资优转介者一般能力指数(GAI)与全面智商的预测能力比较。

E. Rowe, Jessica M. Kingsley, Dawna F Thompson
{"title":"资优转介者一般能力指数(GAI)与全面智商的预测能力比较。","authors":"E. Rowe, Jessica M. Kingsley, Dawna F Thompson","doi":"10.1037/A0020148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Ability Index (GAI) is a composite ability score for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition (WISC–IV) that minimizes the impact of tasks involving working memory and processing speed. The goal of the current study was to compare the degree to which the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) and the GAI predict academic achievement in math and reading among a group of 88 children tested for gifted programming. All students had significant variability among their index scores on the WISC–IV. Whereas both the FSIQ and GAI significantly predicted standardized achievement test scores in reading and math, the FSIQ explained more of the variance. In sequential regression analyses, both working memory and verbal comprehension scores explained significant, unique variance in reading and math scores. However, measures of processing speed and perceptual reasoning did not account for significant amounts of variance in achievement scores over and above measures of working memory and verbal comprehension. The inclusion of working memory scores in calculation of the FSIQ appears to account for the difference in prediction between the FSIQ and the GAI.","PeriodicalId":48005,"journal":{"name":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","volume":"25 1","pages":"119-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0020148","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Ability of the General Ability Index (GAI) versus the Full Scale IQ among Gifted Referrals.\",\"authors\":\"E. Rowe, Jessica M. Kingsley, Dawna F Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/A0020148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The General Ability Index (GAI) is a composite ability score for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition (WISC–IV) that minimizes the impact of tasks involving working memory and processing speed. The goal of the current study was to compare the degree to which the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) and the GAI predict academic achievement in math and reading among a group of 88 children tested for gifted programming. All students had significant variability among their index scores on the WISC–IV. Whereas both the FSIQ and GAI significantly predicted standardized achievement test scores in reading and math, the FSIQ explained more of the variance. In sequential regression analyses, both working memory and verbal comprehension scores explained significant, unique variance in reading and math scores. However, measures of processing speed and perceptual reasoning did not account for significant amounts of variance in achievement scores over and above measures of working memory and verbal comprehension. The inclusion of working memory scores in calculation of the FSIQ appears to account for the difference in prediction between the FSIQ and the GAI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"119-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0020148\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

一般能力指数(GAI)是韦氏儿童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)的综合能力分数,它最大限度地减少了涉及工作记忆和处理速度的任务的影响。目前这项研究的目的是比较全面智商(FSIQ)和GAI对88名儿童在数学和阅读方面的学术成就的预测程度。所有学生在WISC-IV上的指标得分都有显著的差异。虽然FSIQ和GAI都能显著预测阅读和数学的标准化成就测试成绩,但FSIQ解释了更多的差异。在序列回归分析中,工作记忆和语言理解分数解释了阅读和数学分数显著的、独特的差异。然而,处理速度和知觉推理的测量并不能解释成就分数在工作记忆和语言理解测量上的显著差异。在FSIQ的计算中包含工作记忆分数似乎解释了FSIQ和GAI之间预测的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Ability of the General Ability Index (GAI) versus the Full Scale IQ among Gifted Referrals.
The General Ability Index (GAI) is a composite ability score for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition (WISC–IV) that minimizes the impact of tasks involving working memory and processing speed. The goal of the current study was to compare the degree to which the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) and the GAI predict academic achievement in math and reading among a group of 88 children tested for gifted programming. All students had significant variability among their index scores on the WISC–IV. Whereas both the FSIQ and GAI significantly predicted standardized achievement test scores in reading and math, the FSIQ explained more of the variance. In sequential regression analyses, both working memory and verbal comprehension scores explained significant, unique variance in reading and math scores. However, measures of processing speed and perceptual reasoning did not account for significant amounts of variance in achievement scores over and above measures of working memory and verbal comprehension. The inclusion of working memory scores in calculation of the FSIQ appears to account for the difference in prediction between the FSIQ and the GAI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The flagship scholarly journal in the field of school psychology, the journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical analyses, and literature reviews encompassing a full range of methodologies and orientations, including educational, cognitive, social, cognitive behavioral, preventive, dynamic, multicultural, and organizational psychology. Focusing primarily on children, youth, and the adults who serve them, School Psychology Quarterly publishes information pertaining to populations across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Cognitive Ability and Math Computation Developmental Relations With Math Problem Solving: An Integrated, Multigroup Approach Supplemental Material for Measuring Teacher Practices and Student Academic Engagement: A Convergent Validity Study Supplemental Material for Influence of Homogeneity of Student Characteristics in a Group-Based Social Competence Intervention Observer and Student Ratings of the Class Environment: A Preliminary Investigation of Convergence Protective Factor Screening for Prevention Practice: Sensitivity and Specificity of the DESSA-Mini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1