心脏移植患者和解与信息方案的评估

J. Hernández Martín , M. Montero Hernández , I. Font Noguera , L. Doménech Moral , V. Merino Sanjuán , J.L. Poveda Andrés
{"title":"心脏移植患者和解与信息方案的评估","authors":"J. Hernández Martín ,&nbsp;M. Montero Hernández ,&nbsp;I. Font Noguera ,&nbsp;L. Doménech Moral ,&nbsp;V. Merino Sanjuán ,&nbsp;J.L. Poveda Andrés","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70058-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective is to assess a pharmaceutical care programme for heart transplant patients upon patient admission and discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Observational study of heart transplant patients, performed during the first quarter of 2007. Upon admission, the patient was interviewed regarding home treatments, adherence, allergies, and adverse effects, his/her prescriptions were compared with the last discharge report (drug reconciliation). At time of discharge, treatment was checked against the last hospital prescription (reconciliation) and an informative report was drawn up and personally delivered to the patient. Subsequently, a satisfaction questionnaire was carried out by telephone. Drug-related problems were recorded using Atefarm® software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The programme was applied to 24 patients upon admission and 23 upon discharge. No drug interactions were detected. Treatment adherence was higher than 90%. 37.5% of patients informed of an adverse reaction. Medication-related problems were identified in 16 patients (45.7%) for 6.6% of medications, most of which (38%) were for infection prophylaxis; medication omission was the most frequently-detected error. Positive evaluation of the information that was received was higher than 90%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up upon admission and discharge resolves and prevents problems while improving patienti nformedness and satisfaction. Limitations on personnel prevent the population's requests from being met.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70058-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of a reconciliation and information programme for heart transplant patients\",\"authors\":\"J. Hernández Martín ,&nbsp;M. Montero Hernández ,&nbsp;I. Font Noguera ,&nbsp;L. Doménech Moral ,&nbsp;V. Merino Sanjuán ,&nbsp;J.L. Poveda Andrés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70058-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The objective is to assess a pharmaceutical care programme for heart transplant patients upon patient admission and discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Observational study of heart transplant patients, performed during the first quarter of 2007. Upon admission, the patient was interviewed regarding home treatments, adherence, allergies, and adverse effects, his/her prescriptions were compared with the last discharge report (drug reconciliation). At time of discharge, treatment was checked against the last hospital prescription (reconciliation) and an informative report was drawn up and personally delivered to the patient. Subsequently, a satisfaction questionnaire was carried out by telephone. Drug-related problems were recorded using Atefarm® software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The programme was applied to 24 patients upon admission and 23 upon discharge. No drug interactions were detected. Treatment adherence was higher than 90%. 37.5% of patients informed of an adverse reaction. Medication-related problems were identified in 16 patients (45.7%) for 6.6% of medications, most of which (38%) were for infection prophylaxis; medication omission was the most frequently-detected error. Positive evaluation of the information that was received was higher than 90%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up upon admission and discharge resolves and prevents problems while improving patienti nformedness and satisfaction. Limitations on personnel prevent the population's requests from being met.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70058-7\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508510700587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508510700587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的是评估心脏移植患者入院和出院时的药物护理方案。材料和方法2007年第一季度对心脏移植患者进行的观察性研究。入院时,对患者进行了关于家庭治疗、依从性、过敏和不良反应的访谈,并将其处方与上次出院报告(药物核对)进行了比较。出院时,根据最后的医院处方(核对)检查治疗情况,并起草一份资料报告,亲自交给病人。随后,通过电话进行了满意度问卷调查。使用Atefarm®软件记录与药物有关的问题。结果24例患者入院时应用该方案,出院时应用该方案23例。未发现药物相互作用。治疗依从性高于90%。37.5%的患者报告有不良反应。16例患者(45.7%)对6.6%的药物存在药物相关问题,其中大部分(38%)用于预防感染;漏药是最常发现的错误。收到的信息的正面评价高于90%。结论入院和出院时的药物治疗随访在提高患者知情程度和满意度的同时,解决和预防了问题。对人员的限制使人们的要求得不到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of a reconciliation and information programme for heart transplant patients

Introduction

The objective is to assess a pharmaceutical care programme for heart transplant patients upon patient admission and discharge.

Material and methods

Observational study of heart transplant patients, performed during the first quarter of 2007. Upon admission, the patient was interviewed regarding home treatments, adherence, allergies, and adverse effects, his/her prescriptions were compared with the last discharge report (drug reconciliation). At time of discharge, treatment was checked against the last hospital prescription (reconciliation) and an informative report was drawn up and personally delivered to the patient. Subsequently, a satisfaction questionnaire was carried out by telephone. Drug-related problems were recorded using Atefarm® software.

Results

The programme was applied to 24 patients upon admission and 23 upon discharge. No drug interactions were detected. Treatment adherence was higher than 90%. 37.5% of patients informed of an adverse reaction. Medication-related problems were identified in 16 patients (45.7%) for 6.6% of medications, most of which (38%) were for infection prophylaxis; medication omission was the most frequently-detected error. Positive evaluation of the information that was received was higher than 90%.

Conclusions

Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up upon admission and discharge resolves and prevents problems while improving patienti nformedness and satisfaction. Limitations on personnel prevent the population's requests from being met.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1