确定未经审判被拘留者地位和权利的司法权

Q1 Social Sciences Harvard International Law Journal Pub Date : 2009-10-12 DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005
J. Paust
{"title":"确定未经审判被拘留者地位和权利的司法权","authors":"J. Paust","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, cited later by the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, addresses the propriety of detention without trial under human rights law and the laws of war as well as judicial power and responsibility to review the propriety of detention. Significant trends in judicial decision concerning judicial power to second-guess the commander in chief during war with respect to the status, rights and detention of persons and the seizure of property are documented. Contrary to claims of the Bush Administration, the President does not have unreviewable power to classify persons as enemy or unlawful combatants and to detain such persons without trial. International law allows detention without trial in certain circumstances, but also requires access to courts of law and the right to challenge the propriety of detention.","PeriodicalId":35765,"journal":{"name":"Harvard International Law Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"503-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Power to Determine the Status and Rights of Persons Detained Without Trial\",\"authors\":\"J. Paust\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article, cited later by the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, addresses the propriety of detention without trial under human rights law and the laws of war as well as judicial power and responsibility to review the propriety of detention. Significant trends in judicial decision concerning judicial power to second-guess the commander in chief during war with respect to the status, rights and detention of persons and the seizure of property are documented. Contrary to claims of the Bush Administration, the President does not have unreviewable power to classify persons as enemy or unlawful combatants and to detain such persons without trial. International law allows detention without trial in certain circumstances, but also requires access to courts of law and the right to challenge the propriety of detention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard International Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"503-532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard International Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard International Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511611322.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇文章后来被最高法院在哈姆迪诉拉姆斯菲尔德案中引用,论述了在人权法和战争法下未经审判的拘留的适当性,以及审查拘留的适当性的司法权力和责任。关于在战争期间对人的地位、权利和拘留以及没收财产进行事后猜测的司法权的司法决定的重要趋势有记录。与布什政府的说法相反,总统并没有不可审查的权力,可以将人归类为敌人或非法战斗人员,并可以不经审判就拘留这些人。国际法允许在某些情况下未经审判的拘留,但也要求有诉诸法院的机会和对拘留的适当性提出质疑的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Power to Determine the Status and Rights of Persons Detained Without Trial
This article, cited later by the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, addresses the propriety of detention without trial under human rights law and the laws of war as well as judicial power and responsibility to review the propriety of detention. Significant trends in judicial decision concerning judicial power to second-guess the commander in chief during war with respect to the status, rights and detention of persons and the seizure of property are documented. Contrary to claims of the Bush Administration, the President does not have unreviewable power to classify persons as enemy or unlawful combatants and to detain such persons without trial. International law allows detention without trial in certain circumstances, but also requires access to courts of law and the right to challenge the propriety of detention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harvard International Law Journal
Harvard International Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: In an opinion survey published in The International Lawyer, senior scholars in the international and comparative law fields ranked the Harvard International Law Journal as having the “strongest academic reputation” of all student-edited international and comparative law specialty journals published in the United States. The ILJ publishes articles on international, comparative, and foreign law, the role of international law in U.S. courts, and the international ramifications of U.S. domestic law. These articles are written by the most prominent scholars and practitioners in the field and have been recognized as important contributions to the development of international law.
期刊最新文献
The Human Right to peace What is an International Crime? (A Revisionist History) Power Shifts in International Law: Structural Realignment and Substantive Pluralism Behavioral International Law and Economics Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1