沙特阿拉伯公众对湿杯疗法(Hijama)的看法。

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.5.176
Suhaib Ibrahim Alkhamaiseh, Amjad H Bazzari, Abdel Hadi Al Jafari, Firas H Bazzari
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯公众对湿杯疗法(Hijama)的看法。","authors":"Suhaib Ibrahim Alkhamaiseh,&nbsp;Amjad H Bazzari,&nbsp;Abdel Hadi Al Jafari,&nbsp;Firas H Bazzari","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.5.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>: Wet cupping (Hijama), a form of alternative medicine, is widely practiced in Middle Eastern countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Although considerable effort has been put into increasing public awareness about the safe and proper practice of wet cupping, studies on the attitudes, knowledge, and awareness levels of the Saudi Arabian public are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>: This study evaluated public attitudes toward the effectiveness, safety, and expected standards of practicing wet cupping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire and involved 909 complete responses. The respondents were Saudi adults with a mean age of 30.43 ± 11.4 years (males: 42.1%, females: 57.9%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: The study revealed that most participants believed that although wet cupping is a beneficial (84.6%), well-known form of alternative medicine (82.4%) without harmful side effects (63.9%), it is not suitable for treating all diseases (72.3%) or everyone (66.8%). Most participants prefer wet cupping to be done at specialized centers (84.6%) by practitioners with confirmed qualifications (88.6%) using valid and sterile instruments (88.9%). The main demographic factor influencing participant responses was age, which was associated with more positive perceptions. Female, single, college-educated, and middle-aged respondents had more cautious attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>: Our results indicate that Saudis support the use of wet cupping as an alternative medicine for select diseases and that individuals have adequate awareness of the practice's safety standards to avoid potential risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Public Perceptions on Wet Cupping Therapy (Hijama) in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Suhaib Ibrahim Alkhamaiseh,&nbsp;Amjad H Bazzari,&nbsp;Abdel Hadi Al Jafari,&nbsp;Firas H Bazzari\",\"doi\":\"10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.5.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>: Wet cupping (Hijama), a form of alternative medicine, is widely practiced in Middle Eastern countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Although considerable effort has been put into increasing public awareness about the safe and proper practice of wet cupping, studies on the attitudes, knowledge, and awareness levels of the Saudi Arabian public are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>: This study evaluated public attitudes toward the effectiveness, safety, and expected standards of practicing wet cupping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire and involved 909 complete responses. The respondents were Saudi adults with a mean age of 30.43 ± 11.4 years (males: 42.1%, females: 57.9%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: The study revealed that most participants believed that although wet cupping is a beneficial (84.6%), well-known form of alternative medicine (82.4%) without harmful side effects (63.9%), it is not suitable for treating all diseases (72.3%) or everyone (66.8%). Most participants prefer wet cupping to be done at specialized centers (84.6%) by practitioners with confirmed qualifications (88.6%) using valid and sterile instruments (88.9%). The main demographic factor influencing participant responses was age, which was associated with more positive perceptions. Female, single, college-educated, and middle-aged respondents had more cautious attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>: Our results indicate that Saudis support the use of wet cupping as an alternative medicine for select diseases and that individuals have adequate awareness of the practice's safety standards to avoid potential risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.5.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.5.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:湿拔罐(Hijama)是一种替代医学,在中东国家,尤其是沙特阿拉伯,广泛使用。尽管已经付出了相当大的努力来提高公众对湿拔罐的安全和适当做法的认识,但对沙特阿拉伯公众的态度、知识和意识水平的研究仍然缺乏。目的:本研究评估了公众对湿拔罐的有效性、安全性和预期标准的态度。方法:这项横断面研究使用在线问卷进行,涉及909份完整的回复。受访者为沙特成年人,平均年龄30.43±11.4岁(男性:42.1%,女性:57.9%),它不适合治疗所有疾病(72.3%)或所有人(66.8%)。大多数参与者更喜欢在专业中心(84.6%)由具有确认资质的从业者(88.6%)使用有效和无菌的仪器(88.9%)进行湿拔罐。影响参与者反应的主要人口统计因素是年龄,这与更积极的看法有关。女性、单身、受过大学教育和中年受访者的态度更为谨慎。结论:我们的研究结果表明,沙特人支持使用湿拔罐作为治疗某些疾病的替代药物,并且个人对该做法的安全标准有足够的认识,以避免潜在的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Public Perceptions on Wet Cupping Therapy (Hijama) in Saudi Arabia.

Background: : Wet cupping (Hijama), a form of alternative medicine, is widely practiced in Middle Eastern countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Although considerable effort has been put into increasing public awareness about the safe and proper practice of wet cupping, studies on the attitudes, knowledge, and awareness levels of the Saudi Arabian public are lacking.

Objectives: : This study evaluated public attitudes toward the effectiveness, safety, and expected standards of practicing wet cupping.

Methods: : This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire and involved 909 complete responses. The respondents were Saudi adults with a mean age of 30.43 ± 11.4 years (males: 42.1%, females: 57.9%).

Results: : The study revealed that most participants believed that although wet cupping is a beneficial (84.6%), well-known form of alternative medicine (82.4%) without harmful side effects (63.9%), it is not suitable for treating all diseases (72.3%) or everyone (66.8%). Most participants prefer wet cupping to be done at specialized centers (84.6%) by practitioners with confirmed qualifications (88.6%) using valid and sterile instruments (88.9%). The main demographic factor influencing participant responses was age, which was associated with more positive perceptions. Female, single, college-educated, and middle-aged respondents had more cautious attitudes.

Conclusion: : Our results indicate that Saudis support the use of wet cupping as an alternative medicine for select diseases and that individuals have adequate awareness of the practice's safety standards to avoid potential risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture for Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia: a Case Report. Electroacupuncture Protocol for Sensory and Motor Function Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial. The Transformation of Acupuncture Practice Using Ultrasonography: Expert Opinions. Acupoint Autohemotherapy Alleviates Airway Inflammation in Asthmatic Rats via Upregulating Expression of Hemeoxygenase-1. Auriculotherapy for Labour Pain Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1