Devereux幼儿评估保护因子量表的因子结构及性别不变性。

Julia A. Ogg, T. Brinkman, R. Dedrick, J. Carlson
{"title":"Devereux幼儿评估保护因子量表的因子结构及性别不变性。","authors":"Julia A. Ogg, T. Brinkman, R. Dedrick, J. Carlson","doi":"10.1037/A0020251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michigan State UniversityEarly childhood social–emotional assessment has traditionally focused on risk factorsor psychopathology, and has less frequently examined protective factors that may serveto promote positive developmental outcomes for children. To advance conceptualmodels that include protective factors as key explanatory constructs, there is a need forquantitative measures of protective factors that are psychometrically sound and func-tion similarly across different subgroups, including gender. This study examined thefactor structure and factorial invariance across gender of the Devereux Early ChildhoodAssessment (DECA), one of the few measures to focus on protective behaviors. A totalof 1,344 parents completed the DECA for a group of developmentally and economi-cally at-risk children ages 2 to 5 years. Results of the con\u001ermatory factor analysis, the\u001erst to be conducted on the DECA, revealed that the factor structure proposed by theauthors of the DECA was adequate with some modi\u001ecations. Multigroup comparisonsby gender supported the invariance of the factor pattern coef\u001ecients and 26 of the 27item intercepts, indicating that the items were functioning similarly across boys andgirls. Suggestions for improving problematic item pairs and content are provided. Thisstudy can be viewed as part of the ongoing validation of the DECA and an importantcontribution to the strength-based assessment literature.Keywords:","PeriodicalId":48005,"journal":{"name":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","volume":"25 1","pages":"107-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0020251","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor Structure and Invariance across Gender of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Protective Factor Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Julia A. Ogg, T. Brinkman, R. Dedrick, J. Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/A0020251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michigan State UniversityEarly childhood social–emotional assessment has traditionally focused on risk factorsor psychopathology, and has less frequently examined protective factors that may serveto promote positive developmental outcomes for children. To advance conceptualmodels that include protective factors as key explanatory constructs, there is a need forquantitative measures of protective factors that are psychometrically sound and func-tion similarly across different subgroups, including gender. This study examined thefactor structure and factorial invariance across gender of the Devereux Early ChildhoodAssessment (DECA), one of the few measures to focus on protective behaviors. A totalof 1,344 parents completed the DECA for a group of developmentally and economi-cally at-risk children ages 2 to 5 years. Results of the con\\u001ermatory factor analysis, the\\u001erst to be conducted on the DECA, revealed that the factor structure proposed by theauthors of the DECA was adequate with some modi\\u001ecations. Multigroup comparisonsby gender supported the invariance of the factor pattern coef\\u001ecients and 26 of the 27item intercepts, indicating that the items were functioning similarly across boys andgirls. Suggestions for improving problematic item pairs and content are provided. Thisstudy can be viewed as part of the ongoing validation of the DECA and an importantcontribution to the strength-based assessment literature.Keywords:\",\"PeriodicalId\":48005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"107-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0020251\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0020251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

每年的儿童社会情绪评估传统上集中在风险因素和精神病理学上,很少检查可能促进儿童积极发展结果的保护因素。为了推进包括保护因素作为关键解释结构的概念模型,需要对保护因素进行定量测量,这些因素在心理测量学上是合理的,并且在不同的亚群体(包括性别)中功能相似。本研究考察了Devereux早期儿童评估(DECA)的因素结构和跨性别的因素不变性,DECA是少数关注保护行为的措施之一。共有1,344名家长为一组2至5岁的发展和经济上有风险的儿童完成了DECA。验证性因子分析(第一次对DECA进行分析)的结果显示,DECA作者提出的因子结构是适当的,有一些修正的阳离子。按性别进行的多组比较支持客户和27个项目拦截中的26个因素模式系数的不变性,表明这些项目在男孩和女孩之间的功能相似。对存在问题的项目对和内容提出了改进建议。本研究可被视为正在进行的DECA验证的一部分,并对基于强度的评估文献做出了重要贡献。关键词:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factor Structure and Invariance across Gender of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Protective Factor Scale.
Michigan State UniversityEarly childhood social–emotional assessment has traditionally focused on risk factorsor psychopathology, and has less frequently examined protective factors that may serveto promote positive developmental outcomes for children. To advance conceptualmodels that include protective factors as key explanatory constructs, there is a need forquantitative measures of protective factors that are psychometrically sound and func-tion similarly across different subgroups, including gender. This study examined thefactor structure and factorial invariance across gender of the Devereux Early ChildhoodAssessment (DECA), one of the few measures to focus on protective behaviors. A totalof 1,344 parents completed the DECA for a group of developmentally and economi-cally at-risk children ages 2 to 5 years. Results of the conrmatory factor analysis, therst to be conducted on the DECA, revealed that the factor structure proposed by theauthors of the DECA was adequate with some modications. Multigroup comparisonsby gender supported the invariance of the factor pattern coefcients and 26 of the 27item intercepts, indicating that the items were functioning similarly across boys andgirls. Suggestions for improving problematic item pairs and content are provided. Thisstudy can be viewed as part of the ongoing validation of the DECA and an importantcontribution to the strength-based assessment literature.Keywords:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The flagship scholarly journal in the field of school psychology, the journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical analyses, and literature reviews encompassing a full range of methodologies and orientations, including educational, cognitive, social, cognitive behavioral, preventive, dynamic, multicultural, and organizational psychology. Focusing primarily on children, youth, and the adults who serve them, School Psychology Quarterly publishes information pertaining to populations across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Cognitive Ability and Math Computation Developmental Relations With Math Problem Solving: An Integrated, Multigroup Approach Supplemental Material for Measuring Teacher Practices and Student Academic Engagement: A Convergent Validity Study Supplemental Material for Influence of Homogeneity of Student Characteristics in a Group-Based Social Competence Intervention Observer and Student Ratings of the Class Environment: A Preliminary Investigation of Convergence Protective Factor Screening for Prevention Practice: Sensitivity and Specificity of the DESSA-Mini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1