结论和实际建议

Ángel Cequier
{"title":"结论和实际建议","authors":"Ángel Cequier","doi":"10.1016/S1131-3587(19)30033-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with oral anticoagulant drugs to lower their cardioembolic risk. Moreover, if they are to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, they should receive dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis. Therefore, these patients should be treated with both an oral anticoagulant and an antiplatelet agent. This regimen markedly reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, but is associated with a substantial increase in hemorrhagic complications. Reliable information is available on embolic, hemorrhagic and ischemic risks and on the benefit and potential complications of anticoagulation and antiaggregation in different clinical scenarios. However, percutaneous coronary intervention in these patients raises a number of very specific issues. In addition, the recent publications of studies that have evaluated particular direct oral anticoagulants (i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) have provided new information that could significantly alter treatment in these patients. Some of the main topics for debate are whether dual antithrombotic therapy is necessary, whether triple therapy may be preferable, which patients should be treated and for how long, and which antiaggregants should be added. This article highlights the most important evidence-based findings and outlines a number of recommendations, with the aim of identifying the most practical clinical approach in this complex scenario.</p><p>Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34926,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusiones y recomendaciones prácticas\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Cequier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1131-3587(19)30033-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with oral anticoagulant drugs to lower their cardioembolic risk. Moreover, if they are to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, they should receive dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis. Therefore, these patients should be treated with both an oral anticoagulant and an antiplatelet agent. This regimen markedly reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, but is associated with a substantial increase in hemorrhagic complications. Reliable information is available on embolic, hemorrhagic and ischemic risks and on the benefit and potential complications of anticoagulation and antiaggregation in different clinical scenarios. However, percutaneous coronary intervention in these patients raises a number of very specific issues. In addition, the recent publications of studies that have evaluated particular direct oral anticoagulants (i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) have provided new information that could significantly alter treatment in these patients. Some of the main topics for debate are whether dual antithrombotic therapy is necessary, whether triple therapy may be preferable, which patients should be treated and for how long, and which antiaggregants should be added. This article highlights the most important evidence-based findings and outlines a number of recommendations, with the aim of identifying the most practical clinical approach in this complex scenario.</p><p>Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1131358719300330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1131358719300330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

房颤患者应口服抗凝药物治疗,以降低心脏栓塞的风险。此外,如果他们接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,他们应该接受双重抗血小板治疗,以减少支架血栓的发生率。因此,这些患者应同时使用口服抗凝血剂和抗血小板药物。该方案显著降低了血栓栓塞事件的风险,但与出血性并发症的大幅增加有关。关于栓塞、出血和缺血风险以及抗凝和抗聚集在不同临床情况下的益处和潜在并发症的可靠信息是可用的。然而,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对这些患者提出了一些非常具体的问题。此外,最近发表的评估特定直接口服抗凝剂(即利伐沙班、达比加群和阿哌沙班)的研究提供了可能显著改变这些患者治疗的新信息。争论的一些主要话题是双重抗血栓治疗是否必要,三联治疗是否可取,哪些患者应该治疗,治疗多长时间,以及应该添加哪些抗聚集剂。本文强调了最重要的循证发现,并概述了一些建议,旨在确定在这种复杂情况下最实用的临床方法。补充信息:本文是由勃林格殷格翰公司赞助的题为“经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心房颤动患者:最新进展”的补充文章的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conclusiones y recomendaciones prácticas

Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with oral anticoagulant drugs to lower their cardioembolic risk. Moreover, if they are to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, they should receive dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis. Therefore, these patients should be treated with both an oral anticoagulant and an antiplatelet agent. This regimen markedly reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, but is associated with a substantial increase in hemorrhagic complications. Reliable information is available on embolic, hemorrhagic and ischemic risks and on the benefit and potential complications of anticoagulation and antiaggregation in different clinical scenarios. However, percutaneous coronary intervention in these patients raises a number of very specific issues. In addition, the recent publications of studies that have evaluated particular direct oral anticoagulants (i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) have provided new information that could significantly alter treatment in these patients. Some of the main topics for debate are whether dual antithrombotic therapy is necessary, whether triple therapy may be preferable, which patients should be treated and for how long, and which antiaggregants should be added. This article highlights the most important evidence-based findings and outlines a number of recommendations, with the aim of identifying the most practical clinical approach in this complex scenario.

Supplement information: this article is part of a supplement entitled “Treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an update”, which is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos
Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Revista Española de Cardiología, is an international scientific journal dealing with cardiovascular medicine. Revista Española de Cardiología, the official publication of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, publishes research articles related to cardiovascular diseases. Articles are published in Spanish for the paper edition and in both Spanish and English in the electronic edition, which is available on the Internet. Regular sections include original articles reporting clinical or basic research, brief reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Riesgo residual. Conclusiones Consideraciones clínicas y estrategias terapéuticas para reducir el riesgo residual Icosapento de etilo en la disminución del riesgo residual. Nuevas evidencias Recomendaciones actuales de las guías respecto al riesgo residual ¿Qué es el riesgo cardiovascular residual? Etiología, lípidos e inflamación
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1