RA患者UNI 2全腕关节置换术的中期结果令人失望

Martin Chochole
{"title":"RA患者UNI 2全腕关节置换术的中期结果令人失望","authors":"Martin Chochole","doi":"10.1016/j.main.2015.10.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Total wrist arthroplasty attempts to produce a stable, pain free joint. Avoidance of arthrodesis is a strong impetus. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in wrist arthritis were at least as encouraging as were reports with other implants. The five to ten year outcomes showed a 45% revision rate with arthrodesis rate below 10%. Our question was wether results withstand over time.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Between 2002 and 2012, 12 rheumatoid patients all but one female had cementless UNI 2 total wrist arthroplasty - the only implant used by a single surgeon - on 14 wrists, average age of 68, 55 years (range 37–84 y.). Indication was panarthritis of the carpus with Simmen Grade I and II without major bone loss intact tendons without active synovitis or infection. No patient was dependent on walking aids. At follow-up average 6.9 years the only question was on the status of the implant whether radiological and mechanical stable or not. Two patients were lost to follow-up due to death for other medical reasons.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the follow-up 9 wrists or 75% of the surviving got clinically symptomatic with increasing pain, local swelling and radiovolar drift of the carpus. There was in any instance polyethylene wear accentuated on the radius, synovitis and secondary carpal tunnel syndrome. After an average of 5 years revision rate rose markedly. Radiologic and mechanical loosening of the carpal component was seen 7 times. Surgery - twice there was only the change of the polyethylene component necessary. Three times the carpal component had to be changed in combination with cancellous bone adjunct. Finally, 4 revisions ended in arthrodesis, two of those in first revision. At present, two more patients with three implants are due to reoperation. Thus, arthroplasty showed complication in 75% and mobility was lost in 33% of the surviving.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Early results of the universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in rheumatoid arthritis were encouraging. Midterm results show an array of problems focussing on the carpal component. These studies generally sum up degenerative, posttraumatic and rheumatoid arthritis cases. To our knowledge ours is the only focusing on RA patients only.</p><p>The majority of publications delude oneself to believe in total wrist arthroplasty in this category of patients. The authors own experience is much more deceiving. In our department total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients is no longer the treatment of choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50699,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie De La Main","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 354-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.main.2015.10.065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disillusioning midterm results after UNI 2 total wrist arthroplasty in RA Patients\",\"authors\":\"Martin Chochole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.main.2015.10.065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Total wrist arthroplasty attempts to produce a stable, pain free joint. Avoidance of arthrodesis is a strong impetus. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in wrist arthritis were at least as encouraging as were reports with other implants. The five to ten year outcomes showed a 45% revision rate with arthrodesis rate below 10%. Our question was wether results withstand over time.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Between 2002 and 2012, 12 rheumatoid patients all but one female had cementless UNI 2 total wrist arthroplasty - the only implant used by a single surgeon - on 14 wrists, average age of 68, 55 years (range 37–84 y.). Indication was panarthritis of the carpus with Simmen Grade I and II without major bone loss intact tendons without active synovitis or infection. No patient was dependent on walking aids. At follow-up average 6.9 years the only question was on the status of the implant whether radiological and mechanical stable or not. Two patients were lost to follow-up due to death for other medical reasons.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the follow-up 9 wrists or 75% of the surviving got clinically symptomatic with increasing pain, local swelling and radiovolar drift of the carpus. There was in any instance polyethylene wear accentuated on the radius, synovitis and secondary carpal tunnel syndrome. After an average of 5 years revision rate rose markedly. Radiologic and mechanical loosening of the carpal component was seen 7 times. Surgery - twice there was only the change of the polyethylene component necessary. Three times the carpal component had to be changed in combination with cancellous bone adjunct. Finally, 4 revisions ended in arthrodesis, two of those in first revision. At present, two more patients with three implants are due to reoperation. Thus, arthroplasty showed complication in 75% and mobility was lost in 33% of the surviving.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Early results of the universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in rheumatoid arthritis were encouraging. Midterm results show an array of problems focussing on the carpal component. These studies generally sum up degenerative, posttraumatic and rheumatoid arthritis cases. To our knowledge ours is the only focusing on RA patients only.</p><p>The majority of publications delude oneself to believe in total wrist arthroplasty in this category of patients. The authors own experience is much more deceiving. In our department total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients is no longer the treatment of choice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie De La Main\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 354-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.main.2015.10.065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie De La Main\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297320315002206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie De La Main","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297320315002206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全腕关节置换术的目的是创造一个稳定、无疼痛的关节。避免关节融合术是一个强有力的推动力。通用全腕部关节置换术治疗腕部关节炎的早期结果至少与其他植入物一样令人鼓舞。5 - 10年的结果显示翻修率为45%,关节融合率低于10%。我们的问题是结果是否经得起时间的考验。材料和方法2002年至2012年间,12例类风湿患者(除1例女性外,其余均为女性)在14个手腕上进行了无骨水泥UNI 2全腕关节置换术,这是单一外科医生使用的唯一植入物,平均年龄为68.55岁(37-84岁)。适应症为腕骨全身性关节炎,伴Simmen I级和II级,无严重骨质流失,肌腱完整,无活动性滑膜炎或感染。没有病人依赖助行器。在平均6.9年的随访中,唯一的问题是植入物的状态,放射学和力学是否稳定。2例患者因其他医疗原因死亡,无法随访。结果随访期间,9例患者(75%)出现疼痛加重、局部肿胀、腕骨桡侧漂移等临床症状。在任何情况下,聚乙烯磨损加重了桡骨,滑膜炎和继发性腕管综合征。平均5年后修正率明显上升。腕部放射学和机械松动7次。手术-两次只需要改变聚乙烯成分。三次腕骨组件必须与松质骨附件一起改变。最后,4例翻修结束于关节融合术,其中2例为首次翻修。目前,还有两名植入三颗植入物的患者将进行再次手术。因此,75%的存活患者出现并发症,33%的存活患者丧失活动能力。讨论类风湿性关节炎普遍全腕关节置换术的早期结果令人鼓舞。中期检查结果显示一系列问题集中在腕关节部位。这些研究一般总结了退行性、创伤后和类风湿关节炎病例。据我们所知,我们是唯一专注于类风湿性关节炎患者的。大多数出版物自欺欺人地相信在这类患者中全腕部关节置换术。作者自己的经历更具欺骗性。在我科,全腕关节置换术已不再是类风湿患者的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disillusioning midterm results after UNI 2 total wrist arthroplasty in RA Patients

Total wrist arthroplasty attempts to produce a stable, pain free joint. Avoidance of arthrodesis is a strong impetus. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in wrist arthritis were at least as encouraging as were reports with other implants. The five to ten year outcomes showed a 45% revision rate with arthrodesis rate below 10%. Our question was wether results withstand over time.

Material and method

Between 2002 and 2012, 12 rheumatoid patients all but one female had cementless UNI 2 total wrist arthroplasty - the only implant used by a single surgeon - on 14 wrists, average age of 68, 55 years (range 37–84 y.). Indication was panarthritis of the carpus with Simmen Grade I and II without major bone loss intact tendons without active synovitis or infection. No patient was dependent on walking aids. At follow-up average 6.9 years the only question was on the status of the implant whether radiological and mechanical stable or not. Two patients were lost to follow-up due to death for other medical reasons.

Results

During the follow-up 9 wrists or 75% of the surviving got clinically symptomatic with increasing pain, local swelling and radiovolar drift of the carpus. There was in any instance polyethylene wear accentuated on the radius, synovitis and secondary carpal tunnel syndrome. After an average of 5 years revision rate rose markedly. Radiologic and mechanical loosening of the carpal component was seen 7 times. Surgery - twice there was only the change of the polyethylene component necessary. Three times the carpal component had to be changed in combination with cancellous bone adjunct. Finally, 4 revisions ended in arthrodesis, two of those in first revision. At present, two more patients with three implants are due to reoperation. Thus, arthroplasty showed complication in 75% and mobility was lost in 33% of the surviving.

Discussion

Early results of the universal total wrist arthroplasty KMIy in rheumatoid arthritis were encouraging. Midterm results show an array of problems focussing on the carpal component. These studies generally sum up degenerative, posttraumatic and rheumatoid arthritis cases. To our knowledge ours is the only focusing on RA patients only.

The majority of publications delude oneself to believe in total wrist arthroplasty in this category of patients. The authors own experience is much more deceiving. In our department total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients is no longer the treatment of choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgie De La Main
Chirurgie De La Main 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Secondary mobilization of the first dorsal metacarpal artery flap for first web space reconstruction in a child: A case report Complications after microdermal piercing in the hand: Report of two cases Arthroscopic interposition in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A series of 26 cases Is ORIF actually better than the indirect fixation for treating intra-articular fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1