, Sang Ho Lee, Jin Sug Kim, Hyeon Seok Hwang, Hyunmin Ko, Cheol-Woong Jung, Deok Gie Kim, Yeong Hoon Kim, Jaeseok Yang, Curie Ahn, Kyung Hwan Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.23876/j.krcp.22.266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The usefulness of the living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI) has not been widely demonstrated; therefore, it requires verification before clinical application. We analyzed the LKDPI using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) to confirm whether the LKDPI can be used to predict the survival of allografts in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) patients in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was obtained from the KOTRY database. A total of 2,598 kidney recipients registered in the KOTRY database were enrolled between May 2014 and December 2020. Donor and recipient information was observed, and the LKDPI was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median LKDPI score was 15.5 with a follow-up duration of 33.7 ± 16.1 months. According to LKDPI scores (group 1, <0; group 2, 0-20; group 3, 20-40; and group 4, >40), LKDPI group 4 had significantly higher death-censored graft loss than LKDPI group 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06- 3.40; p = 0.03). When divided based on the cutoff value (LKDPI, 36.6), the high LKDPI group had higher graft loss than the low LKDPI group (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.37-3.34; p < 0.001). When follow-up was repeated after transplantation, it was confirmed that the higher the LKDPI value was, the lower the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that LKDPI can serve as an independent predictor for assessing the risk of allograft failure and transplant outcomes in Korean LDKT patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"189-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.22.266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.22.266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:活体肾脏捐献者档案指数(LKDPI)的有用性尚未得到广泛证明;因此,它需要在临床应用前进行验证。我们使用韩国器官移植登记处(KOTRY)的数据分析了LKDPI,以确认LKDPI是否可以用于预测韩国活体供肾移植(LDKT)患者的同种异体移植物存活率。方法:从KOTRY数据库中获得研究人群。2014年5月至2020年12月期间,共有2598名肾脏接受者在KOTRY数据库中登记。观察供体和受体信息,并测量LKDPI。结果:LKDPI中位评分为15.5,随访时间为33.7±16.1个月。根据LKDPI评分(第1组,40),LKDPI第4组的死亡审查移植物损失显著高于LKDPI第一组(危险比[HR],1.89;95%置信区间[CI],1.06-3.40;p=0.03),高LKDPI组的移植物损失高于低LKDPI的组(HR,2.14;95%CI,1.37-3.34;p<0.001),平均估计肾小球滤过率越低(p<0.001)。结论:本研究证实LKDPI可以作为评估韩国LDKT患者同种异体移植失败风险和移植结果的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical significance of the living kidney donor profile index for predicting long-term posttransplant outcomes: results from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry.

Background: The usefulness of the living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI) has not been widely demonstrated; therefore, it requires verification before clinical application. We analyzed the LKDPI using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) to confirm whether the LKDPI can be used to predict the survival of allografts in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) patients in Korea.

Methods: The study population was obtained from the KOTRY database. A total of 2,598 kidney recipients registered in the KOTRY database were enrolled between May 2014 and December 2020. Donor and recipient information was observed, and the LKDPI was measured.

Results: Median LKDPI score was 15.5 with a follow-up duration of 33.7 ± 16.1 months. According to LKDPI scores (group 1, <0; group 2, 0-20; group 3, 20-40; and group 4, >40), LKDPI group 4 had significantly higher death-censored graft loss than LKDPI group 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06- 3.40; p = 0.03). When divided based on the cutoff value (LKDPI, 36.6), the high LKDPI group had higher graft loss than the low LKDPI group (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.37-3.34; p < 0.001). When follow-up was repeated after transplantation, it was confirmed that the higher the LKDPI value was, the lower the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study confirmed that LKDPI can serve as an independent predictor for assessing the risk of allograft failure and transplant outcomes in Korean LDKT patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
期刊最新文献
Pathophysiology and potential treatment of uremic sarcopenia. Protein-energy wasting in chronic kidney disease: mechanisms responsible for loss of muscle mass and function. Quality of life, socioeconomic impact, and medical consideration of living kidney donors: a comprehensive survey in Korea. Renal fibrosis: research progress on mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. A novel approach to the relation of multi-pollutant effect and kidney dysfunction: data analysis from the Korean National Environmental Health Survey Cycle 3 (2015-2017).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1