P96

Q3 Medicine Ejc Supplements Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.070
T. Nikitenko , O. Rymar , S. Malyutina , L. Shcherbakova , E. Veryovkin , S. Kurilovich , Yu. Ragino , M. Voevoda
{"title":"P96","authors":"T. Nikitenko ,&nbsp;O. Rymar ,&nbsp;S. Malyutina ,&nbsp;L. Shcherbakova ,&nbsp;E. Veryovkin ,&nbsp;S. Kurilovich ,&nbsp;Yu. Ragino ,&nbsp;M. Voevoda","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Obesity, associated with metabolic syndrome, is considered a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC).</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the levels of metabolic syndrome (MS) components in persons with CRC and control in the frame of nested “case-control” design.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>The study was carried out on the basis of a comparison of databases from epidemiological study The HAPIEE project and CRC register. The patients examined in the HAPIEE project, who had developed CRC during 10-year follow-up period according to the register of cancer (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->92, men-48, women-44, mean age 60.7<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->6.9<!--> <!-->years) were included in analysis. The control group, matched by sex and age, was also formed from the HAPIEE database (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->184, men-96, women-88, mean age 60.7<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->6.8<!--> <!-->years). We used MS criteria’s according to NCEP ATP – III (2001). The data was processed using statistical program SPSS 13.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) had no significant differences in the studied groups, the average BMI value in CRC group was 28.6<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->5.3<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> vs 28.4<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->5.6<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> in control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.70) and WC value in CRC group was 94.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->11.7<!--> <!-->cm vs 94.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->13.6<!--> <!-->cm in control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90). The percentage of patients with abdominal obesity was 41.3% in patients with CRC vs 42.9% in the control group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.70).</p><p>The average value of total cholesterol was equally high in both groups (246.8<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->52.5<!--> <!-->mg/dL in patients with CRC and 239.8<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->47.0<!--> <!-->mg/dL in the control group), with large individual variation but no significant difference (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27). The average level of HDL cholesterol in CRC group was within normal limits and also did not differ from control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.60). The average level of TG in CRC patients was slightly lower than in the control group: 127.2<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->58.5<!--> <!-->mg/dl vs 144.6<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->80.8<!--> <!-->mg/dL (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.07). The average level of glucose did not differ in patients with CRC and in control: 5.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->1,2<!--> <!-->mmol/l vs 6.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2.1<!--> <!-->mmol/L (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.40). In patients with CRC systolic blood pressure was significantly lower than in control group: 142.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->21.3<!--> <!-->mmHg vs 150.4<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->23.7<!--> <!-->mmHg (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005). The level of diastolic blood pressure was slightly lower than in the control group compared to CRC (88.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->11.2<!--> <!-->mmHg vs91.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->13.4<!--> <!-->mmHg, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.06). The proportions of patients with low HDL cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia did not differ between the studied groups, but proportion of hypertension among controls was higher compared to the patients with CRC (85.3% vs 69.6% <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In studied sample, we did not found the differences in the values of anthropometric indicators of metabolic syndrome, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose between patients with colorectal cancer and control. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as hypertension frequency were significantly lower in CRC group than in the control group. Further analysis including stage and localization of CRC is required.</p><p><em>The HAPIEE project is supported by Wellcome Trust (WT081081AIA).</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11675,"journal":{"name":"Ejc Supplements","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 39-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P96\",\"authors\":\"T. Nikitenko ,&nbsp;O. Rymar ,&nbsp;S. Malyutina ,&nbsp;L. Shcherbakova ,&nbsp;E. Veryovkin ,&nbsp;S. Kurilovich ,&nbsp;Yu. Ragino ,&nbsp;M. Voevoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Obesity, associated with metabolic syndrome, is considered a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC).</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the levels of metabolic syndrome (MS) components in persons with CRC and control in the frame of nested “case-control” design.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>The study was carried out on the basis of a comparison of databases from epidemiological study The HAPIEE project and CRC register. The patients examined in the HAPIEE project, who had developed CRC during 10-year follow-up period according to the register of cancer (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->92, men-48, women-44, mean age 60.7<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->6.9<!--> <!-->years) were included in analysis. The control group, matched by sex and age, was also formed from the HAPIEE database (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->184, men-96, women-88, mean age 60.7<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->6.8<!--> <!-->years). We used MS criteria’s according to NCEP ATP – III (2001). The data was processed using statistical program SPSS 13.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) had no significant differences in the studied groups, the average BMI value in CRC group was 28.6<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->5.3<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> vs 28.4<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->5.6<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> in control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.70) and WC value in CRC group was 94.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->11.7<!--> <!-->cm vs 94.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->13.6<!--> <!-->cm in control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90). The percentage of patients with abdominal obesity was 41.3% in patients with CRC vs 42.9% in the control group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.70).</p><p>The average value of total cholesterol was equally high in both groups (246.8<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->52.5<!--> <!-->mg/dL in patients with CRC and 239.8<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->47.0<!--> <!-->mg/dL in the control group), with large individual variation but no significant difference (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27). The average level of HDL cholesterol in CRC group was within normal limits and also did not differ from control (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.60). The average level of TG in CRC patients was slightly lower than in the control group: 127.2<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->58.5<!--> <!-->mg/dl vs 144.6<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->80.8<!--> <!-->mg/dL (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.07). The average level of glucose did not differ in patients with CRC and in control: 5.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->1,2<!--> <!-->mmol/l vs 6.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2.1<!--> <!-->mmol/L (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.40). In patients with CRC systolic blood pressure was significantly lower than in control group: 142.1<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->21.3<!--> <!-->mmHg vs 150.4<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->23.7<!--> <!-->mmHg (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005). The level of diastolic blood pressure was slightly lower than in the control group compared to CRC (88.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->11.2<!--> <!-->mmHg vs91.9<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->13.4<!--> <!-->mmHg, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.06). The proportions of patients with low HDL cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia did not differ between the studied groups, but proportion of hypertension among controls was higher compared to the patients with CRC (85.3% vs 69.6% <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In studied sample, we did not found the differences in the values of anthropometric indicators of metabolic syndrome, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose between patients with colorectal cancer and control. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as hypertension frequency were significantly lower in CRC group than in the control group. Further analysis including stage and localization of CRC is required.</p><p><em>The HAPIEE project is supported by Wellcome Trust (WT081081AIA).</em></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejc Supplements\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 39-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejc Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359634915000713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejc Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359634915000713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖与代谢综合征相关,被认为是结直肠癌(CRC)的重要危险因素。目的采用嵌套“病例-对照”设计,比较结直肠癌患者和对照组代谢综合征(MS)成分的水平。材料与方法本研究在流行病学研究、HAPIEE项目和CRC登记数据库的基础上进行比较。在HAPIEE项目中检查的,根据癌症登记在10年随访期间发生结直肠癌的患者(n = 92,男48,女44,平均年龄60.7 + 6.9岁)被纳入分析。对照组,按性别和年龄匹配,也从HAPIEE数据库组成(n = 184,男性96,女性88,平均年龄60.7 + 6.8岁)。我们根据NCEP ATP - III(2001)使用MS标准。采用SPSS 13.0统计软件对数据进行处理。结果各研究组体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)差异无统计学意义,CRC组BMI平均值为28.6 + 5.3 kg/m2,对照组为28.4 + 5.6 kg/m2 (p = 0.70); CRC组WC平均值为94.1 + 11.7 cm,对照组为94.1 + 13.6 cm (p = 0.90)。结直肠癌患者腹部肥胖比例为41.3%,对照组为42.9% (p = 0.70)。两组总胆固醇平均值均高(结直肠癌患者246.8 + 52.5 mg/dL,对照组239.8 + 47.0 mg/dL),个体差异较大,但无显著性差异(p = 0.27)。CRC组高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的平均水平在正常范围内,与对照组无差异(p = 0.60)。结直肠癌患者的平均TG水平略低于对照组:127.2 + 58.5 mg/dl vs 144.6 + 80.8 mg/dl (p = 0.07)。结直肠癌患者和对照组的平均葡萄糖水平没有差异:5.9 + 1.2 mmol/l vs 6.1 + 2.1 mmol/l (p = 0.40)。结直肠癌患者的收缩压明显低于对照组:142.1 + 21.3 mmHg vs 150.4 + 23.7 mmHg (p = 0.005)。与CRC相比,舒张压水平略低于对照组(88.9 + 11.2 mmHg vs91.9 + 13.4 mmHg, p = 0.06)。低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高甘油三酯血症和高血糖患者的比例在研究组之间没有差异,但对照组中高血压的比例高于结直肠癌患者(85.3% vs 69.6% p = 0.002)。结论在研究样本中,我们未发现结直肠癌患者的代谢综合征、胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯和葡萄糖等人体测量指标与对照组存在差异。结直肠癌组收缩压、舒张压及高血压频率均明显低于对照组。需要进一步的分析,包括CRC的分期和定位。HAPIEE项目由惠康信托基金(WT081081AIA)支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P96

Obesity, associated with metabolic syndrome, is considered a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC).

Purpose

To compare the levels of metabolic syndrome (MS) components in persons with CRC and control in the frame of nested “case-control” design.

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out on the basis of a comparison of databases from epidemiological study The HAPIEE project and CRC register. The patients examined in the HAPIEE project, who had developed CRC during 10-year follow-up period according to the register of cancer (n = 92, men-48, women-44, mean age 60.7 + 6.9 years) were included in analysis. The control group, matched by sex and age, was also formed from the HAPIEE database (n = 184, men-96, women-88, mean age 60.7 + 6.8 years). We used MS criteria’s according to NCEP ATP – III (2001). The data was processed using statistical program SPSS 13.0.

Results

Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) had no significant differences in the studied groups, the average BMI value in CRC group was 28.6 + 5.3 kg/m2 vs 28.4 + 5.6 kg/m2 in control (p = 0.70) and WC value in CRC group was 94.1 + 11.7 cm vs 94.1 + 13.6 cm in control (p = 0.90). The percentage of patients with abdominal obesity was 41.3% in patients with CRC vs 42.9% in the control group (p = 0.70).

The average value of total cholesterol was equally high in both groups (246.8 + 52.5 mg/dL in patients with CRC and 239.8 + 47.0 mg/dL in the control group), with large individual variation but no significant difference (p = 0.27). The average level of HDL cholesterol in CRC group was within normal limits and also did not differ from control (p = 0.60). The average level of TG in CRC patients was slightly lower than in the control group: 127.2 + 58.5 mg/dl vs 144.6 + 80.8 mg/dL (p = 0.07). The average level of glucose did not differ in patients with CRC and in control: 5.9 + 1,2 mmol/l vs 6.1 + 2.1 mmol/L (p = 0.40). In patients with CRC systolic blood pressure was significantly lower than in control group: 142.1 + 21.3 mmHg vs 150.4 + 23.7 mmHg (p = 0.005). The level of diastolic blood pressure was slightly lower than in the control group compared to CRC (88.9 + 11.2 mmHg vs91.9 + 13.4 mmHg, p = 0.06). The proportions of patients with low HDL cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia did not differ between the studied groups, but proportion of hypertension among controls was higher compared to the patients with CRC (85.3% vs 69.6% p = 0.002).

Conclusions

In studied sample, we did not found the differences in the values of anthropometric indicators of metabolic syndrome, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose between patients with colorectal cancer and control. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as hypertension frequency were significantly lower in CRC group than in the control group. Further analysis including stage and localization of CRC is required.

The HAPIEE project is supported by Wellcome Trust (WT081081AIA).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejc Supplements
Ejc Supplements 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: EJC Supplements is an open access companion journal to the European Journal of Cancer. As an open access journal, all published articles are subject to an Article Publication Fee. Immediately upon publication, all articles in EJC Supplements are made openly available through the journal''s websites. EJC Supplements will consider for publication the proceedings of scientific symposia, commissioned thematic issues, and collections of invited articles on preclinical and basic cancer research, translational oncology, clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology and prevention. Authors considering the publication of a supplement in EJC Supplements are requested to contact the Editorial Office of the EJC to discuss their proposal with the Editor-in-Chief. EJC Supplements is an official journal of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the European CanCer Organisation (ECCO) and the European Society of Mastology (EUSOMA).
期刊最新文献
99mTc/123I Dual-Radionuclide Correction for Self-Scatter, Down-Scatter, and Tailing Effect for a CZT SPECT with Varying Tracer Distributions. Pre-COVID-19 Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among Louisiana Medicaid Beneficiaries. The importance of basal-temporal white matter to pre- and post-surgical naming ability in temporal lobe epilepsy. Editorial board Can the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE provide a net benefit for NET patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1