基础科学研讨会III:骨科植入物评估的动物模型

Vijay K. Goel PhD (Basic Science Symposia Deputy Editor), Lisa Ferrara PhD (Animal Models Symposium Editor)
{"title":"基础科学研讨会III:骨科植入物评估的动物模型","authors":"Vijay K. Goel PhD (Basic Science Symposia Deputy Editor),&nbsp;Lisa Ferrara PhD (Animal Models Symposium Editor)","doi":"10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70039-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Preclinical research is the initial prerequisite to determining the efficacy of an implant for eventual translation into the clinical arena. Once a spinal implant has been validated through benchtop mechanical testing, analytical modeling, and in vitro evaluation, it is often useful to conduct an in vivo study using animal models to assess the interactions of the living tissue environment surrounding the spinal implant. Animal models are often implemented in the assessment of spinal implant behavior to identify potential problems with respect to tissue infiltration and adverse tissue and interface reactions. Biomechanical and biological investigations of the tissue and implant interface, as well as the surrounding supportive tissue structures, can provide early insight into the potential clinical performance once implanted into humans. However, the use of animals for implant evaluation remains controversial due to the varied anatomy, different healing rates, and complicated biomechanical environments. There are numerous challenges that exist with animal models such as determining (1) when an animal study is needed, (2) what the appropriate animal model is, (3) what the appropriate time points and outcome measures are, and (4) what the optimal sample size is. Another challenge for such studies is the need to downsize the spinal implants—a serious issue for some animal models.</p><p>A panel of eminent experts has been assembled for this symposium to address a number of these issues and challenges with the use of animal models for understanding implant and tissue interface behavior in a living environment. The experts are leaders in their field, and we are fortunate to have them provide insight into these challenges based on their varied experience in this area. We look forward to the readers’ participation and feedback to this symposium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70039-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basic Science Symposium III: Animal Models for Orthopaedic Implant Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Vijay K. Goel PhD (Basic Science Symposia Deputy Editor),&nbsp;Lisa Ferrara PhD (Animal Models Symposium Editor)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70039-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Preclinical research is the initial prerequisite to determining the efficacy of an implant for eventual translation into the clinical arena. Once a spinal implant has been validated through benchtop mechanical testing, analytical modeling, and in vitro evaluation, it is often useful to conduct an in vivo study using animal models to assess the interactions of the living tissue environment surrounding the spinal implant. Animal models are often implemented in the assessment of spinal implant behavior to identify potential problems with respect to tissue infiltration and adverse tissue and interface reactions. Biomechanical and biological investigations of the tissue and implant interface, as well as the surrounding supportive tissue structures, can provide early insight into the potential clinical performance once implanted into humans. However, the use of animals for implant evaluation remains controversial due to the varied anatomy, different healing rates, and complicated biomechanical environments. There are numerous challenges that exist with animal models such as determining (1) when an animal study is needed, (2) what the appropriate animal model is, (3) what the appropriate time points and outcome measures are, and (4) what the optimal sample size is. Another challenge for such studies is the need to downsize the spinal implants—a serious issue for some animal models.</p><p>A panel of eminent experts has been assembled for this symposium to address a number of these issues and challenges with the use of animal models for understanding implant and tissue interface behavior in a living environment. The experts are leaders in their field, and we are fortunate to have them provide insight into these challenges based on their varied experience in this area. We look forward to the readers’ participation and feedback to this symposium.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70039-2\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981008700392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981008700392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

临床前研究是确定植入物最终转化为临床领域的有效性的先决条件。一旦脊柱植入物通过台式力学测试、分析建模和体外评估得到验证,通常可以使用动物模型进行体内研究,以评估脊柱植入物周围活组织环境的相互作用。动物模型通常用于评估脊柱植入物的行为,以识别组织浸润和不良组织和界面反应方面的潜在问题。对组织和植入物界面以及周围支持组织结构进行生物力学和生物学研究,可以为植入人体后的潜在临床性能提供早期见解。然而,由于不同的解剖结构、不同的愈合速度和复杂的生物力学环境,使用动物进行植入物评估仍然存在争议。动物模型存在许多挑战,例如确定(1)何时需要进行动物研究,(2)合适的动物模型是什么,(3)合适的时间点和结果测量是什么,以及(4)最佳样本量是什么。这类研究的另一个挑战是需要缩小脊椎植入物的尺寸——这对一些动物模型来说是一个严重的问题。本次研讨会召集了一组知名专家,讨论使用动物模型来理解生活环境中植入物和组织界面行为的一些问题和挑战。这些专家都是各自领域的领导者,我们很幸运能请到他们根据他们在这一领域的丰富经验,对这些挑战提供见解。我们期待读者对本次研讨会的参与和反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Basic Science Symposium III: Animal Models for Orthopaedic Implant Evaluation

Introduction

Preclinical research is the initial prerequisite to determining the efficacy of an implant for eventual translation into the clinical arena. Once a spinal implant has been validated through benchtop mechanical testing, analytical modeling, and in vitro evaluation, it is often useful to conduct an in vivo study using animal models to assess the interactions of the living tissue environment surrounding the spinal implant. Animal models are often implemented in the assessment of spinal implant behavior to identify potential problems with respect to tissue infiltration and adverse tissue and interface reactions. Biomechanical and biological investigations of the tissue and implant interface, as well as the surrounding supportive tissue structures, can provide early insight into the potential clinical performance once implanted into humans. However, the use of animals for implant evaluation remains controversial due to the varied anatomy, different healing rates, and complicated biomechanical environments. There are numerous challenges that exist with animal models such as determining (1) when an animal study is needed, (2) what the appropriate animal model is, (3) what the appropriate time points and outcome measures are, and (4) what the optimal sample size is. Another challenge for such studies is the need to downsize the spinal implants—a serious issue for some animal models.

A panel of eminent experts has been assembled for this symposium to address a number of these issues and challenges with the use of animal models for understanding implant and tissue interface behavior in a living environment. The experts are leaders in their field, and we are fortunate to have them provide insight into these challenges based on their varied experience in this area. We look forward to the readers’ participation and feedback to this symposium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1