精神病患者照护者的封闭需求

J. Onwumere, E. Kuipers, P. Bebbington, G. Dunn, D. Freeman, D. Fowler, P. Garety
{"title":"精神病患者照护者的封闭需求","authors":"J. Onwumere, E. Kuipers, P. Bebbington, G. Dunn, D. Freeman, D. Fowler, P. Garety","doi":"10.1017/S1121189X00000865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Aim – The aim of the study was to determine how carer need for closure relates to expressed emotion. It also examined the links between carer need for closure and patient functioning including patient need for closure. Methods – In a cross-sectional study, 70 caregivers of patients with psychosis completed the Need for Closure Scale (NFCS), the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI) and measures of distress, burden, coping and social network. The NFCS was assessed in terms of its two primary dimensions: a need for simple structure (NFSS) and Decisiveness. Patients also completed measures of psychotic symptoms and affect, and in 50 matched caregiver patient dyads, direct comparisons were undertaken between caregiver and patient NFCS scores. Results – No links were found between caregiver NFC and EE in this predominately low EE sample. More decisive carers had higher levels of self esteem, were less distressed, and resorted less to avoidant coping. The need for simple structure was greater in carers who lacked a confidante. As predicted, patients reported significantly higher NFSS and lower Decisiveness scores than carers, but no relationship was observed between caregiver NFC and patient symptoms of psychosis. Conclusions – Carers reporting confident decision making were also more likely to report adaptive functioning in terms of having lower levels of avoidant coping and distress, and higher levels of self esteem. The results suggest that this style of thinking might be a helpful way of coping with some of the difficulties involved in caring for someone with psychosis.","PeriodicalId":72946,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","volume":"19 1","pages":"159 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1121189X00000865","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The need for closure in caregivers of people with psychosis\",\"authors\":\"J. Onwumere, E. Kuipers, P. Bebbington, G. Dunn, D. Freeman, D. Fowler, P. Garety\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1121189X00000865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Aim – The aim of the study was to determine how carer need for closure relates to expressed emotion. It also examined the links between carer need for closure and patient functioning including patient need for closure. Methods – In a cross-sectional study, 70 caregivers of patients with psychosis completed the Need for Closure Scale (NFCS), the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI) and measures of distress, burden, coping and social network. The NFCS was assessed in terms of its two primary dimensions: a need for simple structure (NFSS) and Decisiveness. Patients also completed measures of psychotic symptoms and affect, and in 50 matched caregiver patient dyads, direct comparisons were undertaken between caregiver and patient NFCS scores. Results – No links were found between caregiver NFC and EE in this predominately low EE sample. More decisive carers had higher levels of self esteem, were less distressed, and resorted less to avoidant coping. The need for simple structure was greater in carers who lacked a confidante. As predicted, patients reported significantly higher NFSS and lower Decisiveness scores than carers, but no relationship was observed between caregiver NFC and patient symptoms of psychosis. Conclusions – Carers reporting confident decision making were also more likely to report adaptive functioning in terms of having lower levels of avoidant coping and distress, and higher levels of self esteem. The results suggest that this style of thinking might be a helpful way of coping with some of the difficulties involved in caring for someone with psychosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1121189X00000865\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00000865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的总结:本研究的目的是确定照顾者对封闭的需求与表达的情绪之间的关系。它还检查了护理人员对关闭的需求与患者功能之间的联系,包括患者对关闭的需求。方法:在一项横断面研究中,70名精神病患者的护理人员完成了关闭需求量表(NFCS), Camberwell家庭访谈(CFI)和痛苦,负担,应对和社会网络的测量。NFCS主要从两个方面进行评估:简单结构需求(NFSS)和决断性。患者还完成了精神病症状和影响的测量,在50对匹配的护理者和患者中,对护理者和患者的NFCS评分进行了直接比较。结果-在这个主要是低情感表达的样本中,没有发现护理人员NFC和情感表达之间的联系。更果断的照顾者有更高的自尊水平,更少痛苦,更少采取逃避应对。缺少知己的看护人对简单结构的需求更大。正如预测的那样,患者报告的NFSS明显高于护理人员,果断得分明显低于护理人员,但没有观察到护理人员NFC与患者精神病症状之间的关系。结论——报告自信决策的护理人员也更有可能报告适应功能,即回避性应对和痛苦水平较低,自尊水平较高。研究结果表明,这种思维方式可能是应对照顾精神病患者所涉及的一些困难的一种有益的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The need for closure in caregivers of people with psychosis
Summary Aim – The aim of the study was to determine how carer need for closure relates to expressed emotion. It also examined the links between carer need for closure and patient functioning including patient need for closure. Methods – In a cross-sectional study, 70 caregivers of patients with psychosis completed the Need for Closure Scale (NFCS), the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI) and measures of distress, burden, coping and social network. The NFCS was assessed in terms of its two primary dimensions: a need for simple structure (NFSS) and Decisiveness. Patients also completed measures of psychotic symptoms and affect, and in 50 matched caregiver patient dyads, direct comparisons were undertaken between caregiver and patient NFCS scores. Results – No links were found between caregiver NFC and EE in this predominately low EE sample. More decisive carers had higher levels of self esteem, were less distressed, and resorted less to avoidant coping. The need for simple structure was greater in carers who lacked a confidante. As predicted, patients reported significantly higher NFSS and lower Decisiveness scores than carers, but no relationship was observed between caregiver NFC and patient symptoms of psychosis. Conclusions – Carers reporting confident decision making were also more likely to report adaptive functioning in terms of having lower levels of avoidant coping and distress, and higher levels of self esteem. The results suggest that this style of thinking might be a helpful way of coping with some of the difficulties involved in caring for someone with psychosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduzione Arsenic accumulation in edible vegetables and health risk reduction by groundwater treatment using an adsorption process. Single-cell imaging of normal and malignant cell engraftment into optically clear prkdc-null SCID zebrafish. Acute in-patient care in modern, community-based mental health services. Where and how? Is locating acute wards in the general hospital an essential element in psychiatric reform? The U.K. experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1