哈布斯堡帝国背景下的马德里医院和福利

Teresa Huguet-Termes
{"title":"哈布斯堡帝国背景下的马德里医院和福利","authors":"Teresa Huguet-Termes","doi":"10.1017/S0025727300072409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last twenty-five years, the tendency of historians to see extreme distinctions between Catholic and Protestant health care provision has faded away, mainly thanks to the works of Brian Pullan on Venice and Jean-Pierre Gutton on Lyons. It has become generally accepted that Catholic areas pursued efficient and highly selective welfare policies, especially as regards the control of public begging, in order to achieve long-term social improvement by giving the poor both an education and opportunities to work.1 In order to centralize and co-ordinate the resources available, welfare services were improved by the creation of institutions under the auspices of the Church and lay authorities.2 Public begging was prohibited, and relief was limited to deserving local inhabitants and restricted to the period before they could be set to work, while the itinerant poor were given only the temporary assistance they required. It has also been generally assumed that Madrid was included among the towns where a programme of reform led by lay elites following the guidelines of the poor law tract De subventione pauperum (On Assistance to the Poor) by Juan Luis Vives (1526) prevailed from the second to the fourth decades of the sixteenth century. In accordance with this programme, hospitals for beggars and other “undeserving” poor were founded, supposedly reaching a peak in the seventeenth century. In the confines of such institutions, unworthy individuals could be punished if they resisted the obligation to work.3 However, measures for poor relief have primarily been studied in cities with a strong communal tradition and a sophisticated system of urban government. It is these studies, simplistically extrapolated to less well-researched cities like Madrid, that have provided the basis for the picture of the principal characteristics of the Catholic system of welfare.4 But what was the true situation in a villa—Madrid—which was essentially a creation of the early modern period, and which was designed by the Hapsburg dynasty to be the centre of government of the largest Catholic empire history has ever known? It is clear that both the history and character of Madrid (a small town that had become the capital and the home of the royal court in 1561) are very different from those of the republics, principalities and cities of Spain, Italy and France. The latter were endowed with municipal dynamism, strong manufacturing, trade and guild traditions, and possessed systems of relief that have attracted the attention of historians and have generally been regarded as pioneering. The aim of this paper is to summarize current research on poor relief in Madrid, including the policy towards the sick, between 1561 and 1700. After briefly reviewing the current state of research, two particular features will be focused on, the assistance given to the sick poor, and that which all other categories of poor people received. It will be argued that, in contrast with other Catholic areas, improvements in health care rather than the redemption and rehabilitation of beggars and vagrants were seen as a useful ideological and political resource for the dynasty up to 1700. In order to illustrate these two topics, three episodes will be examined. First is the plan for poor relief exemplified by the ordinances of the General Hospital of Madrid (1589). In theory, the hospital was the result of the unification of various existing institutions, a move undertaken only five years after Madrid had been declared the capital. Second, through sources such as visitation and account books, the history of this institution will then be traced from 1613 to 1677, reflecting how policies were carried out in practice. Finally, brief reference will also be made to the new project in 1673 for a shelter for beggars and the reasons for its “renewed” failure.","PeriodicalId":74144,"journal":{"name":"Medical history. Supplement","volume":"1 1","pages":"64 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0025727300072409","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Madrid Hospitals and Welfare in the Context of the Hapsburg Empire\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Huguet-Termes\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0025727300072409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last twenty-five years, the tendency of historians to see extreme distinctions between Catholic and Protestant health care provision has faded away, mainly thanks to the works of Brian Pullan on Venice and Jean-Pierre Gutton on Lyons. It has become generally accepted that Catholic areas pursued efficient and highly selective welfare policies, especially as regards the control of public begging, in order to achieve long-term social improvement by giving the poor both an education and opportunities to work.1 In order to centralize and co-ordinate the resources available, welfare services were improved by the creation of institutions under the auspices of the Church and lay authorities.2 Public begging was prohibited, and relief was limited to deserving local inhabitants and restricted to the period before they could be set to work, while the itinerant poor were given only the temporary assistance they required. It has also been generally assumed that Madrid was included among the towns where a programme of reform led by lay elites following the guidelines of the poor law tract De subventione pauperum (On Assistance to the Poor) by Juan Luis Vives (1526) prevailed from the second to the fourth decades of the sixteenth century. In accordance with this programme, hospitals for beggars and other “undeserving” poor were founded, supposedly reaching a peak in the seventeenth century. In the confines of such institutions, unworthy individuals could be punished if they resisted the obligation to work.3 However, measures for poor relief have primarily been studied in cities with a strong communal tradition and a sophisticated system of urban government. It is these studies, simplistically extrapolated to less well-researched cities like Madrid, that have provided the basis for the picture of the principal characteristics of the Catholic system of welfare.4 But what was the true situation in a villa—Madrid—which was essentially a creation of the early modern period, and which was designed by the Hapsburg dynasty to be the centre of government of the largest Catholic empire history has ever known? It is clear that both the history and character of Madrid (a small town that had become the capital and the home of the royal court in 1561) are very different from those of the republics, principalities and cities of Spain, Italy and France. The latter were endowed with municipal dynamism, strong manufacturing, trade and guild traditions, and possessed systems of relief that have attracted the attention of historians and have generally been regarded as pioneering. The aim of this paper is to summarize current research on poor relief in Madrid, including the policy towards the sick, between 1561 and 1700. After briefly reviewing the current state of research, two particular features will be focused on, the assistance given to the sick poor, and that which all other categories of poor people received. It will be argued that, in contrast with other Catholic areas, improvements in health care rather than the redemption and rehabilitation of beggars and vagrants were seen as a useful ideological and political resource for the dynasty up to 1700. In order to illustrate these two topics, three episodes will be examined. First is the plan for poor relief exemplified by the ordinances of the General Hospital of Madrid (1589). In theory, the hospital was the result of the unification of various existing institutions, a move undertaken only five years after Madrid had been declared the capital. Second, through sources such as visitation and account books, the history of this institution will then be traced from 1613 to 1677, reflecting how policies were carried out in practice. Finally, brief reference will also be made to the new project in 1673 for a shelter for beggars and the reasons for its “renewed” failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical history. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"64 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0025727300072409\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical history. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300072409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical history. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300072409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在过去的25年里,历史学家认为天主教和新教在医疗保健方面存在极端差异的倾向已经消失,这主要归功于布莱恩·普兰(Brian Pullan)关于威尼斯和让-皮埃尔·古顿(Jean-Pierre Gutton)关于里昂的著作。人们普遍认为,天主教地区实行有效和高度选择性的福利政策,特别是在控制公共乞讨方面,以便通过给予穷人教育和工作机会来实现长期的社会改善为了集中和协调现有的资源,在教会和世俗当局的主持下设立了各种机构,从而改善了福利服务公开乞讨是被禁止的,救济仅限于有资格的当地居民,并且仅限于他们能够开始工作之前的一段时间,而流动的穷人只得到他们需要的临时援助。人们还普遍认为,马德里是由非专业精英领导的改革计划的城镇之一,这些改革计划遵循胡安·路易斯·维维斯(1526年)的《穷人援助法》(De subventione pauperum)的指导方针,从16世纪第二到第四十年盛行。根据这一方案,为乞丐和其他"不应得的"穷人建立了医院,据说在17世纪达到了顶峰。在这些机构的范围内,不值得的人如果拒绝工作的义务就会受到惩罚然而,救济穷人的措施主要是在具有强大的社区传统和复杂的城市政府制度的城市进行研究的。正是这些研究,简单地外推到像马德里这样研究较少的城市,为描绘天主教福利制度的主要特征提供了基础但是,这座马德里别墅的真实情况是什么呢?这座别墅本质上是近代早期的产物,由哈布斯堡王朝设计,作为历史上最大的天主教帝国的政府中心。很明显,马德里(一个在1561年成为首都和王室所在地的小镇)的历史和特点与西班牙、意大利和法国的共和国、公国和城市有很大的不同。后者被赋予了城市活力、强大的制造业、贸易和行会传统,并拥有吸引历史学家注意的救济制度,通常被认为是先驱。本文的目的是总结目前研究的贫困救济在马德里,包括对病人的政策,在1561年和1700年之间。在简要审查了目前的研究状况之后,将着重讨论两个特别的特点,即对患病穷人的援助和所有其他类别的穷人所得到的援助。与其他天主教地区不同的是,直到1700年,改善医疗保健而不是对乞丐和流浪者的救赎和改造被视为王朝有用的意识形态和政治资源。为了说明这两个主题,将研究三集。首先是以马德里总医院法令(1589年)为例的穷人救济计划。从理论上讲,该医院是各种现有机构统一的结果,这一举措是在马德里被宣布为首都仅五年后进行的。其次,通过访问和账簿等资料,该机构的历史将从1613年追溯到1677年,反映政策在实践中是如何执行的。最后,还将简要介绍1673年为乞丐提供庇护所的新项目及其“再次”失败的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Madrid Hospitals and Welfare in the Context of the Hapsburg Empire
Over the last twenty-five years, the tendency of historians to see extreme distinctions between Catholic and Protestant health care provision has faded away, mainly thanks to the works of Brian Pullan on Venice and Jean-Pierre Gutton on Lyons. It has become generally accepted that Catholic areas pursued efficient and highly selective welfare policies, especially as regards the control of public begging, in order to achieve long-term social improvement by giving the poor both an education and opportunities to work.1 In order to centralize and co-ordinate the resources available, welfare services were improved by the creation of institutions under the auspices of the Church and lay authorities.2 Public begging was prohibited, and relief was limited to deserving local inhabitants and restricted to the period before they could be set to work, while the itinerant poor were given only the temporary assistance they required. It has also been generally assumed that Madrid was included among the towns where a programme of reform led by lay elites following the guidelines of the poor law tract De subventione pauperum (On Assistance to the Poor) by Juan Luis Vives (1526) prevailed from the second to the fourth decades of the sixteenth century. In accordance with this programme, hospitals for beggars and other “undeserving” poor were founded, supposedly reaching a peak in the seventeenth century. In the confines of such institutions, unworthy individuals could be punished if they resisted the obligation to work.3 However, measures for poor relief have primarily been studied in cities with a strong communal tradition and a sophisticated system of urban government. It is these studies, simplistically extrapolated to less well-researched cities like Madrid, that have provided the basis for the picture of the principal characteristics of the Catholic system of welfare.4 But what was the true situation in a villa—Madrid—which was essentially a creation of the early modern period, and which was designed by the Hapsburg dynasty to be the centre of government of the largest Catholic empire history has ever known? It is clear that both the history and character of Madrid (a small town that had become the capital and the home of the royal court in 1561) are very different from those of the republics, principalities and cities of Spain, Italy and France. The latter were endowed with municipal dynamism, strong manufacturing, trade and guild traditions, and possessed systems of relief that have attracted the attention of historians and have generally been regarded as pioneering. The aim of this paper is to summarize current research on poor relief in Madrid, including the policy towards the sick, between 1561 and 1700. After briefly reviewing the current state of research, two particular features will be focused on, the assistance given to the sick poor, and that which all other categories of poor people received. It will be argued that, in contrast with other Catholic areas, improvements in health care rather than the redemption and rehabilitation of beggars and vagrants were seen as a useful ideological and political resource for the dynasty up to 1700. In order to illustrate these two topics, three episodes will be examined. First is the plan for poor relief exemplified by the ordinances of the General Hospital of Madrid (1589). In theory, the hospital was the result of the unification of various existing institutions, a move undertaken only five years after Madrid had been declared the capital. Second, through sources such as visitation and account books, the history of this institution will then be traced from 1613 to 1677, reflecting how policies were carried out in practice. Finally, brief reference will also be made to the new project in 1673 for a shelter for beggars and the reasons for its “renewed” failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Appendix II 3. Bibliography Appendix B Appendix V
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1