兽医疫苗许可后安全测试:当前监管要求和可接受替代方案概述

Glen Gifford, Pawan Agrawal, Donna Hutchings, Oksana Yarosh
{"title":"兽医疫苗许可后安全测试:当前监管要求和可接受替代方案概述","authors":"Glen Gifford,&nbsp;Pawan Agrawal,&nbsp;Donna Hutchings,&nbsp;Oksana Yarosh","doi":"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manufacturers of veterinary vaccines frequently incorporate animal-based batch release safety tests into their quality assurance monitoring protocols to meet their internal quality standards and to conform to government regulatory requirements. These tests are conducted by vaccinating target species animals or laboratory animals with a single dose or multiple doses of the test batch, and observing the vaccinated animals for signs of local or systemic adverse reactions. Manufacturers, standard-setting bodies, animal welfare advocacy groups, and regulatory agencies are actively investigating alternative methods to reduce their reliance on animal-based methods for batch release safety testing. Approaches which have been implemented or proposed include harmonizing technical requirements, developing <em>in vitro</em> tests, refining the existing animal tests, improving adverse reaction monitoring (vaccinovigilance), and improving manufacturing methods and quality controls to reduce batch-to-batch variability. An approach, known as the consistency approach, is increasingly being acknowledged as a potentially viable alternative to animal-based batch release tests for vaccines. This paper will provide an overview of currently utilized batch release safety tests for veterinary vaccines, the associated regulatory requirements, and some potentially acceptable alternative approaches for reducing, refining, and replacing the use of animals in these tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89221,"journal":{"name":"Procedia in vaccinology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 236-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.025","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterinary vaccine post-licensing safety testing: overview of current regulatory requirements and accepted alternatives\",\"authors\":\"Glen Gifford,&nbsp;Pawan Agrawal,&nbsp;Donna Hutchings,&nbsp;Oksana Yarosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Manufacturers of veterinary vaccines frequently incorporate animal-based batch release safety tests into their quality assurance monitoring protocols to meet their internal quality standards and to conform to government regulatory requirements. These tests are conducted by vaccinating target species animals or laboratory animals with a single dose or multiple doses of the test batch, and observing the vaccinated animals for signs of local or systemic adverse reactions. Manufacturers, standard-setting bodies, animal welfare advocacy groups, and regulatory agencies are actively investigating alternative methods to reduce their reliance on animal-based methods for batch release safety testing. Approaches which have been implemented or proposed include harmonizing technical requirements, developing <em>in vitro</em> tests, refining the existing animal tests, improving adverse reaction monitoring (vaccinovigilance), and improving manufacturing methods and quality controls to reduce batch-to-batch variability. An approach, known as the consistency approach, is increasingly being acknowledged as a potentially viable alternative to animal-based batch release tests for vaccines. This paper will provide an overview of currently utilized batch release safety tests for veterinary vaccines, the associated regulatory requirements, and some potentially acceptable alternative approaches for reducing, refining, and replacing the use of animals in these tests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 236-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.025\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia in vaccinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

兽医疫苗制造商经常将基于动物的批量释放安全测试纳入其质量保证监测方案,以满足其内部质量标准并符合政府监管要求。这些试验是通过给靶种动物或实验动物接种单剂或多剂试验批次疫苗,并观察接种疫苗的动物是否有局部或全身不良反应的迹象来进行的。制造商、标准制定机构、动物福利倡导团体和监管机构正在积极研究替代方法,以减少他们对动物为基础的批量释放安全测试方法的依赖。已经实施或提议的方法包括协调技术要求、开发体外试验、改进现有动物试验、改进不良反应监测(疫苗警戒)以及改进生产方法和质量控制以减少批次间的差异。一种被称为一致性方法的方法越来越被认为是一种潜在可行的替代方法,可以替代基于动物的疫苗批量释放试验。本文将概述目前用于兽医疫苗的批量释放安全性测试,相关的监管要求,以及一些可能可接受的替代方法,以减少、改进和取代在这些测试中使用动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Veterinary vaccine post-licensing safety testing: overview of current regulatory requirements and accepted alternatives

Manufacturers of veterinary vaccines frequently incorporate animal-based batch release safety tests into their quality assurance monitoring protocols to meet their internal quality standards and to conform to government regulatory requirements. These tests are conducted by vaccinating target species animals or laboratory animals with a single dose or multiple doses of the test batch, and observing the vaccinated animals for signs of local or systemic adverse reactions. Manufacturers, standard-setting bodies, animal welfare advocacy groups, and regulatory agencies are actively investigating alternative methods to reduce their reliance on animal-based methods for batch release safety testing. Approaches which have been implemented or proposed include harmonizing technical requirements, developing in vitro tests, refining the existing animal tests, improving adverse reaction monitoring (vaccinovigilance), and improving manufacturing methods and quality controls to reduce batch-to-batch variability. An approach, known as the consistency approach, is increasingly being acknowledged as a potentially viable alternative to animal-based batch release tests for vaccines. This paper will provide an overview of currently utilized batch release safety tests for veterinary vaccines, the associated regulatory requirements, and some potentially acceptable alternative approaches for reducing, refining, and replacing the use of animals in these tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Production and Characterization of Human Monoclonal Antibodies from the Cells of A(H1N1)pdm2009 Influenza Virus Infected Indian Donors Editorial: Preventive Vaccination Stabilization of Outer Domain of gp120 from HIV-1 Subtype C for Vaccine Immunogen Design Haloarchaeal Gas Vesicle Nanoparticles Displaying Salmonella Antigens as a Novel Approach to Vaccine Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1