PET/CT对卵巢癌患者良性和恶性胸膜积液鉴别的贡献

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.remn.2023.03.003
A. Budak , A. Yanarateş , E. Budak
{"title":"PET/CT对卵巢癌患者良性和恶性胸膜积液鉴别的贡献","authors":"A. Budak ,&nbsp;A. Yanarateş ,&nbsp;E. Budak","doi":"10.1016/j.remn.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study investigates the ability of non-invasive contribution of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between benign pleural effusions (BPE) and malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma (OC).</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Included in the study were 32 OC patients with a PE diagnosis. The cases with BPE and MPE were compared in terms of the PE maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), PE SUVmax/mean standardized uptake (SUVmean) value of the mediastinal blood pool (TBRp), the presence of pleural thickening, the presence of supradiaphragmatic lymph node, unilateral or bilateral PE, pleural effusion diameter, patient age and CA125 value.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the 32 patients was 57<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.8 years. TBRp&gt;1.1, pleural thickening and supradiaphragmatic lymph node were observed significantly more frequently in the MPE than the BPE cases. While no pleural nodules were detected in patients with BPE, they were present in 7 of the patients with MPE. The rates of distinction between the MPE and BPE cases were as follows: the sensitivity of the TBRp value was 95.2% and specificity was 72.7%; the sensitivity of pleural thickness was 80.9% and specificity was 81.8%; the sensitivity of supradiaphragmatic lymph node was 38% and specificity was 90.9%; and the sensitivity of the pleural nodule was 33.3% and specificity was 100%. There were no significant differences between two groups in any other factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pleural thickening and TBRp values ascertained through PET/CT may aid the distinction between MPE-BPE, especially in patients with advanced stage OC with a poor general condition, or those who cannot undergo surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48986,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular","volume":"42 6","pages":"Pages 353-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribución de PET/CT a la diferenciación de derrame pleural benigno y maligno en pacientes con cáncer de ovario\",\"authors\":\"A. Budak ,&nbsp;A. Yanarateş ,&nbsp;E. Budak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.remn.2023.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study investigates the ability of non-invasive contribution of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between benign pleural effusions (BPE) and malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma (OC).</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Included in the study were 32 OC patients with a PE diagnosis. The cases with BPE and MPE were compared in terms of the PE maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), PE SUVmax/mean standardized uptake (SUVmean) value of the mediastinal blood pool (TBRp), the presence of pleural thickening, the presence of supradiaphragmatic lymph node, unilateral or bilateral PE, pleural effusion diameter, patient age and CA125 value.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the 32 patients was 57<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.8 years. TBRp&gt;1.1, pleural thickening and supradiaphragmatic lymph node were observed significantly more frequently in the MPE than the BPE cases. While no pleural nodules were detected in patients with BPE, they were present in 7 of the patients with MPE. The rates of distinction between the MPE and BPE cases were as follows: the sensitivity of the TBRp value was 95.2% and specificity was 72.7%; the sensitivity of pleural thickness was 80.9% and specificity was 81.8%; the sensitivity of supradiaphragmatic lymph node was 38% and specificity was 90.9%; and the sensitivity of the pleural nodule was 33.3% and specificity was 100%. There were no significant differences between two groups in any other factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pleural thickening and TBRp values ascertained through PET/CT may aid the distinction between MPE-BPE, especially in patients with advanced stage OC with a poor general condition, or those who cannot undergo surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular\",\"volume\":\"42 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 353-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253654X23000471\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253654X23000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)对卵巢癌(OC)患者良性胸腔积液(BPE)和恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的非侵入性鉴别能力。材料和方法本研究纳入32例经PE诊断的OC患者。比较BPE和MPE患者的PE最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、PE SUVmax/纵膈血池(TBRp)平均标准化摄取值(SUVmean)、胸膜增厚、膈上淋巴结、单侧或双侧PE、胸膜积液直径、患者年龄和CA125值。结果32例患者平均年龄57±2.8岁。TBRp>1.1, MPE患者胸膜增厚和膈上淋巴结明显多于BPE患者。虽然在BPE患者中未发现胸膜结节,但在MPE患者中有7例存在胸膜结节。MPE与BPE的鉴别率为:TBRp值的敏感性为95.2%,特异性为72.7%;胸膜厚度敏感性为80.9%,特异性为81.8%;膈上淋巴结敏感性为38%,特异性为90.9%;胸膜结节的敏感性为33.3%,特异性为100%。两组在其他因素上均无显著差异。结论通过PET/CT检测胸膜增厚和TBRp值有助于MPE-BPE的鉴别,特别是对于一般情况较差的晚期OC患者或不能接受手术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contribución de PET/CT a la diferenciación de derrame pleural benigno y maligno en pacientes con cáncer de ovario

Objective

The present study investigates the ability of non-invasive contribution of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between benign pleural effusions (BPE) and malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma (OC).

Material and method

Included in the study were 32 OC patients with a PE diagnosis. The cases with BPE and MPE were compared in terms of the PE maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), PE SUVmax/mean standardized uptake (SUVmean) value of the mediastinal blood pool (TBRp), the presence of pleural thickening, the presence of supradiaphragmatic lymph node, unilateral or bilateral PE, pleural effusion diameter, patient age and CA125 value.

Results

The mean age of the 32 patients was 57 ± 2.8 years. TBRp>1.1, pleural thickening and supradiaphragmatic lymph node were observed significantly more frequently in the MPE than the BPE cases. While no pleural nodules were detected in patients with BPE, they were present in 7 of the patients with MPE. The rates of distinction between the MPE and BPE cases were as follows: the sensitivity of the TBRp value was 95.2% and specificity was 72.7%; the sensitivity of pleural thickness was 80.9% and specificity was 81.8%; the sensitivity of supradiaphragmatic lymph node was 38% and specificity was 90.9%; and the sensitivity of the pleural nodule was 33.3% and specificity was 100%. There were no significant differences between two groups in any other factors.

Conclusion

Pleural thickening and TBRp values ascertained through PET/CT may aid the distinction between MPE-BPE, especially in patients with advanced stage OC with a poor general condition, or those who cannot undergo surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular
Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (Spanish Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging), was founded in 1982, and is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, which has more than 700 members. The Journal, which publishes 6 regular issues per year, has the promotion of research and continuing education in all fields of Nuclear Medicine as its main aim. For this, its principal sections are Originals, Clinical Notes, Images of Interest, and Special Collaboration articles.
期刊最新文献
PET/RM cardiovascular con [18F]F-FDG en el diagnóstico de miocardiopatía aguda inflamatoria Radiosinoviortesis con [90Y] citrato de ytrio en la sinovitis refractaria de rodilla: experiencia de 2 hospitales de referencia Heterogeneidad del tumor primario en la PET/TC con [68Ga]Ga-PSMA previa al tratamiento para la predicción de la recurrencia bioquímica en el cáncer de próstata Asociación entre las imágenes SPECT/CT con 99mTc-PSMA y los niveles de antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y fosfatasa alcalina (ALP) después de la terapia endocrina en pacientes con cáncer de próstata y metástasis óseas Terapia de ablación con yodo radiactivo de baja dosis (1,11 GBq) para el cáncer de tiroides diferenciado en el oeste de Turquía
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1