在三级医院急诊科配药标准化

M.I. Chinchilla Fernández , M. Salazar Bravo , M.A. Calleja Hernández
{"title":"在三级医院急诊科配药标准化","authors":"M.I. Chinchilla Fernández ,&nbsp;M. Salazar Bravo ,&nbsp;M.A. Calleja Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is well-known that there is a lack of continuity in care received from the emergency department, as patients have to visit their physician in order to receive official prescriptions. A programme has been designed that aims to provide these patients with a therapeutic protocol to ensure that they are treated, thus improving coordination between the Hospital Emergency Department and Primary Care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Creating a multidisciplinary team. Choosing the diagnoses that are most common in the emergency department and which are likely to be standardised. Developing treatment protocols, adapting them to the diagnoses selected. Creating a database, collecting, processing and analysing data. Designing satisfaction surveys, for patients given a therapeutic protocol, and for practitioners involved in the programme.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Treatment protocols were assigned to the nine most common diagnoses in the emergency department, with three-day treatment. The selected diagnoses covered 19.5% of the population attending the Emergency Department. A treatment protocol was dispensed to 17.3% of patients with the selected diagnoses. Patient satisfaction was excellent. Physicians approved of the programme, but the treatment protocol prescription did not agree with the degree of approval.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results show that the programme was excellently accepted by both patients and physicians, although the coverage given to the needs identified was lower than required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispensing Standardised Medication in a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department\",\"authors\":\"M.I. Chinchilla Fernández ,&nbsp;M. Salazar Bravo ,&nbsp;M.A. Calleja Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is well-known that there is a lack of continuity in care received from the emergency department, as patients have to visit their physician in order to receive official prescriptions. A programme has been designed that aims to provide these patients with a therapeutic protocol to ensure that they are treated, thus improving coordination between the Hospital Emergency Department and Primary Care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Creating a multidisciplinary team. Choosing the diagnoses that are most common in the emergency department and which are likely to be standardised. Developing treatment protocols, adapting them to the diagnoses selected. Creating a database, collecting, processing and analysing data. Designing satisfaction surveys, for patients given a therapeutic protocol, and for practitioners involved in the programme.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Treatment protocols were assigned to the nine most common diagnoses in the emergency department, with three-day treatment. The selected diagnoses covered 19.5% of the population attending the Emergency Department. A treatment protocol was dispensed to 17.3% of patients with the selected diagnoses. Patient satisfaction was excellent. Physicians approved of the programme, but the treatment protocol prescription did not agree with the degree of approval.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results show that the programme was excellently accepted by both patients and physicians, although the coverage given to the needs identified was lower than required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 106-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言众所周知,从急诊科得到的护理缺乏连续性,因为病人必须去看医生才能得到正式的处方。已经制定了一项方案,旨在为这些病人提供治疗方案,以确保他们得到治疗,从而改善医院急诊科和初级保健之间的协调。方法组建多学科团队。选择在急诊科最常见和可能标准化的诊断。制定治疗方案,使其适应选定的诊断。建立数据库,收集、处理和分析数据。为接受治疗方案的患者和参与方案的从业人员设计满意度调查。结果针对急诊科最常见的9种诊断,采用3天的治疗方案。选定的诊断涵盖了到急诊科就诊的19.5%的人口。17.3%的确诊患者采用了治疗方案。病人的满意度非常高。医师认可该方案,但治疗方案处方的认可程度不一致。结论结果表明,尽管对确定的需求的覆盖率低于要求,但该方案得到了患者和医生的良好接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dispensing Standardised Medication in a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department

Introduction

It is well-known that there is a lack of continuity in care received from the emergency department, as patients have to visit their physician in order to receive official prescriptions. A programme has been designed that aims to provide these patients with a therapeutic protocol to ensure that they are treated, thus improving coordination between the Hospital Emergency Department and Primary Care.

Methods

Creating a multidisciplinary team. Choosing the diagnoses that are most common in the emergency department and which are likely to be standardised. Developing treatment protocols, adapting them to the diagnoses selected. Creating a database, collecting, processing and analysing data. Designing satisfaction surveys, for patients given a therapeutic protocol, and for practitioners involved in the programme.

Results

Treatment protocols were assigned to the nine most common diagnoses in the emergency department, with three-day treatment. The selected diagnoses covered 19.5% of the population attending the Emergency Department. A treatment protocol was dispensed to 17.3% of patients with the selected diagnoses. Patient satisfaction was excellent. Physicians approved of the programme, but the treatment protocol prescription did not agree with the degree of approval.

Conclusions

The results show that the programme was excellently accepted by both patients and physicians, although the coverage given to the needs identified was lower than required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1