医生接受建议为患者提供改善药物治疗的机会

M.A. López-Montenegro Soria , M. Climente Martí , N.V. Jiménez Torres
{"title":"医生接受建议为患者提供改善药物治疗的机会","authors":"M.A. López-Montenegro Soria ,&nbsp;M. Climente Martí ,&nbsp;N.V. Jiménez Torres","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).</p><p>The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm<sup>®</sup> Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).</p><p>We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctors’ acceptance of recommendations for patients with the opportunity for pharmacotherapy improvement\",\"authors\":\"M.A. López-Montenegro Soria ,&nbsp;M. Climente Martí ,&nbsp;N.V. Jiménez Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).</p><p>The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm<sup>®</sup> Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).</p><p>We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的确定并量化不同变量对住院患者实施药物治疗优化措施的影响。方法描述性横向研究。期:2000 - 2007。环境:公立大学总医院(每年收治25000名患者)。为提高药物治疗质量和患者安全而实施的方案覆盖了所有患者的30%。使用Atefarm®Farmis应用程序的记录,我们分析了药剂师向医生提出的药物治疗建议(pr)。选择的变量如下:ADE的用药风险(1-高,0-低),ADE类别(0指征,1-有效性,2-安全性),潜在严重程度(1- 5级),PR的影响(0-有效性,1-安全性,2-有效性)和PR的实施(是/否)。我们计算了分类变量的频率(%)和95% CI,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定变量对实施pr的影响程度。结果4680例患者中发现7920例ade。85%的病例(6762例)发放了PR, 83%的患者实施了PR (95% CI 74.2-89.8)。ADE的潜在严重程度≥2 (OR 1.57;95% CI 1.27-1.94), ADE分类的有效性和安全性(OR 1.19;95% CI 1.02-1.39)是患者实施PR的决定因素。结论患者实施PR的可能性与潜在的严重程度和已确定的ADE的类别有关。因此,旨在提高药物治疗有效性或患者安全性的建议以及具有潜在临床后果的建议更有可能应用于患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doctors’ acceptance of recommendations for patients with the opportunity for pharmacotherapy improvement

Objective

To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.

Method

Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).

The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm® Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).

We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.

Results

We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.

Conclusions

The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1