María Asunción Esteve-Pastor , José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca , Vanessa Roldán , Francisco Marín
{"title":"栓塞、缺血和出血风险","authors":"María Asunción Esteve-Pastor , José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca , Vanessa Roldán , Francisco Marín","doi":"10.1016/S1131-3587(19)30028-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the general population. Its presence increases the risk of thromboembolic events 5-fold. Although antithrombotic treatment reduces this risk, in contrast it increases the potential risk of bleeding, with intracranial hemorrhage being the most feared complication. However, not all patients have the same risk. Consequently, a number of different thromboembolic riskscores have been developed in recent years (e.g. the CHADS<sub>2</sub>, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and ATRIA stroke risk scores). The CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score is the one recommended by clinical practice guidelines for optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. These same clinical guidelines recommend that both bleeding and thromboembolic risk should be assessed and various risk scores have been proposed for assessing hemorrhagic risk (e.g. the HEMORR<sub>2</sub>HAGES, HAS-BLED, ATRIA bleeding risk and ORBIT-AF scores). Currently, however, none has been explicitly recommended in European guidelines. It is vital that the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy is assessed to ensure that the expected advantages of anticoagulation treatment outweigh the harm that could be caused by potential hemorrhages.</p><p>Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34926,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riesgo embólico, riesgo isquémico y riesgo hemorrágico\",\"authors\":\"María Asunción Esteve-Pastor , José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca , Vanessa Roldán , Francisco Marín\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1131-3587(19)30028-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the general population. Its presence increases the risk of thromboembolic events 5-fold. Although antithrombotic treatment reduces this risk, in contrast it increases the potential risk of bleeding, with intracranial hemorrhage being the most feared complication. However, not all patients have the same risk. Consequently, a number of different thromboembolic riskscores have been developed in recent years (e.g. the CHADS<sub>2</sub>, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and ATRIA stroke risk scores). The CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score is the one recommended by clinical practice guidelines for optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. These same clinical guidelines recommend that both bleeding and thromboembolic risk should be assessed and various risk scores have been proposed for assessing hemorrhagic risk (e.g. the HEMORR<sub>2</sub>HAGES, HAS-BLED, ATRIA bleeding risk and ORBIT-AF scores). Currently, however, none has been explicitly recommended in European guidelines. It is vital that the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy is assessed to ensure that the expected advantages of anticoagulation treatment outweigh the harm that could be caused by potential hemorrhages.</p><p>Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1131358719300287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1131358719300287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Riesgo embólico, riesgo isquémico y riesgo hemorrágico
Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the general population. Its presence increases the risk of thromboembolic events 5-fold. Although antithrombotic treatment reduces this risk, in contrast it increases the potential risk of bleeding, with intracranial hemorrhage being the most feared complication. However, not all patients have the same risk. Consequently, a number of different thromboembolic riskscores have been developed in recent years (e.g. the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA stroke risk scores). The CHA2DS2-VASc score is the one recommended by clinical practice guidelines for optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. These same clinical guidelines recommend that both bleeding and thromboembolic risk should be assessed and various risk scores have been proposed for assessing hemorrhagic risk (e.g. the HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, ATRIA bleeding risk and ORBIT-AF scores). Currently, however, none has been explicitly recommended in European guidelines. It is vital that the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy is assessed to ensure that the expected advantages of anticoagulation treatment outweigh the harm that could be caused by potential hemorrhages.
Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.
期刊介绍:
Revista Española de Cardiología, is an international scientific journal dealing with cardiovascular medicine. Revista Española de Cardiología, the official publication of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, publishes research articles related to cardiovascular diseases. Articles are published in Spanish for the paper edition and in both Spanish and English in the electronic edition, which is available on the Internet. Regular sections include original articles reporting clinical or basic research, brief reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor.