从政治哲学概念的两栖学

Germán Osvaldo Prósperi
{"title":"从政治哲学概念的两栖学","authors":"Germán Osvaldo Prósperi","doi":"10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the author's opinion, ontology, according to Giorgio Agamben, it has been the historical a priori of <em>Homo sapiens</em>, as it has opened the space of human life, from art to politics. However, this solidarity -the author continues- between ontology and politics has led contemporary political philosophy to a dead end. Therefore, proposes an analysis to show some of the difficulties that arise when both concepts are confused.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100493,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Políticos","volume":"39 ","pages":"Pages 13-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De la anfibología de los conceptos de la filosofía política\",\"authors\":\"Germán Osvaldo Prósperi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the author's opinion, ontology, according to Giorgio Agamben, it has been the historical a priori of <em>Homo sapiens</em>, as it has opened the space of human life, from art to politics. However, this solidarity -the author continues- between ontology and politics has led contemporary political philosophy to a dead end. Therefore, proposes an analysis to show some of the difficulties that arise when both concepts are confused.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Políticos\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 13-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.espol.2016.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Políticos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185161616300142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Políticos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185161616300142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在笔者看来,在Giorgio Agamben看来,本体论是智人的历史先验,因为它打开了人类生活的空间,从艺术到政治。然而,本体论与政治之间的这种团结,使当代政治哲学走入了死胡同。因此,提出了一个分析,以显示当两个概念混淆时出现的一些困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De la anfibología de los conceptos de la filosofía política

In the author's opinion, ontology, according to Giorgio Agamben, it has been the historical a priori of Homo sapiens, as it has opened the space of human life, from art to politics. However, this solidarity -the author continues- between ontology and politics has led contemporary political philosophy to a dead end. Therefore, proposes an analysis to show some of the difficulties that arise when both concepts are confused.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La retórica mítica de López Obrador: Grandilocuencia, resentimiento y odio De la sociedad de individuos a la pluralización de la política (segunda parte) Intermarium: el poder oculto de los imperios González Ulloa Aguirre, P. y Cervantes González, O. (Coordinadores). (2023). Categorías políticas de la democracia ante un mundo en cambio. México, UNAM/Gedisa La accesibilidad a los servicios públicos desde la representación política: revisión de literatura en América Latina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1