蛋白质组学生物标志物开发的贝叶斯方法

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology EuPA Open Proteomics Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.euprot.2015.08.001
Belinda Hernández , Stephen R Pennington , Andrew C Parnell
{"title":"蛋白质组学生物标志物开发的贝叶斯方法","authors":"Belinda Hernández ,&nbsp;Stephen R Pennington ,&nbsp;Andrew C Parnell","doi":"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The advent of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry has seen a dramatic increase in the amount of data derived from proteomic biomarker discovery. These experiments have seemingly identified many potential candidate biomarkers. Frustratingly, very few of these candidates have been evaluated and validated sufficiently such that that they have progressed to the stage of routine clinical use. It is becoming apparent that the statistical methods used to evaluate the performance of new candidate biomarkers are a major limitation in their development. Bayesian methods offer some advantages over traditional statistical and machine learning methods. In particular they can incorporate external information into current experiments so as to guide biomarker selection. Further, they can be more robust to over-fitting than other approaches, especially when the number of samples used for discovery is relatively small.</p><p>In this review we provide an introduction to Bayesian inference and demonstrate some of the advantages of using a Bayesian framework. We summarize how Bayesian methods have been used previously in proteomics and other areas of bioinformatics. Finally, we describe some popular and emerging Bayesian models from the statistical literature and provide a worked tutorial including code snippets to show how these methods may be applied for the evaluation of proteomic biomarkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38260,"journal":{"name":"EuPA Open Proteomics","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.08.001","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian methods for proteomic biomarker development\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Hernández ,&nbsp;Stephen R Pennington ,&nbsp;Andrew C Parnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The advent of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry has seen a dramatic increase in the amount of data derived from proteomic biomarker discovery. These experiments have seemingly identified many potential candidate biomarkers. Frustratingly, very few of these candidates have been evaluated and validated sufficiently such that that they have progressed to the stage of routine clinical use. It is becoming apparent that the statistical methods used to evaluate the performance of new candidate biomarkers are a major limitation in their development. Bayesian methods offer some advantages over traditional statistical and machine learning methods. In particular they can incorporate external information into current experiments so as to guide biomarker selection. Further, they can be more robust to over-fitting than other approaches, especially when the number of samples used for discovery is relatively small.</p><p>In this review we provide an introduction to Bayesian inference and demonstrate some of the advantages of using a Bayesian framework. We summarize how Bayesian methods have been used previously in proteomics and other areas of bioinformatics. Finally, we describe some popular and emerging Bayesian models from the statistical literature and provide a worked tutorial including code snippets to show how these methods may be applied for the evaluation of proteomic biomarkers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 54-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuPA Open Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

液相色谱-质谱法的出现使蛋白质组学生物标志物发现的数据量急剧增加。这些实验似乎已经确定了许多潜在的候选生物标志物。令人沮丧的是,这些候选药物很少得到充分的评估和验证,以至于它们已经发展到常规临床使用的阶段。越来越明显的是,用于评估新候选生物标志物性能的统计方法是其发展的主要限制。与传统的统计和机器学习方法相比,贝叶斯方法具有一些优势。特别是,它们可以将外部信息纳入当前的实验中,从而指导生物标志物的选择。此外,它们对过度拟合的鲁棒性比其他方法更强,特别是当用于发现的样本数量相对较少时。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了贝叶斯推理,并展示了使用贝叶斯框架的一些优点。我们总结了贝叶斯方法在蛋白质组学和其他生物信息学领域的应用。最后,我们从统计文献中描述了一些流行的和新兴的贝叶斯模型,并提供了一个工作教程,包括代码片段,以展示如何将这些方法应用于蛋白质组学生物标志物的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bayesian methods for proteomic biomarker development

The advent of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry has seen a dramatic increase in the amount of data derived from proteomic biomarker discovery. These experiments have seemingly identified many potential candidate biomarkers. Frustratingly, very few of these candidates have been evaluated and validated sufficiently such that that they have progressed to the stage of routine clinical use. It is becoming apparent that the statistical methods used to evaluate the performance of new candidate biomarkers are a major limitation in their development. Bayesian methods offer some advantages over traditional statistical and machine learning methods. In particular they can incorporate external information into current experiments so as to guide biomarker selection. Further, they can be more robust to over-fitting than other approaches, especially when the number of samples used for discovery is relatively small.

In this review we provide an introduction to Bayesian inference and demonstrate some of the advantages of using a Bayesian framework. We summarize how Bayesian methods have been used previously in proteomics and other areas of bioinformatics. Finally, we describe some popular and emerging Bayesian models from the statistical literature and provide a worked tutorial including code snippets to show how these methods may be applied for the evaluation of proteomic biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EuPA Open Proteomics
EuPA Open Proteomics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the EuBIC-MS 2020 Developers’ Meeting Editorial: The next generation in (EuPA Open) Proteomics Aims & scope Proceedings of the EuBIC Winter School 2019 Introducing the YPIC challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1