仪器平台和实验工作流程的实验室间评估,用于定量准确性和可重复性评估

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology EuPA Open Proteomics Pub Date : 2015-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001
Andrew J. Percy , Jessica Tamura-Wells , Juan Pablo Albar , Kerman Aloria , Ardeshir Amirkhani , Gabriel D.T. Araujo , Jesus M. Arizmendi , Francisco J. Blanco , Francesc Canals , Jin-Young Cho , Núria Colomé-Calls , Fernando J. Corrales , Gilberto Domont , Guadalupe Espadas , Patricia Fernandez-Puente , Concha Gil , Paul A. Haynes , Maria Luisa Hernáez , Jin Young Kim , Arthur Kopylov , Christoph H. Borchers
{"title":"仪器平台和实验工作流程的实验室间评估,用于定量准确性和可重复性评估","authors":"Andrew J. Percy ,&nbsp;Jessica Tamura-Wells ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Albar ,&nbsp;Kerman Aloria ,&nbsp;Ardeshir Amirkhani ,&nbsp;Gabriel D.T. Araujo ,&nbsp;Jesus M. Arizmendi ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Blanco ,&nbsp;Francesc Canals ,&nbsp;Jin-Young Cho ,&nbsp;Núria Colomé-Calls ,&nbsp;Fernando J. Corrales ,&nbsp;Gilberto Domont ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Espadas ,&nbsp;Patricia Fernandez-Puente ,&nbsp;Concha Gil ,&nbsp;Paul A. Haynes ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Hernáez ,&nbsp;Jin Young Kim ,&nbsp;Arthur Kopylov ,&nbsp;Christoph H. Borchers","doi":"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The reproducibility of plasma protein quantitation between laboratories and between instrument types was examined in a large-scale international study involving 16 laboratories and 19 LC–MS/MS platforms, using two kits designed to evaluate instrument performance and one kit designed to evaluate the entire bottom-up workflow. There was little effect of instrument type on the quality of the results, demonstrating the robustness of LC/MRM-MS with isotopically labeled standards. Technician skill was a factor, as errors in sample preparation and sub-optimal LC–MS performance were evident. This highlights the importance of proper training and routine quality control before quantitation is done on patient samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38260,"journal":{"name":"EuPA Open Proteomics","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 6-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessment\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Percy ,&nbsp;Jessica Tamura-Wells ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Albar ,&nbsp;Kerman Aloria ,&nbsp;Ardeshir Amirkhani ,&nbsp;Gabriel D.T. Araujo ,&nbsp;Jesus M. Arizmendi ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Blanco ,&nbsp;Francesc Canals ,&nbsp;Jin-Young Cho ,&nbsp;Núria Colomé-Calls ,&nbsp;Fernando J. Corrales ,&nbsp;Gilberto Domont ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Espadas ,&nbsp;Patricia Fernandez-Puente ,&nbsp;Concha Gil ,&nbsp;Paul A. Haynes ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Hernáez ,&nbsp;Jin Young Kim ,&nbsp;Arthur Kopylov ,&nbsp;Christoph H. Borchers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The reproducibility of plasma protein quantitation between laboratories and between instrument types was examined in a large-scale international study involving 16 laboratories and 19 LC–MS/MS platforms, using two kits designed to evaluate instrument performance and one kit designed to evaluate the entire bottom-up workflow. There was little effect of instrument type on the quality of the results, demonstrating the robustness of LC/MRM-MS with isotopically labeled standards. Technician skill was a factor, as errors in sample preparation and sub-optimal LC–MS performance were evident. This highlights the importance of proper training and routine quality control before quantitation is done on patient samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 6-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuPA Open Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuPA Open Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

在一项涉及16个实验室和19个LC-MS /MS平台的大型国际研究中,使用两种用于评估仪器性能的试剂盒和一种用于评估整个自下而上工作流程的试剂盒,检查了血浆蛋白定量在实验室之间和仪器类型之间的可重复性。仪器类型对结果质量的影响较小,表明了同位素标记标准品LC/MRM-MS的稳健性。技术人员的技能是一个因素,因为样品制备中的错误和次优的LC-MS性能是显而易见的。这突出了在对患者样本进行定量之前进行适当培训和常规质量控制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessment

The reproducibility of plasma protein quantitation between laboratories and between instrument types was examined in a large-scale international study involving 16 laboratories and 19 LC–MS/MS platforms, using two kits designed to evaluate instrument performance and one kit designed to evaluate the entire bottom-up workflow. There was little effect of instrument type on the quality of the results, demonstrating the robustness of LC/MRM-MS with isotopically labeled standards. Technician skill was a factor, as errors in sample preparation and sub-optimal LC–MS performance were evident. This highlights the importance of proper training and routine quality control before quantitation is done on patient samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EuPA Open Proteomics
EuPA Open Proteomics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the EuBIC-MS 2020 Developers’ Meeting Editorial: The next generation in (EuPA Open) Proteomics Aims & scope Proceedings of the EuBIC Winter School 2019 Introducing the YPIC challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1