赤脚和极简跑步:目前对证据的理解

Craig Payne
{"title":"赤脚和极简跑步:目前对证据的理解","authors":"Craig Payne","doi":"10.1016/j.repod.2016.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Barefoot running and minimalist running have gained considerable popularity in the last years in the running community. This popularity has been achieved by bookseller Born to Run, some specific scientific publications, main stream media coverage and websites devoted to the benefits of barefoot running. However, in the last years, much more evidence has been produced in this topic. This article summarizes the current evidence available on barefoot versus shod running at three different aspects of running: economy running, biomechanical differences and injury rates between both trends. The available current evidence about barefoot or minimalist running versus shod running suggests that there are no systematic benefits of one over the other in any of three different aspects reviewed. Clearly, it seems that the theoretical benefits attributed to barefoot and minimalist running are not supported by the current evidence available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33239,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Podologia","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages e1-e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repod.2016.05.008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barefoot and minimalist running: The current understanding of the evidence\",\"authors\":\"Craig Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.repod.2016.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Barefoot running and minimalist running have gained considerable popularity in the last years in the running community. This popularity has been achieved by bookseller Born to Run, some specific scientific publications, main stream media coverage and websites devoted to the benefits of barefoot running. However, in the last years, much more evidence has been produced in this topic. This article summarizes the current evidence available on barefoot versus shod running at three different aspects of running: economy running, biomechanical differences and injury rates between both trends. The available current evidence about barefoot or minimalist running versus shod running suggests that there are no systematic benefits of one over the other in any of three different aspects reviewed. Clearly, it seems that the theoretical benefits attributed to barefoot and minimalist running are not supported by the current evidence available.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Podologia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e1-e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repod.2016.05.008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Podologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021012381630010X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Podologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021012381630010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

赤脚跑步和极简跑步在过去的几年里在跑步界获得了相当大的人气。这种流行是由书商“为跑步而生”、一些特定的科学出版物、主流媒体报道和致力于赤脚跑步好处的网站实现的。然而,在过去的几年里,在这个话题上产生了更多的证据。这篇文章总结了目前关于赤脚跑步和穿鞋跑步三个不同方面的证据:经济性跑步,两种趋势之间的生物力学差异和受伤率。现有的关于赤脚跑步或极少跑步与穿鞋跑步的证据表明,在三个不同的方面,没有一个比另一个有系统的好处。显然,赤脚跑步和极简跑步的理论好处似乎并没有得到现有证据的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barefoot and minimalist running: The current understanding of the evidence

Barefoot running and minimalist running have gained considerable popularity in the last years in the running community. This popularity has been achieved by bookseller Born to Run, some specific scientific publications, main stream media coverage and websites devoted to the benefits of barefoot running. However, in the last years, much more evidence has been produced in this topic. This article summarizes the current evidence available on barefoot versus shod running at three different aspects of running: economy running, biomechanical differences and injury rates between both trends. The available current evidence about barefoot or minimalist running versus shod running suggests that there are no systematic benefits of one over the other in any of three different aspects reviewed. Clearly, it seems that the theoretical benefits attributed to barefoot and minimalist running are not supported by the current evidence available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Réplica a la carta al Editor en la Revista Española de Podología al artículo «Evaluación de la calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de artritis reumatoide con recomendaciones sobre la salud del pie» Las cartas al Editor Results of the weight-bearing Lunge test on patients with functional hallux limitus: A cross sectional case–control study Complications associated with the negative pressure therapy in the treatment of the diabetic foot ulcers: Retrospective case series Complicaciones asociadas a la terapia de presión negativa en el tratamiento de las úlceras de pie diabético: serie de casos retrospectiva
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1