急诊科家庭药物收集的质量:核对差异

E. Soler-Giner , M. Izuel-Rami , I. Villar-Fernández , J.M. Real Campaña , P. Carrera Lasfuentes , M.J. Rabanaque Hernández
{"title":"急诊科家庭药物收集的质量:核对差异","authors":"E. Soler-Giner ,&nbsp;M. Izuel-Rami ,&nbsp;I. Villar-Fernández ,&nbsp;J.M. Real Campaña ,&nbsp;P. Carrera Lasfuentes ,&nbsp;M.J. Rabanaque Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the study was to assess home medication data collected at the emergency department in a tertiary hospital. It also aimed to identify whether any possible deficiencies in this collection were translated as reconciliation errors on admission, to analyse and classify these data and identify the pharmacological groups involved.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective observational study was carried out which analysed the pharmacotherapeutic data collected at the emergency department. Patients who were admitted to the Pneumology and Internal Medicine wards at the Miguel Servet University Hospital in Zaragoza were included. A list of the home drugs taken before the hospital stay was compiled, assessing whether the quality deficiencies in data collected in the emergency department translated as reconciliation errors at admission. Unjustified discrepancies were considered and classified in line with the criteria of the consensus document on terminology, classification and assessment of the drug reconciliation programmes for 2009.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 136 patients, finding reconciliation errors in 86.8%. The total number of reconciliation errors found was 519. The most frequent types were: omitting a drug, missing dose information, missing administration frequency information. Almost 40% of the reconciliation errors found in the Internal Medicine ward were not resolved, which was double to that of the Pneumology ward. Most discrepancies were found for the Digestive System and Metabolism group (24%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The percentage of patients that experienced reconciliation errors was high (86%), observing an important opportunity to improve at patient admission to the emergency department.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Home Medication Collection in the Emergency Department: Reconciliation Discrepancies\",\"authors\":\"E. Soler-Giner ,&nbsp;M. Izuel-Rami ,&nbsp;I. Villar-Fernández ,&nbsp;J.M. Real Campaña ,&nbsp;P. Carrera Lasfuentes ,&nbsp;M.J. Rabanaque Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the study was to assess home medication data collected at the emergency department in a tertiary hospital. It also aimed to identify whether any possible deficiencies in this collection were translated as reconciliation errors on admission, to analyse and classify these data and identify the pharmacological groups involved.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective observational study was carried out which analysed the pharmacotherapeutic data collected at the emergency department. Patients who were admitted to the Pneumology and Internal Medicine wards at the Miguel Servet University Hospital in Zaragoza were included. A list of the home drugs taken before the hospital stay was compiled, assessing whether the quality deficiencies in data collected in the emergency department translated as reconciliation errors at admission. Unjustified discrepancies were considered and classified in line with the criteria of the consensus document on terminology, classification and assessment of the drug reconciliation programmes for 2009.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 136 patients, finding reconciliation errors in 86.8%. The total number of reconciliation errors found was 519. The most frequent types were: omitting a drug, missing dose information, missing administration frequency information. Almost 40% of the reconciliation errors found in the Internal Medicine ward were not resolved, which was double to that of the Pneumology ward. Most discrepancies were found for the Digestive System and Metabolism group (24%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The percentage of patients that experienced reconciliation errors was high (86%), observing an important opportunity to improve at patient admission to the emergency department.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一家三级医院急诊科收集的家庭用药数据。它还旨在确定该收集中的任何可能的缺陷是否被翻译为入院时的调和错误,分析和分类这些数据并确定所涉及的药理学组。方法采用前瞻性观察性研究,对急诊科收集的药物治疗资料进行分析。在萨拉戈萨的米格尔·塞韦特大学医院的肺部和内科病房住院的病人也包括在内。编制了住院前使用的家庭药物清单,评估急诊科收集的数据的质量缺陷是否转化为入院时的和解错误。根据关于2009年药物和解方案的术语、分类和评估的协商一致文件的标准,审议和分类了不合理的差异。结果纳入136例患者,调和错误发生率为86.8%。发现的对账错误总数为519个。最常见的类型是:遗漏药物、遗漏剂量信息、遗漏给药频率信息。在内科病房发现的和解错误中,有近40%没有得到解决,是肺炎病房的两倍。大多数差异发生在消化系统和代谢组(24%)。结论出现和解错误的患者比例很高(86%),在患者进入急诊科时观察到一个重要的改善机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of Home Medication Collection in the Emergency Department: Reconciliation Discrepancies

Introduction

The objective of the study was to assess home medication data collected at the emergency department in a tertiary hospital. It also aimed to identify whether any possible deficiencies in this collection were translated as reconciliation errors on admission, to analyse and classify these data and identify the pharmacological groups involved.

Methods

A prospective observational study was carried out which analysed the pharmacotherapeutic data collected at the emergency department. Patients who were admitted to the Pneumology and Internal Medicine wards at the Miguel Servet University Hospital in Zaragoza were included. A list of the home drugs taken before the hospital stay was compiled, assessing whether the quality deficiencies in data collected in the emergency department translated as reconciliation errors at admission. Unjustified discrepancies were considered and classified in line with the criteria of the consensus document on terminology, classification and assessment of the drug reconciliation programmes for 2009.

Results

We included 136 patients, finding reconciliation errors in 86.8%. The total number of reconciliation errors found was 519. The most frequent types were: omitting a drug, missing dose information, missing administration frequency information. Almost 40% of the reconciliation errors found in the Internal Medicine ward were not resolved, which was double to that of the Pneumology ward. Most discrepancies were found for the Digestive System and Metabolism group (24%).

Conclusions

The percentage of patients that experienced reconciliation errors was high (86%), observing an important opportunity to improve at patient admission to the emergency department.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1