奥斯曼城镇的社会与政治:17世纪的艾因塔布。莱顿:E.J. Brill, 2007。213页,脚注,表格,附录,参考书目,索引。布US$120.00 ISBN 90-04-15456-6

Linda T. Darling
{"title":"奥斯曼城镇的社会与政治:17世纪的艾因塔布。莱顿:E.J. Brill, 2007。213页,脚注,表格,附录,参考书目,索引。布US$120.00 ISBN 90-04-15456-6","authors":"Linda T. Darling","doi":"10.1017/S0026318400050653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"regarding race and ethnicity. According to the 1935 Resettlement Law, while those immigrants belonging to the \"Turkish race\" could settle wherever they wished, others could settle only in those areas which were approved by the authorities. In conclusion, Cagaptay suggests that High Kemalism approached the question of \"Who is a Turk\" by producing three concentric zones of Turkishness: \"an outer territorial one reserved for the non-Muslims (with the Jews closer to the center than the Christians); a middle religious one, reserved for the non-Turkish Muslims; an inner one, reserved for the Turks\" (p. 160). According to the author this conceptualization of ethnic boundaries and Turkishness continues to shape official policies today and that \"the further away (in the three concentric circles) a group is from the center, the more unaccommodating is the state toward it\" (p. 160). Islam, Secularism, and Modem Turkey: Who is a Turk? is a creative and a well-crafted work that should stimulate further research on a number of important issues which Cagaptay explores in his study. One can quibble about some of its shortcomings, most notably the absence of a discussion of the Alevis' role in forming Turkish national identity, but these should not detract from the overall scholarly quality of the book. Cagaptay's study deserves to be read by all those interested in learning more about one of the critical issues in modern Turkish history and politics. Sabri Sayari Sabanci University, Istanbul","PeriodicalId":88595,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Studies Association bulletin","volume":"41 1","pages":"188 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0026318400050653","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hülya Canbakal Society and Politics in an Ottoman Town: ‘Ayntab in the 17th Century. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2007. 213 pages, footnotes, tables, appendix, bibliography, index. Cloth US$120.00 ISBN 90-04-15456-6\",\"authors\":\"Linda T. Darling\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0026318400050653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"regarding race and ethnicity. According to the 1935 Resettlement Law, while those immigrants belonging to the \\\"Turkish race\\\" could settle wherever they wished, others could settle only in those areas which were approved by the authorities. In conclusion, Cagaptay suggests that High Kemalism approached the question of \\\"Who is a Turk\\\" by producing three concentric zones of Turkishness: \\\"an outer territorial one reserved for the non-Muslims (with the Jews closer to the center than the Christians); a middle religious one, reserved for the non-Turkish Muslims; an inner one, reserved for the Turks\\\" (p. 160). According to the author this conceptualization of ethnic boundaries and Turkishness continues to shape official policies today and that \\\"the further away (in the three concentric circles) a group is from the center, the more unaccommodating is the state toward it\\\" (p. 160). Islam, Secularism, and Modem Turkey: Who is a Turk? is a creative and a well-crafted work that should stimulate further research on a number of important issues which Cagaptay explores in his study. One can quibble about some of its shortcomings, most notably the absence of a discussion of the Alevis' role in forming Turkish national identity, but these should not detract from the overall scholarly quality of the book. Cagaptay's study deserves to be read by all those interested in learning more about one of the critical issues in modern Turkish history and politics. Sabri Sayari Sabanci University, Istanbul\",\"PeriodicalId\":88595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Studies Association bulletin\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"188 - 189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0026318400050653\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Studies Association bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400050653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Studies Association bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400050653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于种族和民族。根据1935年的《重新安置法》,虽然属于“土耳其种族”的移民可以在他们希望的任何地方定居,但其他人只能在当局批准的地区定居。总之,Cagaptay认为,高级凯末尔主义通过制造土耳其人的三个同心区来解决“谁是土耳其人”的问题:“一个为非穆斯林保留的外部领土(犹太人比基督徒更接近中心);一个中等宗教的,保留给非土耳其穆斯林;一个内部的,保留给土耳其人”(第160页)。根据作者的说法,这种种族边界和土耳其性的概念继续影响着今天的官方政策,并且“一个群体离中心越远(在三个同心圆中),国家对它就越不宽容”(第160页)。伊斯兰教、世俗主义与现代土耳其:谁是土耳其人?是一部富有创造性和精心设计的作品,应该会激发人们对恰格普塔伊在他的研究中所探索的一些重要问题的进一步研究。人们可以对它的一些缺点吹毛求疵,最明显的是没有讨论Alevis在形成土耳其民族认同中的作用,但这些都不应该减损这本书的整体学术质量。Cagaptay的研究值得所有有兴趣了解现代土耳其历史和政治中一个关键问题的人阅读。Sabri Sayari Sabanci大学,伊斯坦布尔
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hülya Canbakal Society and Politics in an Ottoman Town: ‘Ayntab in the 17th Century. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2007. 213 pages, footnotes, tables, appendix, bibliography, index. Cloth US$120.00 ISBN 90-04-15456-6
regarding race and ethnicity. According to the 1935 Resettlement Law, while those immigrants belonging to the "Turkish race" could settle wherever they wished, others could settle only in those areas which were approved by the authorities. In conclusion, Cagaptay suggests that High Kemalism approached the question of "Who is a Turk" by producing three concentric zones of Turkishness: "an outer territorial one reserved for the non-Muslims (with the Jews closer to the center than the Christians); a middle religious one, reserved for the non-Turkish Muslims; an inner one, reserved for the Turks" (p. 160). According to the author this conceptualization of ethnic boundaries and Turkishness continues to shape official policies today and that "the further away (in the three concentric circles) a group is from the center, the more unaccommodating is the state toward it" (p. 160). Islam, Secularism, and Modem Turkey: Who is a Turk? is a creative and a well-crafted work that should stimulate further research on a number of important issues which Cagaptay explores in his study. One can quibble about some of its shortcomings, most notably the absence of a discussion of the Alevis' role in forming Turkish national identity, but these should not detract from the overall scholarly quality of the book. Cagaptay's study deserves to be read by all those interested in learning more about one of the critical issues in modern Turkish history and politics. Sabri Sayari Sabanci University, Istanbul
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis Undergoing LeFort III Osteotomy With Distraction: A Case Series. Intramuscular fat formation in fetuses and the effect of increased protein intake during pregnancy in Hanwoo cattle. The role of dual antiplatelets in geographic atrophy secondary to non-neovascular aged-related macular degeneration. The Future of Conferences Circulating Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Predict Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Extent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1