巴西风湿病学家形成的演变:住院医师的选择

Cleandro Pires Albuquerque, Leopoldo Luiz Santos‐Neto
{"title":"巴西风湿病学家形成的演变:住院医师的选择","authors":"Cleandro Pires Albuquerque,&nbsp;Leopoldo Luiz Santos‐Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the characteristics and progression of the supply of new rheumatologists in Brazil, from 2000 to 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consultations to databases and official documents of institutions related to training and certification of rheumatologists in Brazil took place. The data were compared, summarized and presented descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2000 to 2015, Brazil qualified 1091 physicians as rheumatologists, of which 76.9% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->839) completed a medical residency program in rheumatology (MRPR); the others (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->252) achieved this title without MRPR training. There was an expansion of MRPR positions. At the same time, there was a change in the profile of the newly qualified doctors. Early in the series, the fraction of new rheumatologists without MRPR, entering the market annually, was approaching 50%, dropping to about 15% in recent years. In 2015, Brazil offered 49 MRPR accredited programs, with 120 positions per year for access. There was an imbalance in the distribution of MRPR positions across the country, with a strong concentration in the southeast region, which in 2015 held 59.2% of the positions. Public institutions accounted for 94% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->789) of graduates in MRPR during the study period, while still maintaining 93.3% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->112) of seats for admission in 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the last sixteen years, in parallel with the expansion of places of access, MRPR has established itself as the preferred route for rheumatology training in Brazil, mainly supported by public funds. Regional inequalities in the provision of MRPR positions still persist, as challenges that must be faced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.03.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolução da formação de reumatologistas no Brasil: a opção pela residência médica\",\"authors\":\"Cleandro Pires Albuquerque,&nbsp;Leopoldo Luiz Santos‐Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the characteristics and progression of the supply of new rheumatologists in Brazil, from 2000 to 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consultations to databases and official documents of institutions related to training and certification of rheumatologists in Brazil took place. The data were compared, summarized and presented descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2000 to 2015, Brazil qualified 1091 physicians as rheumatologists, of which 76.9% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->839) completed a medical residency program in rheumatology (MRPR); the others (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->252) achieved this title without MRPR training. There was an expansion of MRPR positions. At the same time, there was a change in the profile of the newly qualified doctors. Early in the series, the fraction of new rheumatologists without MRPR, entering the market annually, was approaching 50%, dropping to about 15% in recent years. In 2015, Brazil offered 49 MRPR accredited programs, with 120 positions per year for access. There was an imbalance in the distribution of MRPR positions across the country, with a strong concentration in the southeast region, which in 2015 held 59.2% of the positions. Public institutions accounted for 94% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->789) of graduates in MRPR during the study period, while still maintaining 93.3% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->112) of seats for admission in 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the last sixteen years, in parallel with the expansion of places of access, MRPR has established itself as the preferred route for rheumatology training in Brazil, mainly supported by public funds. Regional inequalities in the provision of MRPR positions still persist, as challenges that must be faced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的分析2000 - 2015年巴西风湿病专科医生新增供应的特点和发展趋势。方法查阅巴西风湿病学家培训和认证相关机构的数据库和官方文件。对数据进行比较、总结和描述。结果2000 - 2015年,巴西共有1091名医生获得风湿病医师资格,其中76.9% (n = 839)完成了风湿病住院医师培训(MRPR);其他人(n = 252)在没有MRPR培训的情况下获得了这个头衔。MRPR职位有所增加。与此同时,新获得资格的医生的形象也发生了变化。在该系列的早期,每年进入市场的新风湿病学家中没有MRPR的比例接近50%,近年来降至15%左右。2015年,巴西提供了49个MRPR认证项目,每年提供120个职位。MRPR职位在全国范围内分布不平衡,东南地区集中度较强,2015年占比59.2%。在研究期间,MRPR毕业生中,公立院校占94% (n = 789), 2015年仍保持93.3% (n = 112)的招生名额。结论在过去的16年里,随着可及场所的扩大,MRPR已成为巴西风湿病学培训的首选途径,主要由公共资金支持。提供MRPR职位方面的区域不平等仍然存在,这是必须面对的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evolução da formação de reumatologistas no Brasil: a opção pela residência médica

Objective

To describe the characteristics and progression of the supply of new rheumatologists in Brazil, from 2000 to 2015.

Methods

Consultations to databases and official documents of institutions related to training and certification of rheumatologists in Brazil took place. The data were compared, summarized and presented descriptively.

Results

From 2000 to 2015, Brazil qualified 1091 physicians as rheumatologists, of which 76.9% (n = 839) completed a medical residency program in rheumatology (MRPR); the others (n = 252) achieved this title without MRPR training. There was an expansion of MRPR positions. At the same time, there was a change in the profile of the newly qualified doctors. Early in the series, the fraction of new rheumatologists without MRPR, entering the market annually, was approaching 50%, dropping to about 15% in recent years. In 2015, Brazil offered 49 MRPR accredited programs, with 120 positions per year for access. There was an imbalance in the distribution of MRPR positions across the country, with a strong concentration in the southeast region, which in 2015 held 59.2% of the positions. Public institutions accounted for 94% (n = 789) of graduates in MRPR during the study period, while still maintaining 93.3% (n = 112) of seats for admission in 2015.

Conclusions

In the last sixteen years, in parallel with the expansion of places of access, MRPR has established itself as the preferred route for rheumatology training in Brazil, mainly supported by public funds. Regional inequalities in the provision of MRPR positions still persist, as challenges that must be faced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.82
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome nefrótica como a primeira manifestação da esclerodermia sistêmica juvenil Presença de corpos riziformes em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil: relato de caso e revisão de literatura Redução da ativação e do recrutamento de linfócito CD3 com o uso de anticorpo anti‐TNF‐alfa: avaliação da resposta clínica e cintilográfica com 99mTc‐OKT3 em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil Doença de Lyme e artrite idiopática juvenil – Relato de caso clínico pediátrico Anormalidades esofágicas na esclerodermia localizada juvenil: associação com outras manifestações extracutâneas?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1